| تعداد نشریات | 60 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,039 |
| تعداد مقالات | 16,469 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 43,649,338 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 24,820,726 |
A dynamical system model-driven approach to pricing with smart volatility: a case study of catastrophe bonds pricing for China’s flood | ||
| Journal of Mathematics and Modeling in Finance | ||
| دوره 3، شماره 2، اسفند 2023، صفحه 191-207 اصل مقاله (533.56 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/jmmf.2024.77890.1118 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| S. Pourmohammad Azizi* 1؛ RajabAli Ghasempour2؛ Amirhossein Nafei3 | ||
| 1Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan | ||
| 2Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Caserta, Italy | ||
| 3Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan | ||
| چکیده | ||
| This study explores the application of dynamic systems for modeling and valuing catastrophe bonds to establish a more intelligent and adaptive approach to determining their volatility parameter. These financial instruments hold significant importance for insurance companies in safeguarding against the risk of insolvency stemming from the escalating frequency and severity of natural disasters worldwide. Employing mathematical principles, this research formulated a pricing partial differential equation and introduced a dynamic system for its resolution. The damage model was assumed to follow a stochastic process, and a radial basis neural network was utilized to estimate the volatility parameter of this stochastic process by leveraging historical data. The study scrutinized the pricing framework of catastrophe bonds related to floods and storms in China, ultimately demonstrating that the proposed methodology proved effective and computationally efficient when contrasted with alternative approaches. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Dynamical Systems؛ Catastrophe Bonds؛ Pricing؛ Volatility؛ Radial Basis Function Neural Networks | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] S. P. Azizi, Chien Yi Huang, Ti An Chen, Shu Chuan Chen, Amirhossein Nafei, Bitcoin Volatility Forecasting: An Artificial Differential Equation Neural Network, AIMS Mathematics, 8 (2023), No. 6, pp. 13907-13922. [2] T. Bjork ¨ , Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time, 2009, Oxford University Press. [3] K. Burnecki, M. N. Giuricich, Stable Weak Approximation at Work in Index-linked Catastrophe Bond Pricing, Risks, 5 (2017), No. 4, Art. 64. [4] G. Castellacci, Y. Choi, Financial Instability Contagion: A Dynamical Systems Approach, Quantitative Finance, 14 (2014), pp. 1243-1255. [5] V. Cheriyan, A. J. Kleywegt, A Dynamical Systems Model of Price Bubbles and Cycles, Quantitative Finance, 16 (2016), pp. 309-336. [6] Y. Choi, Masked Instability: Within-Sector Financial Risk in the Presence of Wealth Inequality, Risks, 6 (2018), No. 3, Art. 65. [7] Y. Choi, R. Douady, Financial Crisis Dynamics: Attempt to Define a Market Instability Indicator, Quantitative Finance, 12 (2012), pp. 1351-1365. [8] F. A. De Scally, Evaluation of Storm Surge Risk: A Case Study from Rarotonga, Cook Islands, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 7 (2014), pp. 9-27. [9] R. GhasemPour, S. Pourmohammad Azizi, Sajad Ahmad Waloo, LOEX Option: A Combination of Exchange Option and Lookback Option, Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1 (2024), No. 1, pp. 50-58. [10] J. C. Hull, Options, Futures and Other Derivatives, 2003, Pearson Education India. [11] E. Jondeau, S. Poon, M. Rockinger, Financial Modeling Under Non-Gaussian Distributions, 2007, Springer Science & Business Media. [12] F. C. Klebaner, Introduction to Stochastic Calculus with Applications, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2012. [13] Z. Ma, C. Ma, Pricing Catastrophe Risk Bonds: A Mixed Approximation Method, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 52 (2013), pp. 243-254. [14] T. Mai, S. Mushtaq, K. Reardon-Smith, P. Webb, R. Stone, J. Kath, Duc-Anh An-Vo, Defining Flood Risk Management Strategies: A Systems Approach, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 47 (2020), pp. 101550. [15] A. J. McNeil, R. Frey, P. Embrechts, Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools - Revised Edition, 2015, Princeton University Press. [16] E. G. Mehlabani, A. Chandramohanan, Intersecting Realms: Analyzing Impediments to Efficient Transit Operations in Maritime Ports, Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1 (2024), No. 1, pp. 28-39. [17] A. Nafei, C. Huang, S. Chen, Kuang-Zong Huo, Yi-Ching Lin, Hadi Nasseri, Neutrosophic Autocratic Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Strategies for Building Material Supplier Selection, Buildings, 13 (2023), No. 6, pp. 1373. [18] M. Nezhadkian, M. Quan, S. M. Azimi, An Optimal Strategy to Change the NonChangeable Assets, Management Analytics and Social Insights, 1 (2024), No. 1, pp. 17-27. [19] S. Pourmohammad Azizi, Abdolsadeh Neisy, A New Approach in Geometric Brownian Motion Model, In Fuzzy Information and Engineering and Decision, 2017, Springer, pp. 336- 342. [20] S. Pourmohammad Azizi, Abdolsadeh Neisy, Sajad Ahmad Waloo, A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Learning, International Journal of Computational Methods, (2023), pp. 2350007. [21] A. J. Unger, Pricing Index-based Catastrophe Bonds: Part 1: Formulation and Discretization Issues using a Numerical PDE Approach, Computers & Geosciences, 36 (2010), pp. 139-149. [22] S. Wiggins, Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos, Volume 2, 2003, Springer Science & Business Media. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 194 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 177 |
||