- توحیدی، احمدرضا، افضلپور، فاطمه. (1399)، «تحلیلی بر نحوهی ارائهی ادله و استنادپذیری دادههای سنجش از راه دور در محاکم بینالمللی»، فصلنامهی تحقیقات حقوقی، شمارهی 90. https://doi.org/10.29252/lawresearch.23.90.263
- جلالیفراهانی، امیرحسین. (1386). «استنادپذیری ادلهی الکترونیکی در امور کیفری»، حقوق اسلامی، شمارهی 15.
- حیدری، مهدی. (1400). «حدود و ثغور ارزش اثباتی ادله الکترونیکی در حقوق کیفری»، همایش علمی مطالعات حقوقی، علوم قضایی و پژوهشهای اجتماعی.
- خداخواه، نسیم. (1397). «حقوق بزهدیده و متهم در دیوان کیفری بینالمللی»، وکیل مدافع، دورهی 8، شمارهی 17.
- داودی بیرق، حسین (۱۳۸۷). ادله اثبات دعاوی حقوقی در فضای سایبر و مجازی، پایاننامهی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدهی حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز.
- روحبخش، فرزاد (۱۴۰۲). اسناد الکترونیک در دادرسی مدنی، پایاننامهی کارشناسی ارشد حقوق خصوصی، دانشکدهی حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه شیراز.
- زاپالا، سالواتور. (1387). حقوق بشر در محاکمات کیفری بینالمللی، ترجمهی حسین آقائی جنت مکان، چ 1، اهواز، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز.
- السان، مصطفی، منوچهری، محمدرضا. (1397). «ارزیابی اصالت ادلهی الکترونیکی و ارزش اثباتی آنها»، مطالعات حقوقی، دورهی 2، شمارهی 10. https://doi.org/10.22099/jls.2018.28058.2765
- علیدوستی شهرکی، ناصر، کشاورز، علی و صادقی اصل، علیرضا. (1401)، «قاعدهگزینی جهت پذیرش ادلهی الکترونیک در نظام حقوقی ایران و آمریکا»، مجلهی حقوقی دادگستری، دورهی 86، شمارهی 119. https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2021.530190.4171
- فضائلی، مصطفی. (1387). دادرسی عادلانه: محاکمات کیفری بینالمللی، چ 1، تهران، مؤسسهی مطالعات و پژوهشهای حقوقی شهردانش.
- فیضی چکاب، غلام نبی، «اعتبار حقوقی دلیل و امضای الکترونیکی (مرور اجمالی برخی منابع ملی و بینالمللی)». (1389)، پژوهش حقوق و سیاست، سال دوازدهم، شمارهی 30.
- مؤذنزادگان، حسنعلی، سلیمان دهکردی، الهام و یوشی، مهشید. (1394)، «حفظ صحت و استنادپذیری ادلهی الکترونیک با استفاده از بیومتریک و رمزنگاری»، پژوهش حقوق کیفری، سال چهارم، شمارهی دوازدهم. https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2015.1782
- مؤذنزادگان، حسنعلی، شایگان، محمدرسول. (1388)، «استنادپذیری و تحصیل ادلهی الکترونیکی در حقوق کیفری ایران»، فصلنامهی دیدگاههای حقوقی، شمارهی 48.
- محمدی، سام، میری، حمید. (1388). «بررسی تطبیقی ارائهی ادلهی الکترونیک در دادگاه؛ اشکال و اعتبار آن»، فصلنامهی علمی حقوق تطبیقی دانشگاه مفید، شمارهی 17.
- نجفی، سینا. (1398). «واکاوی معایب و مزایای سیستم رسیدگی و تعیین مجازات در دیوان کیفری بینالمللی»، فصلنامهی بینالمللی قانونیار، دورهی 11، شمارهی 3.
ب. انگلیسی
- “Trial of the Major War Criminals Before the International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg: International Military Tribunal”, vol. Xlll, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947.
- Aalto-Setälä, S. et al. (2021). Leiden Guidelines on the Use of Digitally Derived Evidence in International Criminal Courts and Tribunals.
- Arcos Tejerizo, M. (2023). “Digital evidence and fair trial rights at the International Criminal Court”. Leiden Journal of International Law, No. 36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156523000031
- Ashouri, A., Bowers, C., Warden, C. (2014). “An Overview of the Use of Digital Evidence in International Criminal Courts”, The 2013 Salzburg Workshop on Cyber Investigations, Vol.11. https://doi.org/10.14296/deeslr.v11i0.2130
- Avveduto, S., Conti, S., Luzi, L., Pisacane, L., (2018). The Conceptual Representation of the “Electronic Evidence” Domain; Handling and Exchanging Electronic Evidence Across Europe, Vol.39, Switzerland, Springer.
