تحلیل کنش‌های ارتباطی و مدیریت تأثیر در گروه‌های تلگرام

-         عبداللهیان، حمید. اجاق، سیده زهرا (1385). بومی کردن نظریه کنش ارتباطی برای تحلیل فرایند توسعه و مدرنیته در ایران، مجله جهانی رسانه، دوره 1. شماره 1.

-         عقیلی، سید وحید. پوری، احسان (1390، پاییز). تأثیر شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی بر ارتباطات بین فردی کاربران، فصلنامه فرهنگ ارتباطات.

-         مهدوی، محمدصادق و مبارکی، محمد. (1385). تحلیل نظریه کنش ارتباطی هابرماس، فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی علوم اجتماعی، سال دوم، شماره هشتم.

وایت، استیون. (1380). نوشته‌های اخیر هابرماس؛ خرد، عدالت و نوگرایی، ترجمه: محمد حریری اکبری، تهران: انتشارات قطره، ص 72.

-         هابرماس، یورگن (۱۳۸۴). نظریه کنش ارتباطی، جلدهای 1 و 2. ترجمه: کمال پولادی. تهران: انتشارات موسسه ایران.

-          Arkin, R.M (1981).Self-presentation styles. In J T. Tedeschi (Ed), Impression theory and social psychological research (pp/311-333).

-          Bazarova, N. N., & Walther, J. B. (2009). Attributions in virtual groups: Distances and behavioral invariations computer-mediated discussions. Small Group Research, 40, 138-162.

-          Bolton, Roger. (2005). Habermars’s theory of communicative action and theory of social capital. Department of Economics and Center for Enviromental Studies Williams College.

-          Gasiorek, J., Giles, H, Holtgraves, T., & Robbins, S. (2012). Celebrating thirty years of the JLSP: Analyses and prospects. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. Doi:10.1177/0261927X12446614

-          Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2014). Communication accommodation theory: A situated framework for interpersonal, family, and intergroup dynamics. In D. Braithewaite & P. Schrodt (Eds.), Engaging interpersonal theories (2nd ed., pp. 159-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

-          Goffman, E (1959), the presentation of Self in Everyday life. University of Edinburgg, Social Sciences Research Center. Retrieved from www, monoscop.org.

-          Goffman, E. (1967). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

-          Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., &Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37, 3-19. Feb.

-          Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action – Reason and the Rationalisation of Society(Vol I), Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

-          http://www.financialtribune.com/archive/2016/02/07/articles/sci-tech/39700/Top 10 Android Apps in Iran.

-          Leshed, G., Hancock, J. H., Cosley, D., McLeod, P. L., and Gay, G. (2007). Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices. Proceedings of Group ‘07, Sanibel Island, Florida, November 04 -07, 2007, 217-220.

-          Nemeth, C. (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition, 13, 273-291.

-          Ojagh, Seyedeh Zahra. (2016).forming self: smart phones in contemporary Iran, UCLA conference.

-          Swingewood, Alan. (1998). Cultural The oryandThe Problem of Modernity, Palgrave MacMilan

-          Tausczik, T. (2013). Changing group dynamics through computerized language feedback (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Texas, Austin.

-          Turner, Jonathan H. (1998). The Structure of Sociological Theory. Sixth Edition, Wadsworth publcation company The US.

-          Walther, J. B., Bunz, U., &Bazarova, N. (2005). The rules of virtual groups. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Washington, DC: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

-          Wang, Z., Walther, J. B., & Hancock, J. (2009). Social identification and interpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication: What you do versus who you are in virtual groups. Human Communication Research, 35, 59-85.

-          www.theguardian.com/world/2016/feb/08/Telegram: the instant messaging app freeingup Iranians’ conversations.

-          Yilmaz, G. & Peña, J. (2014). The influence of social categories and interpersonal behaviors on future intentions and attitudes to form subgroups in virtual teams. Communication Research, 41, 333-352.

-           Yilmaz, G. & Peña, J. (2015). How Do Interpersonal Behaviors and Social Categories Affect Language Use?: The Case of Virtual Teams, Communication Quarterly, Vol. 63, No. 4, September–October 2015, pp. 427–443.

-          Yilmaz, G. (2016). What You Do and How You Speak Matter: Behavioral and Linguistic Determinants of Performance in Virtual Teams, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 35(1) 76–97, DOI: 10.1177/0261927X15575772