طراحی و اعتبار یابی محیط یادگیری غنی شده به منظور ارتقای مهارت حل مسئله دانش آموزان استعداد درخشان

Abolghasemi, M., Sheikhi, A., Zainalipour, H., & Asareh, A. (2017). Investigating the principles of designing optimal evaluation strategies among gifted students in Isfahan city: A combined study. Scientific Research Quarterly of Teaching and Research, 6(1), 25-41. [In Persian]

Abu, N. K., Akkanat, Ç., & Gökdere, M. (2017). Teachers' views about the education of gifted students in regular classrooms. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 7(2), 87-109.

Akhan, N. E., Çiçek, S., & Kocaağa, G. (2022). Critical and creative perspectives of gifted students on global problems: Global climate change. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101131

Alabbasi, A. M. A., Sultan, Z. M., Karwowski, M., Cross, T. L., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2023). Self-efficacy in gifted and non-gifted students: A multilevel meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 210, 112244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2023.112244

Bazargan Harandi, A. (2021). An introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods: Common approaches in behavioral sciences (4th ed.). Didavar. [In Persian]

Bennett, L., & Folley, S. (2020). Dashboard literacy: Understanding students' response to learning analytic dashboards. In Mobility, data and learner agency in networked learning (pp. 69-82). Springer.

Böhmová, H., & Roštejnská, M. (2009). Chemistry for gifted and talented: On-line course on talnet. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 11, 14-21.

Dai, Z., Xiong, J., Zhao, L., & Zhu, X. (2023). Smart classroom learning environment preferences of higher education teachers and students in China: An ecological perspective. Heliyon, 9(6), e16769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16769

Eichmann, B., Greiff, S., Naumann, J., Brandhuber, L., & Goldhammer, F. (2020). Exploring behavioural patterns during complex problem-solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 933-956. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12451

Eslami, Z. (2012). Assessment of the educational needs of gifted high school students in the city of Birjand in order to enrich their curricula [Master's thesis, Birjand University]. [In Persian]

Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers & Education, 50(3), 1069-1083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.004

Gyarmathy, É., & Senior, J. (2018). The inclusion of multiple exceptional gifted students in talent development programmes: Interaction synthesis of both provision form and content. Gifted Education International, 34(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429416656500

Homan, H. A. (2013). A practical guide to qualitative research. Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities (Samt). [In Persian]

Hossein Khanzadeh, A., Hemti Alamdarlou, G., Babaei, M., & Babaei, Z. (2011). Examining the attitude of teachers and parents regarding the educational performance of gifted middle school students in Rasht city in 2009-2019. Quarterly Journal of Psychology of Exceptional People, 1(3), 23-53. [In Persian]

Housand, A. M., Housand, B. C., & Renzulli, J. S. (2021). Using the Schoolwide Enrichment Model with technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003239468

Ivarsson, L. (2023). Principals' perceptions of gifted students and their education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100400

Jakubakynov, B., Berechikidze, I., Kartashova, O., & Kochetkova, G. (2021). RETRACTED: Gifted student's creativity: The role of preliminary orientation and individual learning strategies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100883

Jalili, A., Hejazi, M., Intisar Fomani, G., & Marvotti, Z. (2017). The relationship between metacognition and academic performance with mediation of problem solving. Child Mental Health Quarterly, 5(1), 80-92. [In Persian]

Jawaid, I., Javed, M. Y., Jaffery, M. H., Akram, A., Safder, U., & Hassan, S. (2020). Robotic system education for young children by collaborative-project-based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22184

Jordan, S., & Pereira, N. (2009). Rube goldbergineering: Lessons in teaching engineering design to future engineers. Journal of STEM Education, 10(3-4), 13-21.

Karyotaki, M., & Drigas, A. (2016). Latest trends in problem solving assessment. International Journal of Recent Contributions from Engineering, Science & IT (iJES), 4(2), 4-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3991/ijes.v4i2.5800

Kennedy, K., & Farley, J. (2018). Counseling gifted students: School-based considerations and strategies. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(3), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2018336194

Kolbasi, A. (2011). Evaluation of the curriculum of schools of brilliant talents in middle school and the current process of identifying gifted students in order to provide a good model [Doctoral dissertation, University of Isfahan]. [In Persian]

Mayer, R. E. (2013). Designing instruction for constructivist learning. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models (pp. 141-159). Routledge.

Mutlu, G. (2017). Teaching gifted students through authentic instruction: Reflections from the EFL teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 14(4), 3663-3675.

Nacaroğlu, O., & Bektaş, O. (2023). The effect of the flipped classroom model on gifted students' self-regulation skills and academic achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101244

Ozcan, D., & Bicen, H. (2016). Giftedness and technology. Procedia Computer Science, 102, 630-634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.453

Rahman, B. L. (2018). Application of technology for gifted and talented approach in education: A review of best practices and cognitive research. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36503.21925

Renzulli, J. F. (2009). The empire strikes back: Redefining the role of gifted education in the 21st century. In 18th Biennial World Conference: The World Council for Gifted and Talented Children, Vancouver.

Schindler, M., & Rott, B. (2017). Networking theories on giftedness—What we can learn from synthesizing Renzulli's domain general and Krutetskii's mathematics-specific theory. Education Sciences, 7(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010006

Schult, J., Stadler, M., Becker, N., Greiff, S., & Sparfeldt, J. R. (2017). Home alone: Complex problem solving performance benefits from individual online assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.054

Seif, A. (2009). Educational psychology. Doran. [In Persian]

Shokohi Yekta, M., & Parand, A. (2012). Psychology and gifted education. Timurzadeh - Tabib. [In Persian]

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418057

Tavabi, L. (2011). Examining and comparing metacognitive strategies among gifted and normal high school female students [Master's thesis, Zanjan University]. [In Persian]

Tofani Nejad, E. (2017). Designing an educational model of a learning environment enriched with a virtual social network and its effect on the learning rate and social skills of students with hearing impairment in the science course [Doctoral dissertation, Allameh Tabatabai University]. [In Persian]

Troyer, J. A., Tost, J. R., Yoshimura, M., LaFontaine, S. D., & Mabie, A. R. (2012). Teaching students how to meditate can improve level of consciousness and problem solving ability. *Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69*, 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.394

van der Eem, M., van Drie, J., Brand-Gruwel, S., & van Boxtel, C. (2023). Students' evaluation of the trustworthiness of historical sources: Procedural knowledge and task value as predictors of student performance. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2022.05.001

Wagner, K. K., & Dole, S. (2014). Social media in higher education: Using wiki for online gifted education courses. In Handbook of research on transnational higher education (pp. 730-750). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch037

Wang, C., Vemula, S., & Frye, M. (2020). Out-of-school time STEM: Teach programming using python for high school girls. IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC49744.2020.9397812

Wilhelm, O., & Kyllonen, P. (2021). To predict the future, consider the past: Revisiting Carroll (1993) as a guide to the future of intelligence research. Intelligence, 89, 101585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101585

Zaraii Zavarki, E., Rostaminejad, M., & Izzi, M. (2013). Re-architecting higher education for students with special educational needs based on the principles of global design for learning. Psychology of Exceptional People, 1(1), 1-113. [In Persian]

Zaraii Zavarki, E., Velayati, E., & Moradi, R. (2017). Special education with technology approach. Rosh Culture. [In Persian]

Zimlich, S. L. (2015). Using technology in gifted and talented education classrooms: The teachers' perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 14, 101-124. https://doi.org/10.28945/2157

Zub, E. H. (1999). Environmental perception. In Encyclopedia of earth science (pp. 1-120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4494-1_119