دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات60
تعداد شماره‌ها2,022
تعداد مقالات16,253
تعداد مشاهده مقاله42,491,966
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله24,319,915
Khalili, Leila, Wijayasundara, Nayana Darshani. (1400). Analyzing Social Engineering Research through Co-authorship Networks Using Scopus Database during 1926-2020. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 3(4), 7-38. doi: 10.22054/dcm.2022.14016
Leila Khalili; Nayana Darshani Wijayasundara. "Analyzing Social Engineering Research through Co-authorship Networks Using Scopus Database during 1926-2020". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 3, 4, 1400, 7-38. doi: 10.22054/dcm.2022.14016
Khalili, Leila, Wijayasundara, Nayana Darshani. (1400). 'Analyzing Social Engineering Research through Co-authorship Networks Using Scopus Database during 1926-2020', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 3(4), pp. 7-38. doi: 10.22054/dcm.2022.14016
Khalili, Leila, Wijayasundara, Nayana Darshani. Analyzing Social Engineering Research through Co-authorship Networks Using Scopus Database during 1926-2020. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1400; 3(4): 7-38. doi: 10.22054/dcm.2022.14016

Analyzing Social Engineering Research through Co-authorship Networks Using Scopus Database during 1926-2020

International Journal of Digital Content Management
دوره 3، شماره 4، فروردین 2022، صفحه 7-38    اصل مقاله (986.54 K)
نوع مقاله: Original Article
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/dcm.2022.14016
نویسندگان
Leila Khalili* 1؛ Nayana Darshani Wijayasundara2
1Azarbaijan Shahid Madani University
2University of Sri Jayewardenepura,Nugegoda, Sri Lanka
چکیده
Purpose: Hacking the human brain and manipulating human trust to obtain information and get monetary gains is called social engineering. This study aims to visualize and analyze the co-authorship networks in the Scopus citation database's social engineering research from 1926 to 2020. 
Method: The present quantitative study used the bibliometric method and social network analysis. The study collected data from the Scopus database. A total number of 1994 records were taken as the sample of the study. Researchers used descriptive and inferential statistics and social network analysis to obtain results; to do this, different software types were used in the study (SPSS, Microsoft Excel, Text Statistics Analyzer, ISI.exe, Pajek, and VOSviewer). Findings: The findings indicate the top three sources of publishing and the related subject areas. Furthermore, the top three core authors and countries were identified. Also, the authors with high centrality measures in the co-authorship networks were identified. A large majority of papers had only one author. The Collaborative Coefficient among researchers was 0.36. Based on the results of Spearman's test, there was a significant association between the number of documents, the number of citations, and the rate of total link strength of the countries. Likewise, there was a positive and high significant association between degree and closeness centralities. 
Conclusion: The researchers' frequently used keywords in this area were social engineering, phishing, and information security; in addition, the frequency of keywords was not compatible with Zipf’s Law. A small sample of keywords will not properly follow Zipf’s distribution.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Bibliometric؛ Co-authorship Networks؛ Centrality Measures؛ Social Engineering؛ Zipf’s Law
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 372
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 337


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب
login