کنش افتراقی سؤال‌ در آزمون های سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور بر حسب ویژگیهای جمعیت شناختی داوطلبان کنکور سراسری

ایزانلو، ب.، و حبیبی، م.(۱۳۸۹). شناسایی کارکرد متفاوت سؤال بر اساس نظریه سؤال-پاسخ: کاربرد الگوی تک پارامتری با استفاده از نرم‌افزار بای لوگ-ام جی. فصلنامه روان‌شناسی کاربردی، (2) ۴، ۳۱ -۲۰.

خدایی، ابراهیم، (1388) الف. بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر قبولی در آزمون کارشناسی ارشد. فصلنامه پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی در آموزش عالی، (54)، 34-19.

خدایی، ابراهیم (1388) ب. بررسی رابطه سرمایه اقتصادی و فرهنگی والدین دانش آموزان با احتمال قبولی آن‌ها در آزمون سراسری سال تحصیلی 1385. فصلنامه انجمن آموزش عالی ایران، (1)4، 84-65.

گرامی پور، مسعود (1393). ارزیابی توان آماری تحلیل رگرسیون لجستیک در آشکارسازی کنش افتراقی سؤال‌های آزمون. فصلنامه مطالعات اندازه‌گیری و ارزشیابی آموزشی، 4(8)، 211-187.

نوربخش، سید مرتضی (1389). نقش سرمایه‌های فرهنگی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی خانواده در موفقیت داوطلبان آزمون سراسری. فصلنامه برنامه‌ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، 4،135-94.

همبلتون، رونالد ک؛ سؤامیناتان، اچ؛ راجرز، اچ. جین (1991). مبانی نظریه پرسش- پاسخ. ترجمه محمدرضا فلسفی‌نژاد (1389). تهران: دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی.

Abedalaziz, N. (2010). A gender-related differential item functioning of mathematics test items. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5, 101- 116.

Amirian, S. M. R., Alavi, S. M., & Fidalgo, A. M. (2014). Detecting Gender DIF with an English Proficiency Test in EFL Context. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(2).

Barati, H., & Ahmadi, A. R. (2010). Gender-based DIF across the Subject Area: A Study of the Iranian National University Entrance Exam. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(3), 1-26.

Barnes, B. J., & Wells, C. S. (2009). Differential item functional analysis by gender and race of the national doctoral program survey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 4, 77-96.

Broer, M. (2005). Ensuring the fairness of GRE writing prompts: Assessing differential difficulty. ETS Research Report Series, 2005(1), i-41.

Byrne, B. M., & Stewart, S. M. (2006). The MACS approach to testing for multigroup invariance of a second-order structure: A walk through the process. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 287-321.

Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cole, N.S., Zieky, M.J. (2001). The New Faces of Fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38, no. 4: 369-382.

Dinis da Costa, P., & Araújo., L. (2012). Differential Item Functioning (DIF): What Functions Differently for Immigrant Students in PISA 2009 Reading Items?. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, Report EUR 25565 EN.

Gomez-Benito, J., & Navas-Ara, M. J. (2000). A comparison of χ2, RFA and IRT based procedures in the detection of DIF. Quality and Quantity, 34(1), 17–31.

Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item Response Theory: Principles and Applications. Kluwer–Nijhoff, Boston.

Harding, L. (2012). Accent, listening assessment and the potential for a shared-L1 advantage: A DIF perspective. Language Testing, 29(2), 163–180. DOI:10.1177/0265532211421161

Le, V. N. (1999). Identifying Differential Item Functioning on the NELS: 88 History Achievement Test. Center for the Study of Evaluation, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, Graduate School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.

Lewis, Anne (April 2000). High-stakes testing: Trends and issues. Mid Continent Research for Education and Learning.

Mazor, K. M., Hambleton, R. K., & Clauser, B. E. (1998). Multidimensional DIF analyses: The effects of matching on unidimensional subtest scores. Applied Psychological Measurement. Vol 22(4), 357.367.

Doudeen, H., & Annabi, H. (2008). Sex-Related Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analysis of TIMSS. Educational Sciences, 35, p697.

Millsap, R.E (2011). Statistical Approaches to Measurement Invariance. New York:NY, Routledge

Ogretmen, T. (2015). DIF analysis across genders for reading comprehension part of English language achievement exam as a foreign language. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(11), 1505-1513.

Owen, K. (1992b). Test-item bias: Methods, findings and recommendations. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.

Popham,W.J. (2005). HIGH-STAKES TESTS: HARMFUL, PERMANENT, FIXABLE, American Educational Research Journal.6,p85.

Rezaee, A., & Shabani, E. (2009). Gender Differential Item Functioning Analysis of the University of Tehran English Proficiency Test. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji,56,89-108.

Rezaee, A., & Shabani, E. (2010). Gender differential item functioning analysis of the University of Tehran English Proficiency Test. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, 56, 89, 108.

Shanmugam, S. K. S., & Lan, O. S. (2014). THE VALIDITY OF ADMINISTERING BILINGUAL MATHEMATICS TEST AMONG MALAYSIAN BILINGUAL STUDENTS USING DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING (DIF). Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 29, 1-18.

Shuttleworth-Jordan, A.B. (1996). On not reinventing the wheel: A clinical perspective on culturally relevant test usage in South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology, 26 (2), 96- 102.

Shealy, R.T., Stout, W.F. (1993). A model based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIF. Psychometrika 58, 197–239.

Song, X., Cheng, L., & Klinger, D. DIF investigations across groups of gender and academic background in a large-scale high-stakes language test. Language Testing and Assessment 4, 1, p97.

Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J. (1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361– 370.

Takala, S., & Kaftandjieva, F. (2000). Test fairness: A DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test. Language Testing, 17(3), 323-340.

Vanderberg, R. J. (2002). Toward a further understanding of and improvement in measurement invariance methods and procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 139–158.

Van de Vijver, F. & Poortinga, Y.H. (1997). Towards an integrated analysis of bias in cross-cultural assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 13 (1), 29-37.

Van Zyl, E. & Visser, D. (1998). Differential item functioning in the figure classification test. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 24 (2), 25-33.

Young, J. W., Morgan, R., Rybinski, P., Steinberg, J., & Wang, Y. (2013). Assessing the Test Information Function and Differential Item Functioning for the TOEFL Junior® Standard Test. ETS Research Report Series, 2013(1), i-27

Zumbo, B. D. and Thomas, D. R. (1997). A measure of effect size for a model-based approachfor studying DIF. Prince George, Canada: University of Northern British Columbia, Edgeworth Laboratory for Quantitative Behavioral Science.