کتاب
- زرنشان، شهرام، شکلگیری و شناسایی حقوق بینالملل عرفی (تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش، 1393).
- ضیائی بیگدلی، محمدرضا، حقوق معاهدات بینالمللی (تهران : انتشارات گنج دانش، 1385).
- فلسفی، هدایت الله، حقوق بینالملل معاهدات (تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو، 1379).
- فلسفی، هدایت الله، سیر عقل در منظومه حقوق بین الملل (تهران: نشر نو، 1396).
- کریمی، سیامک، نظام حقوقی حاکم بر اعمال یکجانبه دولتها در حقوق بینالملل (تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار، 1399).
مقالهها
- برزگرزاده، عباس، «تحولات رویکرد دو عنصری حقوق عرفی در نظریه و رویه قضایی بینالمللی»، فصلنامه تعالی حقوق، دوره جدید، شماره 20، (1396).
- حجار، محمود، سید قاسم زمانی، «جایگاه قواعد ذیربط حقوق بینالملل در تفسیر معاهدات»، مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، شماره 72، (1402).
- عابدینی، عبدالله، «اصول حاکم بر تفسیر قطعنامههای شورای امنیت»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 78، (1396).
References
Books
- Bernhardt, R, “Interpretation in International Law”, In Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume II (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1992).
- Bos, M, A Methodology of International Law (Oxford: North-Holland, 1984).
- Choi, SJ & M Gulati, “Customary International Law: How Do Courts Do It?”, in CA Bradley (ed), Custom’s Future: International Law in a Changing World (Cambridge University Press, 2016).
- De Visscher, C, Problemes d’Interpretation judiciaire en droit international public (Paris: Pedone, 1963).
- Di Marco, R, “Customary International Law: Identification Versus Interpretation”, in P Merkouris, J Kammerhofer and N Arajärvi (ed), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
- Fitzmaurice, Sir Gerald, The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, (Cambridge: Grotius, 1986).
- Fortuna, M, “Different Strings of the Same Harp: Interpretation of Rules of Customary International Law, Their Identification and Treaty Interpretation”, in P Merkouris, J Kammerhofer and N Arajärvi (ed),The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
- Garner, B. A (ed), Black’s Law Dictionary, 9th ed, (Minesota: West Group, 2009).
- Kelsen, H, General Theory of Law and State, Translated by A Wedberg (Clark, New Jersey, The Lawbook Echange, 2007).
- Kolb, R, Interprétation et Création du Droit International (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2006).
- Koskenniemi, M, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: CUP, 2005).
- Lauterpacht, Sir Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens and Sons Limited, 1958).
- Merkouris, P,“Interpreting Customary International Law: You’ll Never Walk Alone”, in P Merkouris, J Kammerhofer and N Arajärvi (ed), The Theory, Practice, and Interpretation of Customary International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2022).
- Orakhelashvili, A, The Interpretation of Acts and Rules in Public International Law (Oxford University Press, 2008).
- Procès Verbaux of the Meetings of the Advisory Committee of Jurists: 16 June – 24 July 1920 with Annexes (The Hague: Van Langenhuysen, 1920).
- Schauer, F, F “Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Customary Law”, in A. Perreau- Saussine and J.B. Murphy (eds.), The Nature of Customary Law (Cambridge, New York:Cambridge University Press, 2007).
- Sur, S, L’ Interprétation en Droit International Public (Paris: Librairie Générale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1974).
Articles
- Bleckmann, A, “Zur Feststellung und Auslegung von Völkergewohnheitsrecht”, ZaöRV, Vol. 37 (1977).
- Capotorti, F, “Cours général de droit international public”, Recueil des cours, tome 248 (1994).
- Gourgourinis, A, “The Distinction between Interpretation and Application of Norms in International Adjudication”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, Vol. 2, No. 1, (2011).
- Hart, H.L.A, “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals”, Harvard Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 4, (1958).
