مطالعه تطبیقی عناصر نقض علامت تجاری در حقوق آمریکا و ایران

بادینی، حسن، مجید حسین‌زاده، سمانه محبی فرد،  «بررسی نظریه استفاده منصفانه قانونی (کلاسیک) در علائم تجاری توصیفی»، پژوهشنامه بازرگانی، شماره 73، ( 1393 ).

صفایی، سید ‌حسین و حبیب‌لله رحیمی، مسئولیت مدنی،( تهران: سمت، 1389)

قاسم‌زاده، مرتضی، مبانی مسئولیت مدنی،( تهران، میزان، 1387)

کاتوزیان، ناصر، مسئولیت مدنی،( تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 1390)

 

English Sources

Yen Alfred C.,( 2015) "Intent and Trademark Infringement" , Arizona Law Review ,VOL. 57:715.

Bartow Ann, (2004), "Likelihood of Confusion", School of Law - University of San Diego, San Diego Law Review, , Vol. 41: 721.

Beebe Barton( 2006), "An Empirical Study of the Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement" ,California Law Review, Volume 94 , Issue 6,.

Danish patent and trademark office, (2010), Workshop on the Revision of Trademark Law, Diqing (Yunnan Province), P.R. China.

Dr B.L Wadhera, Law Relating To Intellectual Property- Patents, Trade Marks, Copyrights, Designs, Geographical Indications, Semiconductor Integr, (Universal Law Publishing ,5^th Edition, 2016).

Palmer Edwards Wildman LLP, "No registration, no problem", World Trademark Review, December/January 2013.

Kenneth R. Thomas, Tatelman, Todd B, "The Power to Regulate Commerce: Limits on Congressional Power", Washington D.C., Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service., 2014.

Blum Kevin, Ariel Fox, Christina J. Hayes, and James (Hanjun) Xu., (2010),"Consistency of Confusion? A Fifteen-Year Revisiting of Barton Beebe’s Empirical Analysis of Multifactor Tests for Trademark Infringement", Harvard Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series Paper No. 09-32,.

Young Jay -June Yang,?(2008)," How to Protect A Trademark In Korea", European Communities Trade Mark Association 27th Annual Meeting in Killarney.

Lemley Mark A. and  Mark McKenna, (2010), "Irrelevant Confusion", Stanford Law Review [Vol. 62:413,.

Lemley Mark A., (1999), "The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense", 108 YALE L.J. 1687, 1688

Partridge Mark V.B., "Likelihood of Confusion: Understanding Trademark Law’s Key Principle", Pattishall, McAuliffe, Newbury, Hilliard & Geraldson LLP.Available at: https://www.pattishall.com/pdf/LikelihoodofConfusion.pdf.

Kaeding Patricia J., (1992), "Clearly Erroneous Review of Mixed Questions of Law and Fact: The Likelihood of Confusion Determination in Trademark Law", The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 59 : Iss. 3,.

Marquez Patricia, (2011), "Trademark: A Comparative Look at China and the United States, Touro", International Law Review, Volume 14, No. 2.

Brown Ralph S. Jr,(1948), "Advertising and the Public Interest: Legal Protection of Trade Symbols", , Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship,The Yale Law Journal, VOL 57.

Tushnet Rebecca, (2011)," Running the gamut from A to B: Federal Trademark and False Advertising Law", University of Pennsylvania Law Review ,Vol. 159,.

Callmann Rudolf, (1949), "Trade-Mark Infringement and Unfair Competition", 14 Law and Contemporary Problems ,.

Dogan Stacey L. & Mark A Lemley, (2005), "The Merchandising Right: Fragile Theory or Fait Accompli?", 54 Emory L.J. 461, 467 ,.

Stephanie M. Greene, (2008), "Protecting Well-Known Marks in China: Challenges for Foreign Mark Holders",American. Business Journal, Vol.45 ,.

Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed ( us :Clark Boardman Callaghan, 2007).

Landes William M. & Richard A. Posner, The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law (Harvard Univ. Press, 2003).

 

 ج) آراء استنادی

Bd. of Regents, Univ. of (Tex. ex rel. Univ. of Tex. at Austin v. KST Elec. Ltd., 550 F. Supp. 2d 657, 672 (W.D. Tex. 2008).

Belmora LLC v. Bayer Consumer Care AG, No. 15-1335)).

Champions Golf Club, Inc. v. Champions Golf Club, Inc., 78 F.3d 1111, 1121 (6th Cir. 1996).

Hanover Star Milling Co v Metcalf, 240 US 403, 415 (1916); see also United Drug Co v Theodore Rectanus Co, 248 US 90, 97 (1918).

Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers Inc., 295 F.Supp. 479, 488 (S.D.N.Y.1968).

ed 2010).

Platinum Home Mortgage Corp. v. Platinum Financial Group, Inc., 149 F.3d 722, 47 U.S.P.Q.2d1587 (7th Cir. 1998).

Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc. 562 F.3d 123 (2nd Cir. 2009).

Taubman Company v. Webfeats, et al. 319 F.3d 770 (6th Cir., February 7, 2003).

United States v. 88 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bireley‘s Orange Beverage, 187 F.2d 967, 971 (3d Cir. 1951(