| تعداد نشریات | 60 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,185 |
| تعداد مقالات | 17,683 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 54,292,859 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 28,418,340 |
Intercultural and Interdisciplinary Analysis of Engagement Markers in Academic Writing: Contrasting Native and Non-native (Iranian) Authorship in Hard and Soft Sciences Research Articles | ||
| Issues in Language Teaching | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 02 شهریور 1403 | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/ilt.2024.77783.827 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Parviz Ajideh1؛ Mohammad Zohrabi* 2؛ Rougia Oghbatalab3 | ||
| 1Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian & Foreign Languages, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 2Department of English Language, Faculty of Persian Literature & Foreign Languages, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 3Faculty of Persian literature and Foreign languages, university of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In academic discourse across diverse fields, the cultivation of authorial competence in crafting compelling and persuasive texts is of paramount importance. Scholars in the field of linguistics, particularly those involved in discourse analysis, have been attentive to this necessity. Within the realm of academic writing, the strategic utilization of engagement markers plays a pivotal role in achieving persuasive communication and fostering reader engagement. The cultural positioning of academic writers is often reflected in the incorporation of these linguistic elements within written discourse. This study undertook an examination of 60 research articles spanning the domains of hard and soft sciences, with a focus on discerning potential disparities in the employment of engagement markers between two distinct cohorts of authors: native English speakers and non-native Iranian writers. Employing Hyland's (2005b) model of engagement markers as an analytical framework, the study sought to ascertain the frequency of these linguistic devices within academic research articles produced by the aforementioned groups. The findings of the analysis revealed significant differences in the overall and categorical distribution of engagement markers in the scholarly works of native English and non-native Iranian authors across hard and soft science disciplines. These differences may be ascribed to the cultural positioning of academic writers or the potential lack of familiarity with the established conventions of English rhetoric, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics among non-native Iranian authors. The implications of these findings are significant, as they can inform the development of pedagogical materials aimed at enhancing the academic writing proficiency of authors. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| engagement markers؛ hard sciences؛ interactional metadiscourse؛ soft sciences | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 796 |
||