هابرماس در تلگرام؛ تحلیل حوزۀ عمومی و کنش ارتباطی در مکالمه‌های روزنامه‌نگاران ایرانی در رسانه‌های اجتماعی

-         هران (1395) ثبت دوباره انجمن صنفی روزنامه‌نگاران، این بار برای تهران، دریافت شده از سایت تهران در تاریخ 9 دی 1396 از آدرس: https://goo.gl/GgmRvN

-         خانیکی، هادی؛ اتابک، محمد و عزیزی، فرید (1396) تحلیل وضعیت شبکه‌های اجتماعی مجازی در ایران با رویکرد حوزۀ عمومی هابرماس (مورد مطالعه چند گروه فیس‌بوکی)، فصلنامه مطالعات فرهنگ- ارتباطات، دوره 18، شماره 37.

-         علیخواه، فردین (1378) کنش ارتباطی، بنیاد شکوفایی حوزه عمومی: اندیشه‌های یورگن ‌هابرماس، اطلاعات سیاسی اقتصادی، ش 140- 139.

-         کرمانی، حسین (1395) مشاهدۀ مشارکتی در گروه‌های تلگرامی؛ راهنمای عمل و نمونه موردی، فصلنامه مطالعات فرهنگ- ارتباطات، دوره 17، شماره 35.

-         ریتزر، جورج (1393) نظریه جامعه‌شناسی در دوران معاصر، محسن ثلاثی، تهران، علمی، چاپ ششم.

-          Bruns, A., & Highfield, T. (2015). Is Habermas on Twitter? Social Media and the Public Sphere. In The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics (pp. 56–73). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716299

-          Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

-          Denzin, N. K. (2017). Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook, 6th edition. Routledge.

-          Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media and the Public Sphere. tripleC, 12(1), 57–101.

-          Fulya ŞEN. (2012). THE SOCIAL MEDIA AS A PUBLIC SPHERE: THE RISE OF SOCIAL OPPOSITION. In International Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design (pp. 490–494). Istanbul. Retrieved from http://www.cmdconf.net/2012/Proceedings/Proceedings.pdf

-          Gibson, W., & Brown, A. (2009). Working with Qualitative Data. London: SAGE Publications.

-          Gunn, W., & Løgstrup, L. B. (2014). Participant observation, anthropology methodology and design anthropology research inquiry. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 13(4), 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022214543874

-          Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. MIT Press (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1086/228287

-          Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2072652

-          Hodkinson, P. (2007). Interactive online journals and individualization. New Media & Society, 9(4), 625–650. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807076972

-          Hopke, J. E. (2015). Hashtagging Politics : Transnational Anti-Fracking Movement Twitter Practices. Social Media + Society, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115605521

-          Iosifidis, P., & Wheeler, M. (2016). Public Spheres and Mediated Social Networks in the Western Context and Beyond. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-41030-6

-          Johannessen, M. R. (2013). Social media as public sphere : a stakeholder perspective. University of Agder. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-01-2015-0003

-          Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003

-          KhosraviNik, M. (2017). Social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS). In J. Flowerdew & J. Richardson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 582–596). London: Routledge.

-          Kitzinger, C. (2000). Doing Feminist Conversation Analysis. Feminism & Psychology, 10(2), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002001

-          Kraidy, M. M., & Krikorian, M. R. (2017). The revolutionary public sphere: The case of the Arab uprisings. Communication and the Public, 2(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047317717499

-          Macnamara, J. (2008). Internet Media and the Public Sphere: The 2007 Australian E-Eelectioneering Experience. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture Policy, (129), 7. Retrieved from http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=909506313612628;res=IELHSS

-          Mahlouly, D. (2013). Rethinking the Public Sphere in a Digital Environment : Similarities between the Eighteenth and the Twenty-First Centuries. eSharp: New Horizons, (20), 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.gla.ac.uk/research/az/esharp/issues/20spring2013-newhorizons/

-          Mottahedeh, N. (2015). #iranelection: Hashtag Solidarity and the Transformation of Online Life. Soft Skull Press.

-          Papacharissi, Z. (2004). Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media & Society, 6(2), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444

-          Papacharissi, Z. (2014). Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

-          Reed, L., & Boyd, D. (2016). Who Controls the Public Sphere in an Era of Algorithms ? Questions and Assumptions.

-          Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444328301

-          Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: SAGE.

-          Stanley, J. W., & Weare, C. (2004). The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation: Evidence From an Agency Online Discussion Forum. Administration & Society, 36(5), 503–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704268503

-          ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. London. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

-          Toerien, M. (2014). Conversations and conversation analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: SAGE Publications.

-          Vatikiotis, P., & Yörük, Z. F. (2016). Gezi Movement and the Networked Public Sphere: A Comparative Analysis in Global Context. Social Media and Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116662184

-          Yang, S., Quan-Haase, A., & Rannenberg, K. (2016). The changing public sphere on Twitter: Network structure, elites and topics of the #righttobeforgotten. New Media & Society, 146144481665140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816651409