Management of Common Resources: Market, Government, or Neither? A Review of Water Resources Management Studies in Iran (with an Emphasis on Ostrom’s View) | ||
| پژوهشهای اقتصادی ایران | ||
| Volume 26, Issue 88, October 2021, Pages 89-127 PDF (908.13 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22054/ijer.2021.47477.814 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Zohreh Rezapour* 1; Mohsen Renani2; Hadi Amiri3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 2Professor of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| 3Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Many of the common natural resources of the world are in critical conditions. The solution to this crisis is the development of effective management institutions. However, there is no consensus on these institutions. Some economists believe that creating a privately owned entity can solve the management problems of these resources. Others support the control of resources by the central government. Some institutionalists consider the local management strategy as the solution to this crisis. In this study, an empirical meta-analysis was performed to examine what solution the Iranian studies on the management of water (as a common natural resource) have favored more and what factors they have considered for its success or failure. For this purpose, about 120 articles were collected from the Database of National Publications (Magiran), Noor Specialized Magazines Website (Noormags), Scientific Information Database (SID) of ACECR, and Comprehensive Portal of Humanities using ‘water management’ as the keyword. Seventy-three of these articles were related to the subject of the current study. The results of this research showed that most of these studies (about 70%) used a local participatory management solution and in order to investigate the reasons for its success or failure, they paid more attention to physical factors than institutional rules and arrangements. Thirty percent of the studies supported the market or government solution. In conclusion, this study suggests that more comprehensive approaches such as Ostrom’s analysis be used in future studies to find the most appropriate management method and its effectiveness in analyses so that common resources such as water can be managed more efficiently. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Collective Action; Common Resources; Water Resources Management; Market; Government; Property Rights Approach; Ostram’s Institutional Approach | ||
| References | ||
|
Anderson, T. L. (1983). Water crisis: ending the policy drought. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute. Anderson, T. L. and Hill P. J. (1960). The not so wild, wild west. Stanford Economics and Finance, 1st edition. Bastakoti, R. C., Shivakoti, G. P., & Lebel, L. (2010). Local irrigation management institutions mediate changes drivenby external policy and market pressures in Nepal and Thailand. Environmental Management, 46(3), 411-423. Behera, B. (2009). Explaining the performance of state–community joint forest management in India. Ecological economics, 69(1), 177-185. Bromley, D. W. (1982). Improving irrigated agriculture: Institutional reform and the small farmer. World Bank Working Paper, 531, Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Bromley, D. W. (1984). Property rights and economic incentives for resource and environmental systems. Agricultural Economics Staff Paper Series, 231. Madison: University of Wisconsin. Buchanan, J., and TuIlock, G. (1962). The Calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Chambers, R. (1977). Men and water: The organization and operation of irrigation in green revolution? Technology and change in rice-growing areas of Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka, ed. B. H. Farmer. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Chambers, E. A. (2004). An Introduction to Meta-Analysis with Articles from the journal of educational research (1999–2002). Journal of Educational Research, 98(1), 35–44. Coase, R. H. (1960). The Problem of social cost, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1-44. Coulibaly-Lingani, P., Savadogo, P., Tigabu, M., Oden, P. C. (2011). Factors influencing people's participation in the forest management program in Burkina Faso, west Africa. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(4), 292-302. Demsetz, H. (1964). The exchange and enforcement of property rights. Journal of Law and Economics, 7: 11-26. Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359. Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B. J., Acheson, J. M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human ecology, 18 (1), 1‐19. Field, B. C. (1986). Induced changes in property-rights institutions. Research Paper Series. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics. Gardner, R., Ostrom, E. and Walker, J. (1990). The nature of common-pool resources problems. Rationality and Society, 2(3), 335-358. Glick, T. F. (1970). Irrigation and Society in Medieval Valencia. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Gorton, M., Sauer, J., Peshevski, M., Bosev, D., Shekerinov, D., Quarrie, S. (2009). Water communities in the Republic of Macedonia: An empirical analysis of membership satisfaction and payment behavior. World Development, 37(12), 1951-1963. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248. Harriss, J. (1977). Problems of water management in Hambantota District in green revolution? Technology and change in ricegrowing areas of Tamil Nadu and Sri Lanka, ed. B. H. Farmer. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ito, J. (2012). Collective action for local commons management in rural Yunnan, China: Empirical evidence and hypotheses using evolutionary game theory. Land Economics, 88(1), 181-200. Kiser, Larry L., and Elinor Ostrom. (1982). The three worlds of action. A Metatheoretical Synthesis of Institutional Approaches. In Strategies of political inquiry, ed. Ostrom, E. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage,179-222. Lando, Richard P. (1979). The gift of land: Irrigation and social structure in a Toba Village. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Riverside. Maass, A., and Anderson, R. L. (1986). Desert Shall Rejoice: Conflict, Growth, and Justice in Arid Environments. Malabar, Fla.: Krieger. McKean, M. A (1992). Success on the commons: A comparative examination of institutions for common property resource management, Jornal of Theorical Politics, 4(3), 247-281. Martin, E., and Yoder, R. (1983). Water allocation and resource mobilization for irrigation: A comparison of 'Ikvo systems in Nepal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Nepal Studies Association, Nov. 4-6, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Ostrom, E. (1986). An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice, 48, 3-25. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. (1990). Rules, games, and common‐pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Ostrom, V. (1989). The intellectual crisisin American public administration. 2d ed. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press. Ostrom, V., and Ostrom, E. (1977). Public goods and public choices. In alternatives for delivering public services: Toward hnproved Performance, ed. E. S. Savas, 7-49. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Pradhan, Prachanda. (1983). Water management in Nepal: Predings of a seminar on water management issues. Kathmanda, Agricultural Projects Service Centre. Palanisami, K., and Easter, K. W. (1986). Management, production, and rehabilitation in South Indian irrigation tanks. In Irrigation Investment, Technology, and Management Strategiesfor Development, ed. Easter, K. W. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Poteete, A. R., Janssen, M. A., and Ostrom, E. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Published by Princeton University Press. Sandler, T. (2010). Common-property resources: Privatization, centralization, and hybrid arrangements, Public Choice, 143, 317–324. Schlager, E. and Ostrom, E. (1992). Property‐rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249‐262. Schlager, E. (1994). Fishers’ institutional responses to common‐pool resource dilemmas. In: Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. (Eds.), Rules, games, and common‐pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, pp. 247‐266. Siy, R. (1982). Community resource management: Lessons from the Zanjera. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press. Smith, R. (1981). Resolving the tragedy of the commons by creating private property rights in wildlife, CATO Journal, 1(2), 439-468. Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self governance in irrigation. ICS Press, San Francisco, California. Uphoff, N. (1985). People's participation in water management: Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. In Public Participation in Development Planning and Management, ed. Jean-Claude Garcia-Zamor. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Wittfogel, K. A. (1981). Oriental despotism: A comparative study' of total power. New York: Vintage Books | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 1,345 PDF Download: 901 |
||