- Braga da Silva, R., (2021). “Updating the Authentication of Digital Evidence in the International Criminal Court”, International Criminal Law Review, 22, No.5-6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10083
- Freeman, L., (2019). “Prosecuting Atrocity Crimes with Open Source Evidence: Lessons from the International Criminal Court”, in: Digital Witness Using Open Source Information for Human Rights Investigation, Documentation, and Accountability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Freeman, L., (2021). “Hacked and Leaked: Legal Issues Arising From the Use of Unlawfully Obtained Digital Evidence in International Criminal Cases”, UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, Vol. 25, No.2.
- Freeman, L., Vazquez Llorente, R., (2021). “Finding the Signal in the Noise: Finding the Signal in the Noise: International Criminal Evidence and Procedure in the Digital Age”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, Issue. 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab023
- Gillet, M., Fan, W. (2023). “Expert Evidence and Digital Open Source Information: Bringing Online Evidence to the Courtroom”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 21, Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqad050
- Hellwig, K., (2022). “The Potential and the Challenges of Digital Evidence in International Criminal Proceedings”, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10110
- Human Rights Center UC Berkeley (2014). Digital Fingerprints: Using Electronic Evidence to Advance Prosecutions at the International Criminal Court.
- ICC-01/04-01/06, PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I, 29 January 2007.
- ICC-01/04-01/07, TRIAL CHAMBER II, 17 December 2010.
- ICC-01/04-02/06-1838, TRIAL CHAMBER VI, 28 March 2017.
- ICC-01/04-02/06, TRIAL CHAMBER VI, 8 July 2019.
- ICC-01/05-01/08-2299-Red, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 08 October 2012.
- ICC-01/05-01/08, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 21 March 2016.
- ICC-01/05-01/08, TRIAL CHAMBER III, 27 June 2013.
- ICC-01/05-01/13, TRIAL CHAMBER VII, 9 October 2015.
- ICTR-98-44-T, Trial Chamber III, 25 January 2008.
- IT-05-88/2-T, Prosecutor v Tolimir (Judgement), Trial Chamber II, 12 December 2012.
- Janfalk, D., (2021). Fact-Finding Online – A Fair Trial Offline? An Analysis of the Admissibility of Digital Open-Source Evidence in Relation to Trial Fairness at the International Criminal Court, Master’s thesis, faculty of law, Lund University.
- Kayyali, D., Althaibani, R., Ng, Y. (2021). “Digital Video Evidence, When Collected, Verified, Stored, and Deployed Properly, Presents New Opportunities for Justice”, Last visited: July 23, 2024, at: https://iccforum.com/cyber-evidence
- Koenig, A., Irving, E., McDermott, Y., Murray, D., (2021). “New Technologies and the Investigation of International Crimes: An Introduction”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 19, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab040
- Lane, A. (2021). “Atrocities on Camera: Solutions to Admissibility Issues with Digital Evidence at the International Criminal Court”, Last visited: July 20, 2024, at: https://bytes.scl.org/untitled/
- Laving, L., (2014). The Reliability of Open Source Evidence In the International Criminal Court, Master Thesis, International Human Rights Law, Lund University.
- Mimran, T., Weinstein, L. (2023), “DIGITALIZE IT: DIGITAL EVIDENCE AT THE ICC”, Last visited: July 2, 2024, at: https://lieber.westpoint.edu/digitalize-it-digital-evidence-icc/
- Mossé Cyber Security Institute, “Digital Forensics: Hashing for Data Integrity”, 2022, last visited: 5 January 2025, available at: Digital Forensics: Hashing for Data Integrity — MCSI Library
- Niezen, R. (2023). “International Criminal Court is using digital evidence to investigate Putin – but how can it tell if a video or photo is real or fake?”, Last visited: July 20, 2024 at: https://theconversation.com
- Osco Escobedo Miguel, A., et al. (2023). “digital evidence as a means of proof in criminal proceedings”, russian law journal, Volume XI, Issue 5. https://dx.doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i5s.895
- OTP (2023). OFFICE OF THE PROSECUTOR POLICY ON CHILDREN.
- Prosecutor v. Zlatko Aleksovski, DECISION ON PROSECUTOR’S APPEAL ON ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE, ICTY, Appeals Chamber, 16 February 1999.
