A Comparative Analysis of Qur’anic Verses on Steadfastness with Emphasis on al-Mīzān and Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān | ||
| پژوهشنامه معارف قرآنی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 17، شماره 65، 1405 اصل مقاله (1.12 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/rjqk.2026.92438.3289 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Ali Farsimadan* 1؛ Hamid Ghorbani2 | ||
| 1Department of Law and Comparative Jurisprudence, Faculty of Islamic Denominations, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran. | ||
| 2PhD Student in Quranic Sciences and Hadith Studies, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| two contemporary Qur’anic exegeses, al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān by Allamah Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn Ṭabāṭabāʾī and Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān by Sayyid Quṭb, with particular emphasis on the role of textual context in uncovering the implications of the relevant verses. The central question is what foundations and functions the two exegetes delineate for steadfastness, despite their shared understanding of it as a necessary corollary of faith and guidance. Employing a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach, this study examines their exegetical views concerning the verses on steadfastness, particularly verse 30 of Surah al-Fuṣṣilat. The findings indicate that, relying on the Qurʾān by the Qurʾān method of exegesis and the contextual links of the verse, Allamah Ṭabāṭabāʾī regards steadfastness as steadfastness in monotheistic faith and enduring commitment to the requirements of servitude to God and His Lordship. In this reading, the sequence, "Our Lord is Allah; then they remained steadfast," signifies the precedence of monotheistic affirmation and the grounding of practical steadfastness in it. The glad tidings of the angels likewise elucidate the reassuring consequences of this firmness in faith. In contrast, through an educational, social, and action-oriented approach, Sayyid Quṭb interprets steadfastness not only as doctrinal steadfastness but also as persistent perseverance along the path of invitation, endurance of hardships, and resistance to the obstacles hindering the realization of a monotheistic way of life. The study concludes that Ṭabāṭabāʾī’s exegesis focuses more strongly on the epistemic foundations and intra-textual implications of steadfastness, whereas Sayyid Quṭb highlights the educational, social, and activist capacities of this concept. Thus, the two exegeses concur on the fundamental connection between steadfastness, monotheism, and guidance, while differing in its scope and mode of application. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Steadfastness؛ Comparative Exegesis؛ Allamah Ṭabāṭabāʾī؛ Tafsīr al-Mīzān؛ Fī Ẓilāl al-Qurʾān. | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 95 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 106 |
||