تقابل سازکار حمایت از شهود و بزهدیدگان با حقّ متهم بر دادرسی علنی (مطالعه در نظام بین‌‌المللی حقوق بشر)

• اختری، عباس و مؤذن‌‌زادگان، حسنعلی (1398)، «جایگاه حقوق بزهدیده در مرحله‌‌ی تحقیقات مقدماتی از منظر قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری ایران»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، دوره‌‌ی 7، شماره‌‌ی 26.
• جلالی، محمد و سودبر، سوگل (1399)، «تأثیر دیوان اروپایی حقوق بشر در نظام حقوق داخلی دولت‌‌های اروپایی»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره‌‌ی 11، شماره‌‌ی 1.
• راسته، مرتضی؛ توجهی، عبدالعلی و نعمتی، مژگان (1401)، «همسنجی مؤلفه‌‌های دادرسی علنی در نظام بین‌‌المللی حقوق بشر و نظام دادرسی کیفری ایران»، پژوهش‌‌های حقوق جزا و جرم‌‌شناسی، دوره‌‌ی 10، شماره‌‌ی 20.
• راسته، مرتضی؛ مؤذن‌‌زادگان، حسنعلی و دولتخواه پاشاکی، پیمان (1401)، «مطالعه‌‌ی تطبیقی استثنائات حضور افراد در جلسه دادرسی کیفری؛ نظام بین‌‌المللی حقوق بشر و نظام کیفری ایران»، مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرم‌‌شناسی، دوره‌‌ی 52، شماره‌‌ی 2.
• رضوی‌‌فرد، بهزاد و دیرباز، مرضیه (1392)، «حمایت‌های حقوقی دیوان کیفری بین‌‌المللی از بزهدیدگان»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، دوره‌‌ی 2، شماره‌‌ی 3.
• رضوی‌‌فرد، بهزاد و قربان‌زاده، حسین (1395)، «حق بر علنی بودن دادرسی بعنوان یکی از حقوق دفاعی متهم در رویه‌‌ی دادگاه‌‌های کیفری بین‌‌المللی»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی، دوره‌‌ی 7، شماره‌‌ی 1.
• کوشکی، غلامحسن و امینی، زهرا (1396)، «بررسی تطبیقی حمایت از شهود در قانون آیین دادرسی کیفری ایران و منشور شهود انگلستان»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، دوره‌‌ی 6، شماره‌‌ی 21.
• مهرا، نسرین و قلی‌‌پور، غلامرضا (1400)، «اساسی‌‌سازی نسبیِ دادرسی منصفانه در قانون اساسی مشروطه»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، دوره‌‌ی 9، شماره‌‌ی 34.
• والین، لوک (1385)، «قربانیان و شهود در حقوق بین‌‌المللی؛ از حقّ حمایت تا حقّ بیان»، ترجمه‌‌ی توکل حبیب‌‌زاده و مجتبی جعفری، مجله‌‌ی حقوقی بین‌‌المللی، دوره‌‌ی 23، شماره‌‌ی 34.

ب. انگلیسی

Books and Article

• Akhtari, Abbas and HasanAli MoazenZadegan (2019), “Victim’s Rights in Preliminary Investigations in the Context of the Iranian Criminal Procedure Code”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Vol.7, No.26. [In Persian]
• Bassiouni, Cherif (1994), The Protection of Human Rights in the Administration of Criminal Justice: A Compendium of United Nations Norms and Standards, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
• Bentham, Jeremy (1838), The Works of Jeremy Bentham, 7 (Introductory View of the Rationale of Judicial Evidence), Edinburgh: William Tait.
• Bicskei, Tamás and Others (2018), “Content Creators v. Judges: How Open Can a Courtroom be in the Information Age?”, EJTN Themis Semi-Final D - Judicial Ethics and Professional Conduct, Vol.19, No.2.
• Cooper, Gilead (2019), “Open (in)Justice: Privacy, Open Justice and Human Rights”, Trusts & Trustees, Oxford University Press, Vol.25, No.7.
• Dadwal, Lalit (2019), “Open Justice and Rule of Law: Indian Scenario”, International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, Vol.6, No.1.
• Donat-Cattin, David (2008), Article 68; Protection of Victims and Witnesses and their Participation in the Proceedings, in Otto Triffterer and Kai Ambos (eds.), Commentary on The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court; Observer’s Notes, Article by Article, Oxford: Nomos.
• Gaurav Gupta, Nishant (2001), Report on Protection of witnesses, New Dehli: National Law Institute University.
• Grozev, Yonko and Others (2009), Right to a Fair Trial under the European Convention On Human Rights (Article 6), London: InterIghts.
• Hall-Coates, Shauna (2015), “Following Digital Media into the Courtroom: Publicity and the Open Court Principle in the Information Age”, Dalhousie Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.24, No.4.
• Jalali Mohammad and Soodbar Sogol (2020), “The Impact of European Court of Human Rights on National Legal Order”, Comparative Law Review, Vol.11, No.1. [In Persian]
• Kooshki, GholamHasan and Zahra Amini (2018), “Comparative study the Protection of witnesses in the Code of Criminal Procedure of Iran and the Charter of the UK witnesses”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Vol.6, No21. [In Persian]
• Lepofsky, David (1995), “Cameras in the Courtroom — Not Without My Consent”, National Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol.6, No.1.
• Maffei, Stefano (2012), The Right to Confrontation in Europe: Absent, Anonymous and Vulnerable Witnesses, Amsterdam: Europa Law Publishing.
• Mehra, Nasrin and Gholipour Gholamreza (2021), Fair Trial partial Constitutionalization in the Mashruteh Constitution, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Vol.9, No34. [In Persian]
• New South Wales Department of Justice (2012), Supporting Victims and Witnesses of Crime Through the Court, Process, (Justice Journey Court Preparation Guide), Sydney: Victims Services.
• Nicholls, Jesse (2017), “Open Justice and Developments in the Law on Anonymity; Access to Material on the Court File and Reporting Restrictions”, Doughty Street Chambers, Vol,23, No.3.
• Pejic, Jelena and Lesnie, Vanessa (2000), What Is a Fair Trial (A Basic Guide to Legal Standards and Practice), New York: Lawyers Committee for Human Rights.
• Rasteh, Morteza; Tavajohi, Abdilali and Nemati, Mozhgan (2023), “Comparison of the Components of the Public Hearing in the International Human Rights System and Iranian Criminal Proceeding System”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol.10, No.20. [In Persian]
• Rasteh, Morteza; Moa, zenZadegan, HasanAli and Dolatkhah Pashaki, Peyman (2023), “Comparative Study of Exceptions to the Attendance the People in Criminal Hearing; International Human Right System and Iranian Criminal System”, Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, 52, No.2. [In Persian]
• Razavifard, Behzad and Dirbaz, Marzyeh (2013), “ICC Legal Protections of Victims”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Vol.1, No.3. [In Persian]
• Razavifard, Behzad and Ghorbanzadeh, Hossein (2016), “The right to public proceeding as one of the defensive rights of the accused in international criminal tribunals procedure”, Comparative Law Review, Vol.7, No.1. [In Persian]
• Robinson, Mary (2009), Trial Observation Manual for Criminal Proceedings: Practitioners Guide No.5, Geneva: International Commission of Jurists.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2011), The Criminal Justice Response to Support Victims of Acts of Terrorism, Vienna: Publishing and Library Section United Nations Office.
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2008), Good practices for the protection of witnesses in criminal proceedings involving organized crime, Vienna: Publishing and Library Section United Nations Office.
• Walleyn, Luc (2006), “Victimes et témoins de crimes internationaux: du droit à une protection au droit à la parole”, Translators: Tavakol Habibzadeh and Mojtaba Jafari, International Law Review, Vol.23, No.34. [In Persian]

