شباهت اساسی در نقض کپی‌رایت با تأکید بر رویه قضایی آمریکا

References

• Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, “The Normativety of Copying in Copyright Law”, Duke Law Journal, Vol. 62: 2, (2012).
• Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, Manta Irina D, Ryan, Wilkkinson Tess, “Judging Similarity”, Iowa Law Review, Vol. 100, 14, (2014).
• Chandrachud, Abhinav, “The Idea/Expression Fallacy: Effecting the Traditional and Doctrinaire Limits”, The Law Review, Government Law College, Vol. 4, (2005).
• Cohen, Amy B, “Masking Copyright Decision Making: The Meaninglessness of Substantial Similarity”, University of California, Vol. 20, 719, (1987).
• Dalmau, Gabriel Godoy, “Substantial Similarity: Kohus Got it Right”, Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review, Vol. 6, 2, (2017).
• Fromer, Jeanne C, “An Information Theory of Copyright Law”, Emory Law Journal, Vol. 64, 71, (2014).
• Helfing, Robert F, “Substantially Similarity in Literary Infringement Case: A Chart for Turbid Waterrs”, UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Vol. 21, 1, (2014).
• Hickey, Kevin J, “Reforming Similarity Analysis in Copyright”, Washington University Law Review, Vol. 93, 681, (2016).
• Jones, Richard H, “The Myth of Idea/Expression Dichotomy in Copyright Law”, Pace Law Review, Vol. 10, 551, (1990).
• Lee, Moon Hee, “Seeing’s Insight: Toward a Visual Substantial Similarity Test for Copyright Infringement of Pictorial, Graphic and Sculptural Works”, Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 111, 3, (2017).
• McDonagh, Luck, “Is the Creative Use of Musical Works without a Licence Acceptable under Copyright Law?”, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 43, 4, (2012).
• Parelman, Bruce, “Proving Copyright Infringement of Computer Software: An Analytical Framework”, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 18, (1985).
• Poston, Karen L, “All Puff and No Stuff: Avoiding the Idea/Expression Dichotomy”, Loyola Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 2, )1989(.
• Ros, Vioral, Livadariu, Andrea, “Originality-Condition for Protection of Scientific works”, Nicolae Titulescu University House Romania, Vol. 4, 1, (2014).
• Sprigman, Christopher Jon, Hedrick, Samantha Fink, “The Filtration Problem in Copyright’s Substantially Similarity Test”, Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 23, 3, (2019).
• Wilde, Edward C, “Replacing the Idea/Expression Metaphor with a Market-Based Analysis in Copyright Infringement Actions”, Whittier Law Review, Vol. 16, 3, (1995).
• Versteeg, Russ, “Rethinking Originality”, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 34, (1993).
• Yen, Alfred C, “A First Amendment Perspective on the Idea/Expression Dichotomy and Copyright in a Work’s Total Concept and Feel”, Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 1, 517, (1990).

Cases

• Arnstein v.Porter 154 F.2d 464 (1946).
• Daly v. Plamer 36 How. Pr.206 (1868).
• Dawson v. Hinshow Music Inc, 905 F.2d 731 (1990).
• Feist Publication, Inc v. Rural Telephone Service Co, 499 U.S 340,111 S.Ct 1282 (1991).
• Harper & Row, Publishers Inc v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S (1985).
• Knitwaves, Inc v. Lollytogo Ltd, 104 F3d 353 (1996).
• Narayan Rao v. v Prasad 2 APLJ (1979).
• North Coast Industries v. Jason Maxwell, Inc, 972 F.2d 1031 (1992).
• Novelty Textile Mills v. Joan Fabrics Crop 558 F.2d 1090 (1977).
• Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co, 429 F.2d 1106 (1970).
• Samuel S. Green v. William Bishop.
• Sid & Marty Krofft Television prod, Inc v. Mcdonald’s Crop, 562 F.2d 1157 (1977).
• Warner Bros v. American Broadcasting Company Inc, 720 F.2d 231 (1983).