آموزه‌های پرونده فیلیپ موریس علیه اروگوئه در زمینه ضرورت تغییر رویکرد معاهدات سرمایه‌گذاری ایران نسبت به سلب مالکیت از صاحبان اموال فکری

References

 Book

 - R. Dolzer & C. Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law, First Edition (London: Oxford Publication International Law, 2008).

Articles

• Cairney, Paul, Mamudu, Hadii & Studlar Donley, “Global Tobacco Control – Power, Policy, Governance and Transfer”, Political Studies Review, Vol. 13, Issue 2, (2012).
• Clifton, Conrad, “Attacking Tobacco: Philip Morris International V. Uruguay”, (2017), Available at SSRN: https:// ssrn. com/ abstract= 2941581 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2941581.
• Gildemester, Arno E, “Burlington Resources, Inc V Republic of Ecuador: How Much is Too Much: When Taxation Tantamount to Expropriation?”, ICSID Review, Vol. 29, Issue 2, (2014).
• Halpern, Michaela S., “The Great Battle of Intellectual Property Versus State Sovereignty – Is Philip Morris V Uruguay a Good Referee?”, (2018), Available at SSRN: https:// ssrn. com/ abstract= 3333071 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333071.
• Hepburn, Jarrod & Nottage, Luke R., “Case Note: Philip Morris Asia V Australia”, The Journal of World Investment and Trade, Vol. 18, (2016), No. 2, pp. 307-319, Available at SSRN: https:// ssrn. com/ abstract= 2842065 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2842065.
• McGrady, Benn, “Implications of Ongoing Trade and Investment Disputes Concerning Tobacco: Philip Morris v. Uruguay”, (2011), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2046261.
• Melillo, Margherita, “Evidentiary Issues in Philip Morris V Uruguay: The Role of the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control and Lessons for NCD Prevention”, Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 21, Issue 5, (2020).
• Mitchell, Andrew D., “Tobacco Packaging Measures Affecting Intellectual Property Protection Under International Investment Law: The Claims Against Uruguay and Australia”, The New Intellectual Property of Health: Beyond Plain Packaging, (2016), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2863335.
• Mostafa, Be, “The Sole Effects Doctrine, Police Powers and Indirect Expropriation under International Law”, AUSTL. INT’L L.J., Vol. 15, Issue 12, (2008).
• Roberts, A., “Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System”, American Journal of International Law, 107(1), (2012).
• Taylor, Allyn L, “An International Regulatory Strategy for Global Tobacco Control”, Yale J Intl L, 21, (1996).
• Unctad, “Expropriation: UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II”, United Nations ,(2012).
• Upreti, Pratyush Nath, “Philip Morris V Uruguay: A Breathing Space for Domestic IP Regulation”, European Intellectual Property Review E.I.P.R., 40(4), (2018).
• Vandevelde, Kenneth J., “The Political Economy of a Bi-lateral Investment Treaty”, AM. J. INT’L L, 92, (1998).
• Voon, Tania & Mitchell, Andrew D., “Philip Morris Vs. tobacco Control: Two Wins for Public Health, But Uncertainty Remain”, Columbia FDI Perspectives on Topical Foreign Direct Investment Issues, No. 182, (2016).
• Voon, T. S. L. “Philip Morris V Uruguay: Implications for Public Health”, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 18, Issue 2, (2017).
• Weiler, Todd, “Philip Morris Vs. Uruguay an Analysis of Tobacco Control Measures in the Context of International Investment Law”, Report #1 for Physicians for a Smoke Free Canada, (2010), available at: http:// arbitrationlaw. com/ files/ free_ pdfs/ 2010- 07-28_-_expert_opinion.pdf.

- Yang, Pei-Kan, “The Margin of Appreciation Debate over Novel Cigarette Packaging Regulations in Philip Morris V. Uruguay A Step toward a Balanced Standard of Review in Investment Disputes”, Brill Open Law, 7(1), (2018).

Documents

• Agreement on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments between the Government of the Republic of Cyprus and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, (2009).
• Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay on the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments, (1988).
• Agreement between the Government of Hong Kong and the Government of Australia for the Promotion and Protection of Investments, (1993).
• Agreement on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments between the Government of the Republic of Singapore and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, (2016).
• Agreement between Japan and the Islamic Republic of Iran on Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investment, (2016).
• Bilateral Investment Treaty between Islamic Republic of Iran and Russian Federation, (2015).
• Bilateral Investment Treaty between Islamic Republic of Iran and France, (2003).

Cases

• Biloune and Marine Drive Complex Ltd. v. Ghana Investments Centre and the Government of Ghana, (Investment Agreement), Award, 27 October 1989, 95 ILR 183.
• Case Concerning the Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland), 1928 PCIJ (Ser. A), No. 17.
• Compañiá de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A. V. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/97/3 (formerly Compañía de Aguas del Aconquija, S.A. and Compagnie Générale des Eaux v. Argentine Republic).
• Eli Lilly and Company v. The Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2; Award: 16 March (2017).
• Metalclad Corporation V. The United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB (AF)/97/1.
• Phelps Dodge Corp. and Overseas Private Investment Corp. V. the Islamic Republic of Iran, IUSCT Case No. 99.
• Philip Morris v Uruguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, (2016).
• Philip Morris Asia Limited V. the Commonwealth of Australia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No. 2012-12.
• Southern Pacific Properties (Middle East) Limited v. Arab Republic of Egypt, ICSID Case No. ARB/84/3.
• Tippetts, Abbett, McCarthy, Stratton V. TAMS-AFFA Consulting Engineers of Iran, IUSCT Case No. 7.
• Total S.A. v. The Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/04/01.