Cases and Reports

• Case of Al-Khawaja and Tahery v. The United Kingdom, ECtHR (No. 26766/05), 2009.
• Case of Artemov v. Russia, ECtHR (No. 14945/03), 2014.
• Case of Asto and Rojas v. Peru, IACtHR (Ser. C No. 137), 2005.
• Case of Biryukov v. Russia, ECtHR (No. 14810/02), 2008.
• Case of Chaushev and Others v. Russia, ECtHR (No. 37037/03; 39053/03 and 2469/04), 2016.
• Case of Doorson v. The Netherlands, ECtHR (No. 20524/92), 1996.
• Case of Francis v. Jamaica, HRC (No. 320/1988), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/47 /D/320/1988, March 24, 1993.
• Case of Hulki Gunes v. Turkey, ECtHR (No. 28490/95), 2003.
• Case of Kartoyev and Others Russia, ECtHR (Nos. 9418/13; 9421/13 and 49007/13), 2021.
• Case of Kostovski v. The Netherlands, ECtHR (No. 11454/85), 1989.
• Case of Kovač Croatia, ECtHR (No. 503/05), 2007.
• Case of Mirilashvili v. Russia, ECtHR (No. 6293/04), 2008.
• Case of Sutter v. Switzerland, ECtHR (No. 8209/78), 1984.
• Case of Tierce And Others v. San Marino, ECtHR (Nos. 24954/94, 24971/94 and 24972/94), 2000.
• Case of Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic A/K/A "DULE" , ICTY (Decision on the Prosecutor's Motion Requesting Protective Measures for Victims and Witnesses), 1995.
• Case of Van Mechelen and Others v. The Netherlands, ECtHR (No. 21363/93), 1997.
• General Comment No.32: Article 14: Right to Equality Before Courts and Tribunals and to a Fair Trial, HRC (U.N. Doc. No. CCPR/C/GC/32), 2007.
• Second Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia, IACmHR (OEA/Ser. L/V/II. 84, Doc. 39 rev), 1993.
• Second Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Peru, IACmHR (OEA/Ser. L/V/II. 106, Doc.59 rev), 2000.
• The Mayagna (Sumo) Awas Tingni Community Case, IACtHR (Series C, No. 79), 2001.
• Third Report on the Situation of Human Rights in Colombia, IACmHR (OEA/Ser. L/V/II. 102, Doc. 9 rev.1), 1999.

International Documents

• American Convention on Human Rights (1969).
• Convention of the Organization of The Islamic Conference on Combating International Terrorism (1999).
• Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power (1985).
• European Convention on Human Rights (1950).
• International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966).
• Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Fair Trial and Legal Assistance in Africa (2003).
• United Nations Convention against Corruption (2003).
• United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime (2000).
• Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act (1999).

Websites

• https://corteidh.or.cr
• https://hudoc.echr.coe.int
• https://oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/witness_2
• https://thelawdictionary.org/witness-n/#ixzz2cm686Dz8
• https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/rape-statistics-by-country
• Streicker, Sherilyn, Criminal Trial Publicity, available at: https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/criminal-trial-publicity