| تعداد نشریات | 61 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,226 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,190 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,988,565 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 29,030,807 |
اثرات پیمان های راهبردی بر روابط بین یادگیری سازمانی، نوآوری و عملکرد مالی شرکت | ||
| مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 21، شماره 64، شهریور 1390، صفحه 141-166 اصل مقاله (3.69 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| بهمن حاجی پور1؛ مرتضی کرد* 2 | ||
| 1استادیار مدیریت دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد مدیریت بازرگانی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز | ||
| چکیده | ||
| دستیابی به عملکرد مالی برتر یکی از موضوعات مورد علاقه شرکت ها و محققان رشته مدیریت است. هدف از این تحقیق بررسی اثرات یادگیری سازمانی و نوآوری بر عملکرد مالی شرکتهاست. و این که "آیا این اثرات به دلیل ارتباط شرکت با هم پیمانان بهبود پیدا میکند؟" الگوی تحقیق روی 501 نمونه از شرکتهایی که دارای پیمان راهبردی بودهاند با استفاده از الگویابی معادله مورد آزمون قرار )PLS( ساختاری و بر اساس روششناسی کمترین مربعات بخشی گرفت. تحلیلها نشان داد که یادگیری سازمانی و نوآوری بر عملکرد مالی شرکت ها اثر مستقیم دارد. ضمن این که مشخص شد یکی از منابع خارجی قابل اتکا برای یادگیری و نوآوری خارجی شرکت ها پیمان راهبردی است. به طوری که تشکیل پیمان های راهبردی باعث بهبود روابط بین یادگیری سازمانی، نوآوری و عملکرد مالی می شود. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| یادگیری سازمانی؛ نوآوری؛ پیمان های راهبردی؛ عملکرد | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
بازرگان، عباس و زهره سرمد و الهه حجازی 5121 ، روشهای تحقیق در علوم رفتاری، چاپ پانزدهم، نشرآگاه،. 2. Abernathy, W.J., Clark, K.B., 1985. Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Research Policy 14, 3–22. 3. Alegre, J, & Chiva, R, (2008), Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test, Technovation 28: 315–326 4. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. 5. Argote, L., McEvily, B., Reagans, R., 2003. Managing knowledge in organizations: an integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science 49 (4), 571–582 6. Bapuji, Hari. (2004). From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research. Management Learning 2004; 35; 397 7. Capon, N., Farley, J.U., Lehman, D.R., Hulbert, J.M., 1992. Profiles of product innovators among large US manufacturers. Management Science 38 (2), 157–169. 8. Choua, Shih-Wei., Chen, Pi-Yu. (2009), The influence of individual differences on continuance intentions of enterprise resource planning (ERP), Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 67. pp. 484-496. 9. Dearborn, R., and Herbert A.Simon1958 "Selective perception in executives." Sociometry, 21 :140- 144. 10. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–136. 11. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34,555– 590. 12. Das. Somnath.(1998). Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 41, Iss. 1 13. Deeds, D.L. and Hill, C.W.L. (1996) Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: an empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing 11, 41–55. 14. Eisenhardt, K., & Schoonhoven, C. B. 1996. Strategic alliance formation in entrepreneurial firms: Strategic needs and social opportunities for cooperation. Organization Science, 7: 136–150. 15. Huber, G. (1991) ‘Organisational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures’, Organisation Science 2(1): 88–115. 16. Gulati, R., 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1), 85–112. 17. Glynn, M.A., 1996. Innovative genius: a framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review 21, 1081–1111. 18. Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116. 19. Khanna, T., Gulati, R., & Nohria, N. (1998). The dynamics of learning alliances: Competition, cooperation, and relative scope. Strategic Management Journal, 19(3): 193–210. 20. Hensler, J.Chiristian. M. R, Rudolf. R.s (2009). The Use OF Partial Least Squares Path Modeling In International Marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing, Volume 20, 277–319 21. Inkpen, Andrew C. 1998. “Learning, Knowledge Acquisition, and Strategic Alliances.” European Management Journal 16(2): 223-229. 22. Iyer, Karthik N.S.(2002). Learning in Strategic Alliances: An Evolutionary Perspective. Academy of Marketing Science Review. Volume 2002 No. 10 23. Lemon, M., Sahota, P.S., 2004. Organizational culture as a knowledge repository for increased innovative capacity. Technovation 24 (6), 483–499. 24. Levitt, B. and March, J. G. (1988) ‘Organisational Learning’, American Review of Sociology 14: 319–40. 25. Liao, S, Fei, Wu-Chen, Liu, C, (2008), Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation, Technovation 28: 183–195 26. Freeman, C., Soete, L., 2000. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Continuum, London. 27. Jiang, X, Li, Y. (2008). The relationship between organizational learning and firm s’ financial performance in strategic alliances: A contingency approach. Journal of Word Business, 43: 365-379 28. Mansfield, E., 1968. The Economics of Technological Change. Norton, New York. 29. March, J., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71–87. 30. McKelvey, B., 1982. Organizational Systematics. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA. 31. Myers, S., Marquis, D.G., 1969. Successful Industrial Innovations. National Science Foundation, Washington. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963. A Behavioural Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 32. Robinson, W. T. 1988. Sources of market pioneer advantages: The case of industrial goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research, 25: 87-94. 33. Rodriguez-Pinto, Javier, Rodriguez -Escudero Gutiérrez-Cillán Ana Isabel Jesús. (2008). Order, positioning, scope and outcomes of market entry. Industrial marketing management, 37, 154-166. 34. Sa´nchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 63–76. 35. Schwandt, D. R. (1997) ‘Integrating Strategy and Organisational Learning’, in P. Shrivastava, A. S. Huff and J. E. Dutton (series eds) and J. P. Walsh and A. S. Huff (vol. eds) Advances in Strategic Management, Vol. 14, Organisational Learning and Strategic Management, pp. 337–59, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 36. Senge, Peter (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization 37. Slater SF, Narver JC. Market orientation and learning orientation. Journal of Marketing 1995;59(3):63–74. 38. Sosik John J., Kahai Surinder S. and Piovoso Michael J. (2009). Silver Bullet or Voodoo Statistics? A Primer for Using the Partial Least Squares Data Analytic Technique in Group and Organization Research. Group Organization Management, 34[5]. 39. Stevens, G., Burley, J., Divine, R., 1999. Creativity plus business discipline equals higher profits faster from new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 (5), 455–468. 40. Tushman, M.L., Nadler, D.A., 1986. Organizing for innovation. California Management Review 28, 74–92. 41. Wheelwright, S.C., Clark, K.B., 1992. Revolutionizing Product Development-Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency, and Quality. The Free Press, New York. 42. Williams, A. P. (2001) ‘A Belief-focused Process Model of Organisational Learning’, The Journal of Management Studies 38(1): 67–85. 43. Woodman RW, Sawyer JE, Griffin RW.(1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review; 18 (2): 293 –321. 44. Wu, Wei Wen. (2010), Linking Bayesian networks and PLS path modeling for causal analysis, Expert Systems with Applications, 37. pp.134-139. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,333 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,522 |
||