دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات60
تعداد شماره‌ها2,197
تعداد مقالات17,830
تعداد مشاهده مقاله54,810,362
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله28,678,737
Mohammad Hosseinpur, Rasoul, Bagheri Nevisi, Reza, Mikhak, Mohammad Bagher, Lowni, Abdolreza. (1403). Representation of Politeness Markers across Different Measures of Pragmatic Knowledge. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), -. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2025.75814.803
Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur; Reza Bagheri Nevisi; Mohammad Bagher Mikhak; Abdolreza Lowni. "Representation of Politeness Markers across Different Measures of Pragmatic Knowledge". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, , , 1403, -. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2025.75814.803
Mohammad Hosseinpur, Rasoul, Bagheri Nevisi, Reza, Mikhak, Mohammad Bagher, Lowni, Abdolreza. (1403). 'Representation of Politeness Markers across Different Measures of Pragmatic Knowledge', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, (), pp. -. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2025.75814.803
Mohammad Hosseinpur, Rasoul, Bagheri Nevisi, Reza, Mikhak, Mohammad Bagher, Lowni, Abdolreza. Representation of Politeness Markers across Different Measures of Pragmatic Knowledge. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1403; (): -. doi: 10.22054/ilt.2025.75814.803

Representation of Politeness Markers across Different Measures of Pragmatic Knowledge

Issues in Language Teaching
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 19 بهمن 1403
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/ilt.2025.75814.803
نویسندگان
Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur* 1؛ Reza Bagheri Nevisi2؛ Mohammad Bagher Mikhak1؛ Abdolreza Lowni3
1University of Qom
2English Department, Faculty of Humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
3Allameh Tabatabai University
چکیده
The question of whether, and to what extent, different measures of pragmatic knowledge mirror students' capabilities as represented in their authentic application of language has been an important consideration in the vicinity of interlanguage pragmatics. To examine the production of politeness markers, as defined by House and Kasper's (1981) seminal work, this study compared and contrasted language learners' performance across four different measures of pragmatic competence: Written Discourse Completion Test, Oral Discourse Completion Test, Role-play, and Natural Methodology in an EFL setting. Furthermore, the requests made by 27 learners in natural situations and by means of WDCT, ODCT, and Role-play with similar characteristics were analyzed. The results revealed that hesitators enjoyed high prevalence in Natural Methodology and consultative devices and scope-stators were more popular in the WDCT, ODCT, and Role-play suggesting, regardless of some minor similarities, significant disparities between the three conventional data-gathering techniques and Natural methodology. The investigation exhibits that Natural Methodology might not necessarily be the ideal pragmatic measure to truly represent all politeness markers. WDCT, ODCT, and Role-Play could be more appropriate to draw on learners' explicit/declarative knowledge, though Natural methodology might be more advantageous to capitalize on learners' automated/procedural knowledge.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Natural methodology؛ politeness markers؛ ODCT؛ Role-play؛ WDCT
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 681


login