نقش نظام حقوقی علامت تجاری در حمایت از شخصیت‌‌های خیالی با تأکید بر حقوق ایالات متحد آمریکا

• جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفـر، ترمینولوژی حقوق، چـاپ هفتم، (تهـران: انتشـارات گـنج دانـش، ۱۳۷۴).
• لجم‌اورک، حسن. اصول حاکم بر نظام علامت تجاری،(تهران: نشر میزان، 1401).

• حبیبا، سعید؛ حسین‌زاده، مجید، «تحلیل دکترین رقیق‌سازی (دکترین نقض نوع دوم) در نظام حقوقی حاکم بر علائم تجاری». فصلنامۀ مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ ۴۳، شمارۀ (۱)، ۱۳۹۲، صص 17-35. doi:10.22059/jlq.2013.35278
• حکمت‌نیا، محمود؛ خوشنویس، امرالله، «مصادیق حقوق مالکیت فکری در صنعت ورزش». فصلنامۀ حقوق اسلامی، دورۀ 6، شمارۀ23، ۱۳۸۸، صص 127-158.
• شاکری، زهرا؛ نورعلی، سهیلا، «نهاد لباس تجاری؛ نگاهی دوباره به نظام علائم تجاری». حقوق تطبیقی (نامه مفید)، دورۀ 14شمارۀ 2 (پیاپی 110) )، 1397، صص 97-120. doi:10.22096/law.2019.34500
• صالحی مازندرانی، محمد؛ محمدی، عمید،.«حمایت حقوقی از شخصیت‌های خیالی (کاراکترها) در امریکا؛ رهاوردی برای حقوق ایران»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی،12(1)، 1400 doi: 22059/jcl.2020.300374.633987
• فصیحی‌زاده، علیرضا؛ مومنی تذرجی، احسان؛ و باقرپور، محمد، «بررسی تطبیقی شروط ماهوی علائم تجاری با تاکید بر علائم رنگی و سه بعد». مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، سال 1395، دورۀ 7 شمارۀ 2، 627-646.doi: 10.22059/jcl.2016.60696
• قبولی، درافشان؛ بختیاروند، محمدهادی؛ خوانساری، مصطفی؛ خوانساری، سمانه، «حق شهرت مطالعه در حقوق آمریکا: کوشش برای شناسایی در فقه امامیه و ساماندهی آن در حقوق ایران». مطالعات حقوق خصوصی، دورۀ ۴۸ شمارۀ ۱، سال ۱۳۹۷، صص 133-151. doi:10.22059/jlq.2018.232851

In persia

Books:

- Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar. (1995). Terminology of Law, (7th ed.). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publications. Entry No. 2706.

- Lejam Ourak, Hassan. (2022). Fundamental Principles Governing the Trademark System. Tehran: Mizan Publishing.

Articles:

- Salehi Mazandarani, Mohammad, & Mohammadi, Amid. “Legal Protection of Fictional Characters in the U.S.: A Contribution to Iranian Law.” Comparative Legal Studies, 12(1). (2021).doi:10.22059/jcl.2020.300374.633987

- Shakeri, Zahra, & Nourali, Sohila.“The Institution of Trade Dress: A Reappraisal of the Trademark System.” Comparative Law Journal (Nameh Mofid), Vol. 14, No. 2 (Issue 110), 2018. doi: 10.22096/law.2019.34500

  - Habiba, Saeed, & Hosseinzadeh, Majid. “An Analysis of the Dilution Doctrine (The  Second Type of Infringement) in the Legal System Governing Trademarks.” Quarterly Journal of Private Law Studies, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2013. doi: 10.22059/jlq.2013.35278

 - Hekmatnia, Mahmoud, & Khoshnevis, Amrollah. “Examples of Intellectual Property Rights in the Sports Industry.” Islamic Law Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 23, 2010.

