شاخص های روان سنجی مقیاس ویژگی های عاملیت انسانی : نظریه کلاسیک نمره آزمون و نظریه سوال-پاسخ مدرج

 

 

References

Ayala, R.J.D. (2009). The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory. New York: Guilford Press.

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. ERIC clearinghouse on assessment and evaluation.

Bandura (2018). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency: Pathways and Reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2018, Vol. 13(2) 130 –136. 16.

Bandura, (2008 b). The reconstrual of "free will" from the agentic perspective of social cognitive theory.

Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am J Psychol. 44(9): 1175-84.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology,52,1-26.

Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Stanford University: Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), P.164-180

Bessaha ML. Factor structure of the Kessler psychological distress scale (K6) among emerging adults. Res Soc Work Prac. 2017;27(5):616-624. 17.

Blanchin, M., Hardouin, J. B., Guillemin, F., Falissard, B., & Se ́bille, V. (2013). Power and sample size determination for the group comparison of patient-reported outcomes with rasch family models. PLoS One. 8(2), 1-13.

Bortolotti, S. L.V., Tezza, R., de Andrade, D. F., Bornia, A. C., & de Sousa Júnior, A. F. (2013). Relevance and advantages of using the item response theory. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 47(4), 2341–2360.

Cai, L., Du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (2011). IRTPRO: User guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis: Psychology Press; 2013

David, N., Obhi, S., & Moore, J. W. (2015).  Editorial: Sense of agency: examining awareness of the acting self. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 9.

DeMars, C. (2010). Item response theory. Understanding statistics measurement. City: Oxford University Press.

Edwards, M. C., Houts, C. R., & Cai, L. (2018). A diagnostic procedure to detect departures from local independence in item response theory models. Psychological Methods, 23(1), 138-149.

Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. 2000. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ

Etelapelto, A., Vahasantanen, K., Hokka, P. & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is Agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review 10, 45–65.

 Friston, K (2012). Prediction, perception and agency.Int J Psychophsiol;83(2): 248-52. from:http:/www.googlescholar.com. Accessed 07 February 2013.

Furukawa TA, Kessler RC, Slade T, Andrews G. The performance of the K6 and K10 screening scales for psychological distress in the Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Psychol Med. 2003;33(2):357-362.

Haggard, P, & Tsakiris, M. (2009). The experience of agency feelings, judgments, and responsibility. J Curr Dir Psychol Sci; 18(4): 242-6.

 Haladyna, T.M. (2004). Developing and Validating Multiple-Choice Test Items. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Hambleton, R. K., Van der Linden, W. J., & Wells, C. S. (2010). IRT models for the analysis of polytomously scored data: Brief and selected history of model building advances. In M. L. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models. Published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Hiltin & Elder, G. H. (2007). Agency: An Empirical Model of an Abstract Concept. Advances in Life Course Research, Volume 11, 33–67.

Hitlin, S., & Johnson, M.K (2015). Reconceptualizing agency within the life course: The power of looking ahead. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1429-1472.

Hunter, J., & Cooke, D. (2007). Through autonomy to agency: Giving power to language learners, Prospect, 22(2), 72-88.

Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A. M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2016). Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 5(2): 1-19.

Jiang,S.,Wang,C.,&Weiss,D. (2016). The sample size requirements for estimation of item parameters in the multidimensional graded response model.  Frontiers in Psychology. 7(1), 1-10.

Kawabe, T. (2013). Inferring sense of agency from the quantitative aspect of action outcome. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 407–412.

Kean, J. & Reilly, J. (2014). Item response theory. Handbook for Clinical Research: Design, Statistics and Implementation. (pp195-198). New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing.

Kjell, O.N.E., Nima, A.A., Sikström, S., Archer, T., & Garcia, D. (2013). Iranian and Swedish Adolescents: Differences in Personality Traits and Well-Being, PeerJ 1: e197.

Kline, R.B. Principlesandpracticeofstructuralequationmodeling(3rded.). NewYork: GuilfordPress. (2010).

Le, D. T. (2013). Applying item response theory modeling in educational research.

Maggio, K. M. (2015). Why do you see it that way? The preferences of confrontational behavior as seen through attachment style and facework behavior. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.

Marshal.V.W. (2005).Agency events,and structure at the end of the life course.Advances in Life Course Research, 10, 57-91

Neal DJ, Corbin WR, Fromme K. Measurement of alcohol-related consequences among high school and college students: application of item response models to the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index. Psychol Assess. 2006;18(4):402-414.

Oreg, S, Vakola, M, Armenakis, A. Bozionelos, N, Gonza Lez, L, Hrebickova, M. et al. (2008). Dispositinal Resistance to change:Measurement Equivalence and the Link to Personal Values across 17 Nations. J Applied Psychol; 93(4): 935-44.

Ostini, Remo, and Michael L. Nering. 2006. Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-144. Thousand Oaks, Sage Pubns.

Polito, V, Barnier, A.J, Woody, E.Z (2013). Developing the Sense of Agency Rating Scale (SOARS): an empirical measure of agency disruption in hypnosis. J Conscious Cogn; 22(3): 684-96.

Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory. New York: Springer Verlag.

Salami O.S. (2010). Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, psychological wellbeing and student's attitudes: implications for quality education, European Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 247-257.

Sijtsma, K., Molenaar, W. (2002). Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

Tate R.A comparison of selected empirical methods for assessing the structure of response to test items.Applied Psychological Measurement. 2003; 27(3): 159-203

Thissen, D., Cai, L., & Bock, R. D. (2010). The nominal item response model. In M. Nering & R. Ostini (Eds.), Handbook of polytomous item response theory models (pp. 43-75). New York, NY: Routledge.

Wehmeyer, M. L. (2004). Beyond Self-Determination: Causal Agency Theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Vol. 16, No. 4, 337- 359.

Yoon, H.J. (2011). The development and validation of the assessment of human agency employing Albert Bandura´s human agency theory. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.The Pennsylvania State University.