Guarantees Risk Management in a Financial Institution

Ghasemdokht, Nazanin; Razavi, Hamideh

doi:10.22054/ijer.2023.69705.1132

Obtaining a ranking by the journal of education leadership research from the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology

Obtaining the "A" rating by the Quranic Knowledge Research Journal from the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology

Consultative meeting of officials of scientific journals of Allameh Tabatabai University

The scientific evaluation results of the journals of Allameh Tabataba'i University in the year 1401; 18 titles succeeded in obtaining an "A" rank.

	Guarantees Risk Management in a Financial Institution
پژوهش‌های اقتصادی ایران
Article 5, Volume 28, Issue 95, July 2023, Pages 157-192 PDF (1.62 M)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22054/ijer.2023.69705.1132
Authors
Nazanin Ghasemdokht¹; Hamideh Razavi^* ²
¹M.Sc, Industrial Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
²Associate Professor, Industrial Engineering Department, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract
Overdue claims resulting from the lending process can pose a significant credit risk to financial institutions. To mitigate this risk, institutions often acquire guarantees. However, borrowers may encounter challenges when providing adequate and valid guarantees, particularly guarantees with lower risk. The present research focused on loan credit risk, borrower utility, and liquidity risk of guarantees within a private fund. First, data mining and classification methods were applied to a dataset of loans. The random forest algorithm, with a prediction accuracy of 0.986, was found to be optimal for constructing a guarantees composition model. The guarantees composition involves using multiple types of guarantees to secure a loan. Two models were established to generate guarantee compositions with a maximum default rate of 10%. In testing scenarios, the average risk of total default for acceptable combinations stands at 3.94%, a significant improvement compared to the fund loans’ overall default rate of 6.3%. Furthermore, the proposed model increases borrower utility from 4.22 to 4.6, not only reducing the default rate but also enhancing borrower utility. Introduction When providing loans to customers, banks require guarantees due to insufficient knowledge of customers and the default risk. Obtaining guarantees from borrowers is recognized as a solution to reduce default risk in banks, but its impact on risk reduction depends on various factors. The combination and type of guarantees are among these factors, which have received less attention in the literature. The current state of overdue bank claims in Iran is unfavorable, and if conditions persist, it will lead to significant monetary and financial crises with negative effects on various sectors of the economy. In recent years, the ratio of non-performing loans to total disbursed facilities in Iran has been consistently higher, averaging around 5% to 10% higher than the global average. Reduction of the default risk in loans can decrease the ratio of non-performing loans to total disbursed facilities. The present study first intended to create various combinations of guarantees for each loan, followed by predicting the probability of default for each combination. In line with their priorities, borrowers can then select their desired guarantee composition from a list of acceptable combinations. Methodology To address the research problem, the study identified common classification methods in data mining by relying on published articles in the field of credit risk. Then, a sample dataset of loans from a financial institution was examined, and the data mining process based on classification methods was applied to the dataset. The random forest method, with a prediction accuracy of 0.986, was ultimately chosen as the approach for constructing the guarantee composition model. Using the previous guarantee compositions, the study developed two models by relying on machine learning techniques. These compositions take into account the perspectives of both the financial institution and the borrower. Final Result The two models generate guarantee compositions with a maximum acceptable default rate of 10%. Considering their own priorities circumstances, borrowers can select their desired guarantee composition from the available combinations, which contributes to a reduction in the default rate in the financial institution.
Keywords
Guarantee Composition; Liquidity Risk; Credit Risk; Financial Institution