- Jia, BB ,“The Relations between Treaties and Custom”, Chin J Int Law, Vol. 9, No. 1, (2010).
- Kammerhofer, J, “Taking the Rules of Interpretation Seriously, but Not Literally: A Theoretical Reconstruction of the Orthodox Dogma”, Nord J Intl L, Vol. 86, Issue 2, (2017).
- Lando, M, “Might It Just Work? How To Interpret Customary International Law (Maybe)”, https:// cil. nus. edu. sg/ blogs/ might-it-just-work-how-to-interpret-customary-international-law-maybe/2023.
- Merkouris, P, “Interpreting the Customary Rules of Interpretation”, International Community Law Review,Vol 19, No. 1, (2017).
- Roberts, A, “Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation”, AJIL, Vol. 95, No. 4, (2001).
- Talmon, S, “Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion”, EJIL, Vol. 26, No. 2, (2015).
- Tassinis, O C, “Customary International Law: Interpretation from Beginning to End”, EJIL, Vol. 31, No. 1, (2020).
- Treves, T, “Customary International Law”, Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, para. 2, accessible at mpepil.com (Last Accessed on 25 July 2024).
Documents
- Covenant of the League of Nations, 1919.
- Draft Conclusions on Identification of Customary International Law, ILC Report, 2018, UN Doc. A/73/10.
- Draft Conclusions on Subsequent Agreements and Subsequent Practice in Relation to Treaty Interpretation”, 2018, UN Doc. A/73/10.
- Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law: Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, 2006, UN Doc. A/CN.4/L.682.
- Guiding Principles Applicable to Unilateral Declarations of States Capable of Creating Legal Obligations, 2006, UN Doc A/61/10.
- ILA, Final Report of the Committee: Statement of Principles Applicable to the Formation of General Customary International Law, in ILA, Report of the 69th Conference (2000).
- PCIJ Statute, 1920.
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 1998.
- United Nations, Documents of the United Nations Conference on International Organization (UNCIO), San Francisco, 1945, Vol. XIII (London: United Nations Information Organizations, 1945-55).
Cases
- Alex Genin, Eastern Credit Limited, Inc. and A.S. Baltoil Genin v. Republic of Estonia, Award of 25 June (2001), ICSID ARB/99/2.
- Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgement, ICJ Reports, (2007).
- Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya v Malta) (Judgment) , ICJ Reports, (1985).
- Case Concerning the Continental Shelf (Tunisia v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) (Judgment), ICJ Reports, (1982).
- Corfu Channel(United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania), Judgment, ICJ Reports, 1949.
- Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada v. United States of America) (Judgment), ICJ Reports,1984.
- Fisheries case (United Kingdom v. Norway) (Judgment), ICJ Reports, (1951).
- Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso v. Republic of Mali), Judgment, ICJ Reports, (1986).
- Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy) (Judgment), ICJ Reports, (2012).
- Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, (2019).
- Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, (1996).
- Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America), ICJ Reports, (1984).
- Mondev International Ltd. V. United States of America, Award of 11 October 2002, ICSID ARB(AF)/99/2.
- North Sea Continental Shelf cases (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v Netherlands), ICJ Reports, (1969).
- Nuclear Tests (Australia v France) (Judgment) ICJ Reports, 1974.
- Prosecutor v Duško Tadić (Appeal Judgment) IT-94–1-A, 1999.
- Prosecutor v Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (Pre-Trial Chamber III, Fourth Decision on Victims’ Participation), ICC-01/05–01/08–320 (12 December 2006).
- Reparation of Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, 1949.
- SS Lotus (France v Turkey) (Judgment) [1927] PCIJ Series A 10, 28; Asylum Case (Colombia v Peru) (Counter-claims), ICJ Reports, 1950.
- The Mavrommatis Jerusalem Concessions (Greece v the United Kingdom) PCIJ, Ser A, No 5, 1925.
Sites
|
