دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات62
تعداد شماره‌ها2,323
تعداد مقالات19,157
تعداد مشاهده مقاله61,585,532
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله31,231,461
موسوی, سید نجم الدین. (1402). تحلیل اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی با نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 32(108), 183-222. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2022.68573.4168
سید نجم الدین موسوی. "تحلیل اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی با نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 32, 108, 1402, 183-222. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2022.68573.4168
موسوی, سید نجم الدین. (1402). 'تحلیل اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی با نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 32(108), pp. 183-222. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2022.68573.4168
موسوی, سید نجم الدین. تحلیل اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی با نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1402; 32(108): 183-222. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2022.68573.4168

تحلیل اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی با نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز

مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول
مقاله 6، دوره 32، شماره 108، تیر 1402، صفحه 183-222    اصل مقاله (651.73 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/jmsd.2022.68573.4168
نویسنده
سید نجم الدین موسوی*
دانشیار،گروه مدیریت،دانشگاه لرستان،خرم آباد،ایران
چکیده
سبز بودن یکی از موضوعات حساس و اساسی برای فعالیت شرکتها در دنیای پر از رقابت و محدودیتهای قانونی وعرفی بازار است که بتدریج همه حوزه ها از جمله منابع انسانی را دربخواهد گرفت. این پژوهش باهدف بررسی تأثیر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر شهرت سازمانی در صنعت مواد غذایی با توجه به نقش میانجی نوآوری سبز اجرا شده است. این تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی و به لحاظ شیوة گردآوری داده‌ها توصیفی - پیمایشی از نوع همبستگی است. برای سنجش متغیرهای پژوهش از پرسشنامه سرمایه ساختاری سبز هوآنگ و کانگ (2011)، نوآوری سبز ژی و همکاران (2019) و شهرت سازمانی لوما-آهو (2008) استفاده شده است. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها، با استفاده از مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری انجام شد. جامعة آماری شامل شرکتهای بزرگ مواد غذایی ایران است که دارای تنوع محصولات بوده و در ارائه محصولات جدید پیشرو هستند و به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی طبقه بندی 200 شرکت انتخاب شدند. نتایج تحقیق نشان داد روابط مثبتی بین سرمایه ساختاری، نوآوری سبز و شهرت سازمانی وجود دارد. همچنین نوآوری سبز نقش میانجی بین سرمایه ساختاری سبز و شهرت سازمانی ایفا می‌کند. بنابراین تحقیق اثر سرمایه ساختاری سبز بر افزایش نوآوری سبز و شهرت سازمانی شرکتها در این صنعت را تایید می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایه ساختاری سبز؛ نوآوری سبز؛ شهرت سازمانی؛ صنایع غذایی
مراجع
  1. محمدپور زرندی، حسین؛ امیرکبیری، علیرضا؛ کجوری، حمیدرضا (1396). تعیین رابطه شهرت سازمانی و نیات رفتاری شهروندان (مورد مطالعه: مشتریان بانک شهر). فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی اقتصاد و مدیریت شهری، ۵ (۲۰)، ۹۹-۱۱۱.
  2. Aboelmaged, M., Hashem, G. (2019). Absorptive capacity and green innovation adoption in SMEs: The mediating effects of sustainable organisational capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 853-863
  3. Alteren, G.; Tudoran, A.A.(2016). Enhancing export performance: Betting on customer orientation, behavioral commitment, and communication. Bus. Rev, 25, 370–381.
  4. Amores-Salvadó J, Castro GM-d, Navas-López JE. (2014). Green Corporate Image: Moderating the Connection between Environmental Product Innovation and Firm Performance, Journal of Cleaner Production
  5. Arfi, W. B., Hikkerova, L., Sahut, J. M. (2018). External knowledge sources, green innovation and performance. Technological Forecasting and Social change, 129, 210- 220.
  6. Asiaei, K., & Jusoh, R. (2017). Using a robust performance measurement system to illuminate intellectual capital. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 26, 1–19.
  7. Bansal, P. (2005). “Evolving Sustainability: A Longitudinal Study of Corporate Sustainable Development”. Strategic Management Journal, 26, pp. 197-218.
  8. Berry, M. A. and D. A. Rondinelli. (1998). Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial. Academy of Management Executive 12 (2), 38– 50.
  9. Bontis, N. (2001). Asses knowledge assets: A review of the models used to measure intellectual capital. International Journal of Management Review, 3 (1), 4160.