- Ghobouli Darafshan, Bakhtiarvand, Mohammad-Hadi, Khansari, Mostafa, & Khansari, Samaneh. “The Right of Publicity: A Study in U.S. Law with an Effort to Identify It in Shi’a Jurisprudence and Regulate It in Iranian Law.” Private Law Studies, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2018. doi: 10.22059/jlq.2018.232851

- Fasihee Zadeh, Alireza, Momeni Tazraji, Ehsan, & Bagherpour, Mohammad. “A Comparative Study of the Substantive Requirements of Trademarks with Emphasis on Color and Three-Dimensional Marks.” Comparative Legal Studies, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2016. doi: 10.22059/jcl.2016.60696

 لاتین

Books:

• Anthony, F. (1989). Lo Cicero, Litigating Trademark Cases, in Practising Law Institute, Litigating Copyright, Trademark, And Unfair Competition Cases 1989, Practising Law Institute.
• Black C, Henry, Black's. (2014). Right of Publicity. Law Dictionary, 10th ed. (West Group), Bryan A. Garner, editor.
• Millot, V. (2009), Trademarks as an Indicator of Product and Marketing Innovations, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2009/06, Paris:OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/224428874418.
• Neufeldt, V. Guralnik, D. (1988). unfair competition. In Webster’s New World Dictionary (3rd College edition, p 1457). Simon & Schuster, Inc.

Articles:

• Allen M. J. (1994). “The Role of Actual Confusion Evidence in Federal Trademark Infringement Litigation”, 16 Campbell L. Rev. 19-42.
• Byron, T. M. (2010). “Of Dancers, Black Panthers, Cheerleaders, and Icons: Reflections of the Idea/Expression Dichotomy in the Relevance Prong of the Rogers Test”. Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property, 13, 1-36.
• Calboli, I. (2014). “Overlapping trademark and copyright protection: A call for concern and action”. Ill. L. Rev. Online, 25-34.
• Gard, E. T. (2018). “Last Twenty (L20) Collections: Applying Copyright's Section 108 (h) in Libraries, Archives and Museums including the New Music Modernization Act for Pre-1972 Sound Recordings”. UCLA JL & Tech., 22, i.1-103.
• Hartford W. C, Lisa E. Socransky, Cynthia B. Glasser, and Martha M. (1989). “Early, Developments in the Law: Title Protection”, 10 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 470-552.
• Kennedy, A. E. (2006). “From Delusion To Dilution: Proposals To Improve Problematic Aspects Of The Federal Trademark Dilution Act. NYU Journal Of Legislation And Public Policy”, 9_.
• King, Sandra. (1998). “Can passing off in new zealand expand to accomodate protection for personal images”. Auckland University Law Review, 8(3), 858-882.
• Knudsen, (2000). “Tomorrow Never Dies: The Protection of Fictional Characters Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act”,Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 2(1) .13-28.
• Kurtz, L. A. (1986). "The Independent Legal Lives of Fictional Characters". L. Rev., 429. 429-522.
• Nickles, C. (1999). “The Conflicts Between Intellectual Property Protections when a Character Enters the Public Domain”. UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 7(1). 134-168. doi:5070/LR871026993
• O'Connor, M. (2010). “It's a Little-Known Fact That Copyright Law is in Conflict with the Right of Publicity”. Touro L. Rev., 26, 351-392.
• Peaslee, S. S. (2014). “Is there a place for us: Protecting fan fiction in the United States and Japan”. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y, 43, 199-227.
• Schapiro, J. L. (1987). “Trademark infringement: Pursuing colorable claims may result in paying king size damages”. Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review, 7(1), 177-189.
• Schreyer, A. (2015). “An Overview of Legal Protection for Fictional Characters: Balancing Public and Private Interests”. Cybaris: Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 3, 52-92.
• Walker, S. (2021). “The Blur Between Fact and Fiction: Should Trademark Protections Extend to Aspects of Fictional Works?” 20 uic rev. Prop. L. 451-470.

Master thesis:

• Kunert, S. (2011). “Marks of Consequence–An Irrational Basis of Trademark Protection, or: Re-Inculcating some Schechter into the Doctrine of Trademark Dilution”, Master's thesis of Law, University of Canterbury,1-200.
• Metsola, A. (2016). “So, Tarzan, Zorro, and Mickey Mouse went to a bar: Trademark protection of public domain characters” (Master's thesis, Hanken School of Economics).
• Tang Wei. (2017). “Trademark Issues in Entertainment Industry” (Doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University Graduate School). P 56.