روش نقدی ویتگنشتاین متأخر

ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ. (1385). کتاب آبی. مالک حسینی. تهران: هرمس.

ویتگنشتاین، لودویگ. (1389). پژوهشهای فلسفی. فریدون فاطمی. تهران: نشر مرکز.

Cavell, Stanley. (1979). The Claim of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cavell, Stanley. (1988). «Declining decline: Wittgenstein as a philosopher of culture». Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 31(3), pp. 253-264.

Cavell, Stanley. (2005). Philosophy the Day After Tomorrow. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Conant, James Ferguson. (2001). A Prolegomenon to the Reading of Later Wittgenstein. In: L. Nagl & C. Mouffe, eds. The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism or Deconstruction. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 93- 130.

Conant, James Ferguson. (2005). «Stanley Cavell's Wittgenstein». The Harvard Review Of Philosophy, 13(1), pp. 51-65.

Conant, James Ferguson. (2011). Wittgenstein's Methods. In: O. Kuusela & M. McGinn, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 620-645.

Crary, Alice. (2000). Wittgenstein’s Philosophy in relation to political thought. In: A. crary & R. Read, eds. The new Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, pp. 118-145.

Diamond, Cora. (1988). «Losing Your Concepts». Ethics, 98(2), pp. 255-277.

Diamond, Cora. (1989). Rules: Looking in the Right Place. In: D. Z. Phillips & P. Winch, eds. Wittgenstein: attention to particulars: essays in honour of Rush Rhees. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 12-34.

Diamond, Cora. (1995). The Realistic Spirit : Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Diamond, Cora. (2005). «Logical Syntax in Wittgestein's Tractatus». The Philosophical Quarterly, 55(218), pp. 78-89.

Dilman, İlham ., 2002.Wittgenstein's Copernican revolution: the question of linguistic idealism. New York: Palgrave.

Finkelstein, David H. (2000). Wittgenstein on rules and platonism. In: A. Crary & R. Read, eds. The new Wittgenstein. London: Routledge, pp. 53-73.

Gustafsson, Martin. (2000). Entangled Sense: an inquiry into the philosophical significance of meaning and rules. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

Hacker, Peter. M. S. (1986). Insight and illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Iczkovits, Yaniv. (2012). Wittgenstein’s Ethical Thought. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kuusela, Oskari. (2008). The Struggle Against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Lagerspetz, Olli. (2013). ‘Dirty’ and ‘Clean’, and the Dialectic between Facts and Practices. In: Y. Gustafsson, C. Kronqvist & H. Nykänen, eds. Ethics and the Philosophy of Culture: Wittgensteinian Approaches. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 26-43.

Putnam, Hilary. (2001). Rules, attunement, and "applying words to the world": The struggle to understand Wittgenstein's vision oflanguage. In: L. Nagl & C. Mouffe, eds. The legacy of Wittgenstein: pragmatism or deconstruction. Frankfurt am Mam: Peter Lang, pp. 9-24.

Toulmin, Stephen. E. (2003). Return to Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.