  10. Carpenter, D. P., Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32.
  11. Chang, C.H. & Chen, Y. (2012). The determinants of green intellectual capital. Management Decision, 50 (1), 74 – 94.
  12. Chen, Y. S, Lai, S. B., & Wen, C. T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331–339.
  13. Chen, Y.S., Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T. (2006). The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 331-339.
  14. Chen, Y-S. Chang, C-H. (2013). Utilize structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the influence of corporate environmental ethics: The mediation effect of green human capital. Quality and Quantity, 47, 79-95.
  15. Chen, Y-S. (2008). The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(3), 271-286.
  16. Cheng-Li, H., Fan-Hua, K. (2011). Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 49 (9), 1405-
  17. Delgado-Verde, M., Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2014). Green intellectual capital and environmental product innovation: the mediating role of green social capital. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(3), 261–275.
  18. Fernández, E., Junquera, B., & Ordiz, M. (2003). Organizational culture and human resources in the environmental issue: a review of the literature. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(4), 634–656.
  19. Fleming, L., Sorenson, O. (2004). Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 909–928.
  20. Fombrun, C. J., Foss, C. B. (2001). The reputation quotient, part 3: Five principles of reputation management
  21. Fombrun, C. J., Van Riel, C. B. M. (2004). Fame & Fortune. How succesful companies build winning reputations. Pearson Education, Inc. Prentise Hall.
  22. Fombrun, C. J., Gardberg, N. A., & Sever, J. M. (2000). The Reputation QuotientSM: A multi stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of brand management, 7(4), 241-255.
  23. Fraj-Andrés, E,. Martinez-Salinas, E,. Matute Vallejo, J. (2009). A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firm’s Organizational Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 263–286.
  24. Ghaffar, A., Kahn, W. (2014). Impact of research and development on firm performance. J. Account. Financ. Report. 4 (1), 357–367.
  25. Grunig, J. E., Hung, C. F. (2002), The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: A cognitive, behavioral study. Paper presented at the thAnnual International, Interdisciplinary Public PRSA Educator’s Academy Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida.
  26. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. & Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26 (2), 106-121.
  27. Haneda, S., Ito, K. (2018). Organizational and human resource management and innovation: Which management practices are linked to product and/or process innovation? Research Policy, 47(1), 194 208.
  28. Hart, S. L. (1995). A Natural-Resource-based View of the Firm. Academy of Management Review, 20 (4), 986–1014.
  29. Hsu, Y.H. & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 76 (5), 664–677.
  30. Huang, C. & Kung, F. (2011). Environmental consciousness and intellectual capital management: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 49 (9), 1405-1425
  31. Huang, Y.H. & Kao, M.R. (2004). An empirical study on the relationship of green innovation adoption and organizational environmental performance under stakeholders’ perspective: the model of Lisrel. Sun Yat-Sen Management Review, 12(4), 633-674.
  32. Jardon, C. M., & Dasilva, A. (2017). Intellectual capital and environmental concern in subsistence small businesses. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28(2), 214-230.
  33. Jardon, C. M., & Susana Martos, M. (2012). Intellectual capital as competitive advantage in emerging clusters in Latin America. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13(4), 462-481.
  34. Jeng, S. P. (2011). The Effect of Corporate Reputations on Customer Perceptions and Cross-Buying Intentions. The Service Industries Journal, 31 (6), 851–862.
  35. Kammerer, D. (2009). The Effects of Customer Benefit and Regulation on Environmental Product Innovation. Empirical Evidence from Appliance Manufacturers in Germany. Ecological Economics, 68, 2285-2295.
  36. Kemp, R. & Pearson, P. (2007). Final report of the MEI project measuring eco innovation. Brussels, DG Research of the European Commission, Eurostat, the European Environment Agency (EEA) and the Joint Research Center (JRC) of the European Commission.
  37. Kianto, A., Sáenz, J., & Aramburu, N. (2017). Knowledge-based human resource management practices, intellectual capital and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 81, 11–20.
  38. Kwon, H.-B., & Lee, J. (2019). Exploring the differential impact of environmental sustainability, operational efficiency, and corporate reputation on market valuation in high-tech-oriented firms.
  39. Lai, S.B., Wen, C.T., Chen, Y.S. (2003). The exploration of the relationship between the environmental pressure and the corporate competitive advantage. In: 2003 CSMOT Academic Conference. National Chiao Tung University, Hsin-Chu.
