جایگاه اصل انتظارات مشروع در سازمان جهانی تجارت

الف-فارسی

کتاب‌ها

- امیدبخش، اسفندیار و دیگران، (1385)، سازمان جهانی تجارت؛ ساختار، قواعد و موافقتنامه‌ها، چاپ اول، تهران: شرکت چاپ و نشر.

- سازمان جهانی تجارت، (1385)، اسناد حقوقی سازمان جهانی تجارت؛ نتایج مذاکرات تجاری چندجانبه دور اوروگوئه، مترجمین مسعود طارم سری و دیگران، چاپ دوم، تهران: موسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های بازرگانی.

- کاتوزیان، ناصر، ( 1375 )، حقوق انتقالی، تعارض قوانین در زمان، چاپ پنجم، تهران: نشر دادگستر.

مقاله‌ها

- انصاری، اعظم و حاجیان، محمد مهدی، (1393)، «اعمال اصول کلی حقوقی در حل وفصل دعاوی اعضای سازمان تجارت جهانی»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، سال دوم، شماره 7.

- زارعی، محمدحسین و بهنیا، مسیح، (1390)، «تأملی بر امکان اعمال اصل انتظار مشروع در دیوان عدالت اداری»، فصلنامه راهبرد، سال 20، شماره 61.

ب- انگلیسی

Books

-            Dae-Won, Kim, (2006), Non-Violation Complaints in WTO Law: Theory and Practice, Berne, Peter Lang. 

-            Panizzon, Marion, (2006), Good Faith in the Jurisprudence of the WTO, Oxford and Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing.

Articles

-            Barak-Erez, Daphne, (2005), “The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations and the Distinction between the Reliance and Expectation Interests”, European Public Law, Vol 11, Issue 4.

-            Cameron, James, Gray, Kevin, (2001), “Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body”, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 50.

-            Cartwright, John, (2006), “Protecting Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel in English Law”, Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 10, No. 3.

-            Cottier, Thomas, N. Scheffer, Krista, (2000), “Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO”, New Directions in International Economic Law, The Hague, Vol. 47.

-            Hadfield, Brigid, (1988), “Judicial Review and the Concept of Legitimate Expectations”, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 2.

-            Manu, Thaddeus, (2016), “Interpreting Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in WTO Jurisprudence in its Application to Compulsory Licensing”, Trade Law & Development, Vol. 8, No. 63.

-            Mitchell, Andrew D., (2007), “The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 10, No. 4.

-            Reinhold, Steven, (2013), “Good Faith in International Law”, UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, No. 2.

-            Robert W., Staiger, Alan, O. Sykes, (2013), “Non-Violations”, Journal of International Economic Law, No. 16.

-            Tate, Pamela, (1989), “Coherence of Legitimate Expectations and the Foundation of Natural Justice”, Monash University Law Review, Vol. 14.

-            Zeitler, Helge Elisabeth, (2005), “Good Faith in The WTO Jurisprudence Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism?”, Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 8, No. 3.

Cases

-            Canada – Autos, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Automotive Industry, Panel Report, WT/DS139/R, WT/DS142/R, adopted 19 June 2000, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS139/AB/R, WT/DS142/AB/R.

-            EC – Asbestos, European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos Containing Products, Panel Report, WT/DS135/R and Add, adopted 5 April 2001, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS135/AB/R.

-            EC – LAN, European Communities – Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment, Panel Report, WT/DS62/R, WT/DS67/R, WT/DS68R/, adopted 22 June 1998, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS62/AB/R, WT/DS67/AB/R, WT/DS68/AB/R, DSR 1998:V.

-            EEC – Oilseeds I, European Economic Community – Payments and Subsidies Paid to Processors and Producers of Oilseeds and Related Animal – Feed Proteins, Panel Report, adopted 25 January 1990,BISD 37S/86.

-            India – Patents, (EC) India – Patent Protection for Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Chemical Products – Complaint by the United States, Panel Report, WT/DS79/R, adopted 22 January 1998,DSR 1998:VI.

-            Italy – Agricultural Machinery, Italy – Discrimination Against Imported Agricultural Machinery, Panel Report, adopted 23 October 1958, BISD 7S/60.

-            Japan – Alcoholic Beverages, Japan – Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, Panel Report, WT/DS8/R, WT/DS10/R, WT/DS11/R, adopted 1 November 1996, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS8/AB/R, WT/DS10/AB/R, WT/DS11/AB/R, DSR 1996: I.

-            Japan – Film, Japan – Measures Affecting Consumer Photographic Film and Paper, Panel Report, WT/DS44/R, adopted 22 April 1998, DSR 1998: IV.

-            Korea – Government Procurement, Korea – Measures Affecting Government Procurement, Panel Report, WT/DS163/R, adopted 19 June 2000.

-            US – Offset Act (Byrd Amendment), United States – Continued Anti –Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, Panel Report, WT/DS217/R, WT/DS234/R, adopted 16 September 2002, as modified by the Appellate Body Report, WT/DS217/AB/R, WT/DS234/AB/R.

-            US – Shrimp, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Panel Report, WT/DS58/R, adopted 6 November 1998, as modified by the Appellate Body Report,WT/DS58/AB/R, DSR 1998:VII.