Allameh Tabataba'i University

 News

Fallahpour, F., roodsaz, H., Aslipour, H., Khanmohammadi, H. (2025). Theoretical Framework of the Causes of Non-Compliance with Digital Social Responsibility by Organizational Employees and the Coping Strategies. , 34(116), 51-86. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2025.81446.4515
Farhad Fallahpour; habib roodsaz; Hossein Aslipour; Hadi Khanmohammadi. "Theoretical Framework of the Causes of Non-Compliance with Digital Social Responsibility by Organizational Employees and the Coping Strategies". , 34, 116, 2025, 51-86. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2025.81446.4515
Fallahpour, F., roodsaz, H., Aslipour, H., Khanmohammadi, H. (2025). 'Theoretical Framework of the Causes of Non-Compliance with Digital Social Responsibility by Organizational Employees and the Coping Strategies', , 34(116), pp. 51-86. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2025.81446.4515
Fallahpour, F., roodsaz, H., Aslipour, H., Khanmohammadi, H. Theoretical Framework of the Causes of Non-Compliance with Digital Social Responsibility by Organizational Employees and the Coping Strategies. , 2025; 34(116): 51-86. doi: 10.22054/jmsd.2025.81446.4515

Theoretical Framework of the Causes of Non-Compliance with Digital Social Responsibility by Organizational Employees and the Coping Strategies

مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول
Article 2, Volume 34, Issue 116, July 2025, Pages 51-86    PDF (923.22 K)
Document Type: Research Paper
DOI: 10.22054/jmsd.2025.81446.4515
Authors
Farhad Fallahpour* 1; habib roodsaz2; Hossein Aslipour2; Hadi Khanmohammadi2
1PhD Student, Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i, Tehran, Iran
2Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The current research is of an applied type and is included in the category of mixed research. The research data has been done with library method as well as semi-structured interviews. the theme analysis method was used and in the quantitative phase, the ISM method was used to level the causes of non-compliance with digital social responsibility. The statistical population is all the experts in the field of organizational behavior and social responsibility in the executive bodies of Mazandaran province, which was used in the qualitative phase with the snowball method and in the quantitative phase with the targeted method. Data analysis was done using MAXQDA and Excel software. In the following, the research strategies are obtained according to the opinion of experts and the summary of the research and are prioritized by the IPA method. The results of the research showed that in total, four overarching themes were identified: weakness of organizational culture and training, weakness of organizational management and structure, weakness of organizational technology, and organizational pressures and tensions. Also, 9 main strategies were determined that action orientation and implementation of all rules, laws and strategies related to digital social responsibility by managers have been more important
Keywords
Digital social responsibility; employees of the organization; executive bodies of Mazandaran province; rooting and strategies
References
  1. Arnulf, J. K., & Larsen, K. R. (2020). Culture blind leadership research: how semantically determined survey data may fail to detect cultural differences. Frontiers in psychology, 11, 487924.
  2. Asemah, E. S., Nwaoboli, E. P., & Nwoko, Q. T. (2022). Textual analysis of select social media hate speech messages against clergymen in Nigeria. GVU Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 7(2), 1-14.
  3. Atkinson, R., & Ayres, T. (Eds.). (2022). Shades of deviance: A primer on crime, deviance and social harm. Taylor & Francis.
  4. Barnhill, C. R., & Smith, N. L. (2022). Organizational behavior and digital transformation in sport. In The Routledge Handbook of Digital Sport Management(pp. 7-21). Routledge.
  5. Brock Baskin, M. E., Hart, T. A., Bajaj, A., Gerlich, R. N., Drumheller, K. D., & Kinsky, E. S. (2023). Subjective norms and social media: predicting ethical perception and consumer intentions during a secondary crisis. Ethics & Behavior, 33(1), 70-88.
  6. Buford, C. (2022). The Dark Triad and Dark Behaviors: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Social Networking Sites, Deviant Behaviors, and the Dark Triad (Doctoral dissertation, Barry University).
  7. Caraiani, C., Lungu, C. I., Dascalu, C., & Stoian, C. A. (2023). The impact of telework on organisational performance, behaviour, and culture: Evidence from business services industry based on employees’ perceptions. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(2). 21-40.
  8. Chen, Q., Hu, J., Zhang, W., Evans, R., & Ma, X. (2023). Employee use of public social media: Theories, constructs and conceptual frameworks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(9), 855-879.
  9. Chen, Q., Hu, J., Zhang, W., Evans, R., & Ma, X. (2023). Employee use of public social media: Theories, constructs and conceptual frameworks. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(9), 855-879.
  10. Cho, H., Cannon, J., Lopez, R., & Li, W. (2022). Social media literacy: A conceptual framework. New media & society, 14614448211068530.
  11. Cogenli M.Z. (2023). Organizational behavior in the digital world, Nova Science Publishers.
  12. Doncel-Martín, I., Catalan-Matamoros, D., & Elías, C. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and public diplomacy as formulas to reduce hate speech on social media in the fake news era. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 21(3), 1-13.
  13. Erarslan, I. (2023). The deep technology wave and adaptation of businesses to the digitalization process: Europe as an example, Nova Science Publishers.
  14. Exner-Cortens, D., Baker, E., & Craig, W. (2023). Canadian adolescents’ experiences of dating violence: Associations with social power imbalances. Journal of interpersonal violence, 38(1-2), 1762-1786.
  15. Kabiri, S., Choi, J., Kruis, N., Shadmanfaat, S. M., & Lee, J. (2022). Social Concern as a Means of Understanding the Risk of Workplace Deviance. Deviant Behavior, 43(8), 939-958.
  16. Kefala, A. (2021). Social media effects and self-harm behaviors among young people: theoretical and methodological challenges. Journal of education innovation and communication, 3(2). 13-26.
  17. Kellerman, K., & Punamäki, R. L. (2023). The role of attachment security in the development of aggression in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 51(2), 376-389.
  18. Khattak, A., & Yousaf, Z. (2022). Digital social responsibility towards corporate social responsibility and strategic performance of hi-tech SMEs: customer engagement as a mediator. Sustainability, 14(1), 1-16.
  19. Kohnke, O., Nieland, T., Straatmann, T., & Mueller, K. (2023). How do management factors influence digital adoption in the case of a large-scale digital transformation project–A process perspective. Journal of Management & Organization, 1-21.
  20. Kong, D., & Liu, B. (2023). Digital Technology and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 1-27.
  21. Lian, H., Huai, M., Farh, J. L., Huang, J. C., Lee, C., & Chao, M. M. (2022). Leader unethical pro-organizational behavior and employee unethical conduct: Social learning of moral disengagement as a behavioral principle. Journal of Management, 48(2), 350-379.
  22. Liu, X., & Lin, K. L. (2020). Green organizational culture, corporate social responsibility implementation, and food safety. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 585435.
  23. Mihale-Wilson, C., Hinz, O., van der Aalst, W., & Weinhardt, C. (2022). Corporate digital responsibility: Relevance and opportunities for business and information systems engineering. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 64(2), 127-132.
  24. Mohamed, F. A. (2022). The Role of Social Responsibility in the Digital Public Relations Age. In Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Finance and Sustainable Technology: Proceedings of ICGER 2021 1 (pp. 480-492). Springer International Publishing.
  25. Okazaki, S., Plangger, K., West, D., & Menéndez, H. D. (2020). Exploring digital corporate social responsibility communications on Twitter. Journal of Business Research, 117, 675-682.
  26. Özsungur, F. (Ed.). (2022). Conflict Management in Digital Business: New Strategy and Approach. Emerald Publishing Limited.
  27. Poshakrishna, P., & Akeugkahraraunnyarrath, N. (2023). Corporate Social Responsibility Through social media on Tourism Industry. RATANABUTH JOURNAL, 5(1), 588-604.
  28. Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2022). Consumers’ Attitude towards Digital Social Responsibility: Impacts on Electronic Word of Mouth and Purchase Intention. Emerging Science Journal, 6(1), 64-74.
  29. Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2022). Understanding digital social responsibility in the social media context: evidence from Thailand. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 7(1), 1-14.
  30. Quiles‐Soler, C., Martínez‐Sala, A. M., & Monserrat‐Gauchi, J. (2023). Fashion industry's environmental policy: Social media and corporate website as vehicles for communicating corporate social responsibility.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 180-191.
  31. Skerra, C. (2023).Corporate Digital Responsibility, CDR in Marketing. In Innovatives und digitales Marketing in der Praxis: Insights, Strategien und Impulse für Unternehmen, 163-175.
  32. Tuyen, B. Q., Mai, N. P., & Long, T. Q. (2023). Does corporate engagement in social responsibility affect firm innovation? The mediating role of digital transformation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 84, 292-303.
  33. Wakefield, R. L., & Wakefield, K. (2023). The antecedents and consequences of intergroup affective polarisation on social media. Information Systems Journal. 33(4), 640-668.
  34. Wallace, E., & Buil, I. (2023). Antecedents and consequences of conspicuous green behavior on social media: Incorporating the virtual self-identity into the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Business Research, 157, 113549.
  35. Wang, J., & Sun, J. (2022). The role of audit committees in social responsibility and environmental disclosures: evidence from Chinese energy sector. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 1-16.
  36. Zhao, R. (2023, July). Research on the Importance of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Digital Economy Based on Intelligent Consumer Behavior Algorithm. In 2023 4th International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology (ECIT 2023)(pp. 108-118). Atlantis Press.
  37. Zonghua, L., Junyun, L., Yulang, G., Ming, Z., & Xu, W. (2023). The effect of corporate social responsibility on unethical pro-organizational behavior: the mediation of moral identity and moderation of supervisor-employee value congruence. Current Psychology, 42(17), 14283-14296.
  38. Abedin, Bahare, Mehdipour Pija, Sahar, Hosseinzadeh, Arezo; A true artist, Hamida. (2022). Examining the concept of digital social responsibility: examining the performance of Iranian businesses. Business Management Perspective, 21(50), 128-155. [In Persian]
  39. Saraf, Fatima; Nejati, Arash; Ruhi, Pejman. (2022). The effect of digital social responsibility on corporate social responsibility performance and strategic performance based on the mediating role of customer participation of small and medium enterprises with advanced technology, New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 6(85), 533-547[In Persian]
Statistics
Article View: 812
PDF Download: 287


login