  40. Lange, D., Lee, P. M., & Dai, Y. (2011). Organizational reputation: A review. Journal of Management, 37(1), 153-184.
  41. Lee, C.-C., & Lin, C.-K. (2018). The major determinants of influencing the operating performance from the perspective of intellectual capital: Evidence on CPA industry. Asia Pacific Management Review.
  42. Lee, J., (2012). A global perspective on green sustainability, corporate reputation, and technological strength for firm performance across countries. Distrib. Sci. 10 (8), 15–23. 
  43. Li, D., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, X., & Cao, C. (2018). Impact of quality management on green innovation. Journal of cleaner production, 170, 462-470.
  44. Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The impact of legitimacy pressure and corporate profitability on green innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41-49.
  45. Li, Y., Su, z., & Liu, Y. (2010). Can strategic flexibility help firms profit from product? Technovation, 30(5-6), 300-309.
  46. Lin, R.-J., Tan, K.-H., & Geng, Y. (2013). Market demand, green product innovation, and firm performance: evidence from Vietnam motorcycle industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 101-107.
  47. Luoma-aho, V. (2008). Sector reputation and publ ic organisations. Internat ional Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(5), 446-467.
  48. Mehtap, O., Kokalan, O. (2012). The relationship between corporate reputation and organizational citizenship behavior: a comparative study on TV companies and banks. Published online: @ Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 3609-3619.
  49. Morgan, D. R., Meier, K. J., Kearney, R. C., Hays, S. W., and Birch, H. B. (1981). Reputation and Productivity among U. S. Public Administration and Public Affairs Programs. Public Administration Review, 41(6), 666-673.
  50. Moustaghfir, K. (2009). How knowledge assets lead to a sustainable competitive advantage: are organizational capabilities a missing link? Knowledge Management Research & Practice 7(4), 339-355.
  51. Porter, M. E. & van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review, 73 (5), 120–134.
  52. Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
  53. Raithel, S., & Schwaiger, M. (2015). The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 945-956.
  54. Saha, M.; Darnton,G. (2005). Green Companies or Green Con-Panies: Are Companies Really Green, or Are They Pretending to Be?. Business and Society Review, 110, 117-157.
  55. Salmann, N., & Saives, A. (2005). Indirect networks: anintangibleresourcefor biotechnology innovation. R & D Management, 35 (2), 203–215.
  56. Schiemann, F., Richter, K., & Günther, T. (2015). The relationship between recognised intangible assets and voluntary intellectual capital disclosure. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 240–264.
  57. Shrivastava, P. (1995). Environmental Technologies and Competitive Advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 16(Special issue), 183–200
  58. Tien, S.W., Chung, Y.C., Tsai, C.H. (2005). An Empirical Study on the Correlation Between Environmental Design Implementation and Business Competitive Advantages in Taiwan’s Industries. Technovation, 25, 783-794.
  59. Tseng, C., & Goo, Y. J. Intellectual capital and corporate value in an emerging economy: empirical study of Taiwanese manufacturers. R& D Management, 35(2), 187-201.
  60. Tseng, M.-L., Wang, R., Chiu, A., Geng, Y., & Lin, Y. (2013). Improving performance of green innovation practices under uncertainty. Journal of cleaner production, 40, 71-82.
  61. Vergauwen, P., Van Alem, F. (2005). Annual report intellectual capital diisclosureesin the netherlands, franceand Germany. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6 (1), 89- 104.
  62. Von Zedtwitz, M., Friesike, S., Gassmann, O. (2014). Managing R & D and new product development. In: Dodgson, M., Gann, D.M., Phillips, N. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford University Press, New York, 530–547.
  63. Waddock, S. (2000). The multiple bottom lines of corporate citizenship: Social investing, reputation, and responsibility audits. Business and Society Review, 105(3), 323-345.
  64. Wang, Z., Wang, N., & Liang, H. (2014). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management Decision, 52(2), 230–258.
  65. Wikhamn, W. (2019). Innovation, sustainable HRM and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 76, 102–110.
  66. Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: a content analysis method.  Bus. Res.101, 697–706.
  67. Yusliza, M. Y., Yong, J. Y., Tanveer, M. I., Ramayah, T., Juhari, N. F., Muhammad, Z. (2019). A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance, Journal of Cleaner Production,
  68. Zailani, S., Govindan, K., Iranmanesh, M., Shaharudin, M. R., & Chong, Y. S. (2015). Green innovation adoption in automotive supply chain: the Malaysian case. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1115- 1122.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,376
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 982


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب
login