References
Abdou, H. A., Tsafack, M. D. D., Ntim, C. G., & Baker, R. D. (2016). Predicting creditworthiness in retail banking with limited scoring data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 103, 89-103.DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2016.03.023. Abdou, H., Pointon, J., & El-Masry, A. (2008). Neural nets versus conventional techniques in credit scoring in Egyptian banking. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1275-1292.DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.030 Afsharnia, E. (2021). The effect of Sayad system in reducing the issuance of bounced checks, 4th International Conference and 5th National Conference on Law and Political Science, Tehran.https://civilica.com/doc/1470533.[In Persian] Akkoç, S. (2012). An empirical comparison of conventional techniques, neural networks and the three stage hybrid Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) model for credit scoring analysis: The case of Turkish credit card data. European Journal of Operational Research, 222(1), 168-178, DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.009. Baesens, B., Van Gestel, T., Viaene, S., Stepanova, M., Suykens, J., & Vanthienen, J. (2003). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring. Journal of the operational research society, 54(6), 627-635. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4101754. Basel, I. I. (2004). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Bank for international settlements. BIS Economic Papers, (46).DOI:10.4236/me.2012.37109.‏ Bekhet, H. A., & Eletter, S. F. K. (2014). Credit risk assessment model for Jordanian commercial banks: Neural scoring approach. Review of Development Finance, 4(1), 20-28, DOI:10.1016/j.rdf.2014.03.002. Berger, A. N., Espinosa-Vega, M. A., Frame, W. S., & Miller, N. H. (2011). Why do borrowers pledge collateral? New empirical evidence on the role of asymmetric information. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(1), 55-70, DOI:10.1016/j.jfi.2010.01.001. Chang, S., Kim, S. D., & Kondo, G. (2015). Predicting default risk of lending club loans. Machine Learning, 1-5. http://cs229.stanford.edu/proj2015/199_report.pdf. Chang, Y. C., Chang, K. H., & Wu, G. J. (2018). Application of eXtreme gradient boosting trees in the construction of credit risk assessment models for financial institutions. Applied Soft Computing, 73, 914-920, DOI:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.09.029. Davydenko, S. A., & Franks, J. R. (2008). Do bankruptcy codes matter? A study of defaults in France, Germany, and the UK. The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 565-608, DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01325.x.‏ Degryse, H., Karapetyan, A., & Karmakar, S. (2021). To ask or not to ask? Bank capital requirements and loan collateralization. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(1), 239-260.DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.017. Demšar, J., Curk, T., Erjavec, A., Gorup, Č., Hočevar, T., Milutinovič, M., ... & Zupan, B. (2013). Orange: data mining toolbox in Python. the Journal of machine Learning research, 14(1), 2349-2353. https://jmlr.org/papers/volume14/demsar13a/demsar13a.pdf. Dzik-Walczak, A., & Heba, M. (2021). An implementation of ensemble methods, logistic regression, and neural network for default prediction in Peer-to-Peer lending. Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci: časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu, 39(1), 163-197. DOI: ‏ ://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2021.1.163. Hand, D. J., & Henley, W. E. (1997). Statistical classification methods in consumer credit scoring: a review. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 160(3), 523-541, https://www.jstor.org/stable/2983268. He, H., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2018). A novel ensemble method for credit scoring: Adaption of different imbalance ratios. Expert Systems with Applications, 98, 105-117, DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.012. Imtiaz, S., & Brimicombe, A. J. (2017). A better comparison summary of credit scoring classification. International journal of advanced computer science and applications, 8(7), DOI:10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080701. Iran bank website, www.worldbank.org (2022). Karimi Vardanjani, & Hassanzadeh. (2021). Extraction and ranking of the factors causing the outstanding claims of the banking system and providing suggested solutions (1390-1398). Financial Management Strategy, 9(2), 63-41, https://sid.ir/paper/960456/fa. [In Persian] Khoshnod, Z. (2019). Prerequisites for the functioning of the centralized system for the registration of movable assets in the promotion of banks' risk management and access to credit. the process, 85 and 86, 45-69, https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1831571. [In Persian] Kumar, M., & Yadav, G. C. (2013). Liquidity risk management in bank: a conceptual framework. AIMA journal of management & research, 7(2/4), 0974-497.https://apps.aima.in/ejournal_new/articlesPDF/Manish-Kumar.pdf. Lahsasna, A., Ainon, R. N., & Teh, Y. W. (2010). Credit Scoring Models Using Soft Computing Methods: A Survey. Int. Arab J. Inf. Technol., 7(2), 115-123. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220413948_Credit_Scoring_Models_Using_Soft_Computing_Methods_A_Survey. Lee, T. S., Chiu, C. C., Lu, C. J., & Chen, I. F. (2002). Credit scoring using the hybrid neural discriminant technique. Expert Systems with applications, 23(3), 245-254.DOI:10.1016/S0957-4174(02)00044-1. Love, I., Martínez Pería, M. S., & Singh, S. (2016). Collateral registries for movable assets: does their introduction spur firms’ access to bank financing?. Journal of Financial Services Research, 49(1), 1-37.DOI: 10.1007/s10693-015-0213-2.‏ Mahapatra, B. (2012). Implications of Basel III for capital, liquidity and profitability of banks. RBI Monthly Bulletin. https://www.bis.org/review/r120305b.pdf. Malekipirbazari, M., Aksakalli, V. (2015). Risk assessment in social lending via random forests. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 4621–4631. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.001 Mehrabi,L. (2014). statistics of non-current claims in the country's banking system. Economic News Quarterly, 144, 1394, 131-135. https://www.noormags.ir/view/ar/articlepage/1195710. [In Persian] Mirza, N., Rahat, B., Naqvi, B., & Rizvi, S. K. A. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 on corporate solvency and possible policy responses in the EU. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2020.09.002. Mohammadi, M., Karimzadeh, M., & Mahdi, B. (2019). the probability of default of the first small loan bank in Herat province Afghanistan. Economic Modeling, 14, 79-100. https://sid.ir/paper/402625/fa. [In Persian] Polikar, R. (2006). Ensemble based systems in decision making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine, 6(3), 21-45. DOI:10.1109/MCAS.2006.1688199. Rashid, A., & Jabeen, S. (2016). Analyzing performance determinants: Conventional versus Islamic banks in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(2), 92-107, DOI: 10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.002. Sedihgi, A.(2020). Analyzing risk of default of loans by considering behavioral payback. M. Sc. Thesis. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. [In Persian] Sezawar, Khazaei, & Islamian. (2021). Examining the phenomenon of bank arrears and comparing it with some countries (with an emphasis on the role of the law on usury-free banking operations in Iran). Quarterly journal of economic research and policies, 29(97), 263-282. http://qjerp.ir/article-1-2748-fa.html. [In Persian] Steijvers, T., Voordeckers, W., & Vanhoof, K. (2010). Collateral, relationship lending and family firms. Small Business Economics, 34(3), 243-259, DOI:10.1007/s11187-008-9124-z. Tarrahian, A., & Asadi, S. (2018). Development of the Basel legal capital model in economic recession conditions. Iranian Journal of Economic Research, (76)23, 159-184, https://doi.org/10.22054/ijer.2018.9516. [In Persian] Trad, N., Trabelsi, M. A., & Goux, J. F. (2017). Risk and profitability of Islamic banks: A religious deception or an alternative solution?. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 40-45, DOI: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.09.001. Tsai, K., Ramiah, S., & Singh, S. (2014). Peer lending risk predictor. CS229 Autumn, DOI:10.13140/2.1.4810.6567. Tsai, M. C., Lin, S. P., Cheng, C. C., & Lin, Y. P. (2009). The consumer loan default predicting model–An application of DEA–DA and neural network. Expert Systems with applications, 36(9), 11682-11690, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.009. Wang, G., Hao, J., Ma, J., & Jiang, H. (2011). A comparative assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Expert systems with applications, 38(1), 223-230, DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.048. World bank website, www.worldbank.org (2022). Wu, D., & Olson, D. L. (2010). Enterprise risk management: coping with model risk in a large bank. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 61(2), 179-190, DOI:10.1057/jors.2008.144. Yeh, I. C., & Lien, C. H. (2009). The comparisons of data mining techniques for the predictive accuracy of probability of default of credit card clients. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 2473-2480.DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.12.020. Zheng, C., & Zhang, J. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the efficiency of microfinance institutions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 71, 407-423, DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2020.09.016.
Statistics Article View: 692 PDF Download: 553

Related Links

News

Guarantees Risk Management in a Financial Institution