- Public International Law & Policy Group (2022). Chain of Custody In International Courts Training For Civil Society Documenters,
- Quilling, Ch. (2022). “The Future of Digital Evidence Authentication at the International Criminal Court, Journal of Public & International Affairs”, Online at: https://jpia.princeton.edu
- Ragni, Ch. (2023). Digital evidence in international criminal proceedings and human rights challenges, EU and comparative law issues and challenges series (ECLIC), Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28255
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, 17 July 1998.
- Roscini, M., (2016). “Digital Evidence as a Means of Proof before the International Court of Justice”, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, Vol. 21, Issue. 3. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcsl/krw016
- SCSL-03-01-T-745, PROSECUTOR v. Charles Ghankay TAYLOR, TRIAL CHAMBER II, 25 February 2009.
- Silva, Jason, WHAT IS METADATA AND WHY IS IT CRITICAL TO A FORENSIC INVESTIGATION?, 27 Sep 2016, Last visited: 5 Jul 2024, at: https://cornerstonediscovery.com
- Stavrou, K. (2021). “Open-Source Digital Evidence in International Criminal Cases: A Way Forward in Ensuring Accountability for Core Crimes?”, Last visited: August 3, 2024, at: https://opiniojuris.org/2021/01/26/
- STL-11-01/T/TC, Prosecutor v Ayyash et al (Decision on the Prosecution Motions for the Admission of the Call Sequence Tables Related to the Five Colour-Coded Mobile Telephone Groups and Networks), Trial Chamber, 31 October 2016.
- The Center for Research Libraries (2012). Human Rights Electronic Evidence Study.
- The International Bar Association (2016). Evidence Matters in ICC Trials”, 2016.
Translated References into English
- Alidousti Shahraki, Naser; Keshavarz, Ali; Sadeghi Asl, Alireza. “Rule-Making for the Acceptance of Electronic Evidence in the Legal Systems of Iran and the United States,” Justice Law Journal, vol. 86, no. 119, 2022, https://doi.org/10.22106/jlj.2021.530190.4171. [In Persia]
- Davoudi Bairagh, Hossein. Evidence in Civil Litigation in Cyber and Virtual Space, Master’s Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, 2008. [In Persia]
- Elsan, Mostafa; Manouchehri, Mohammadreza. “Evaluation of the Authenticity and Evidentiary Value of Electronic Evidence,” Legal Studies, vol. 2, no. 10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.22099/jls.2018.28058.2765. [In Persia]
- Fazaeli, Mostafa. Fair Trial: International Criminal Proceedings, 1st ed., Tehran: Shahr-e-Danesh Institute for Legal Studies and Research, 2008. [In Persia]
- Feyzi Chakab, Gholam Nabi. “The Legal Validity of Evidence and Electronic Signatures (A Brief Review of Some National and International Sources),” Law and Politics Research, vol. 12, no. 30, 2010. [In Persia]
- Heidari, Mehdi. “The Limits and Scope of the Evidentiary Value of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Law,” Scientific Conference on Legal Studies, Judicial Sciences, and Social Research, 2021. [In Persia]
- Jalali-Farahani, Amirhossein. “The Admissibility of Electronic Evidence in Criminal Matters,” Islamic Law, no. 15, 2007. [In Persia]
- Khodakhah, Nasim. “The Rights of Victims and Defendants in the International Criminal Court,” Vakilmodafe, vol. 8, no. 17, 2018. In Persia]
- Moazenzadegan, Hossein-Ali; Shayegan, Mohammad Resoul. “The Admissibility and Collection of Electronic Evidence in Iranian Criminal Law,” Legal Perspectives Quarterly, no. 48, 2009. [In Persia]
- Moazenzadegan, Hossein-Ali; Soleiman Dehkordi, Elham; Youshi, Mahshid. “Ensuring Integrity and Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Using Biometrics and Encryption,” Criminal Law Research, vol. 4, no. 12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2015.1782. [In Persia]
- Mohammadi, Sam; Miri, Hamid. “A Comparative Study of the Presentation of Electronic Evidence in Courts: Forms and Validity,” Comparative Law Scientific Quarterly, Mofid University, no. 17, 2009. [In Persia]
- Najafi, Sina. “An Analysis of the Advantages and Disadvantages of the Trial and Sentencing System in the International Criminal Court,” International ghanoonyar Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3, 2019. [In Persia]
- Rouhbakhsh, Farzad. Electronic Documents in Civil Procedure, Master’s Thesis in Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Shiraz University, 2023. [In Persia]
- Tohidi, Ahmadreza; Afsalpour, Fatemeh. “An Analysis of the Presentation and Admissibility of Remote Sensing Data in International Courts,” Legal Research Quarterly, no. 90, 2020, https://doi.org/10.29252/lawresearch.23.90.263. [In Persia]
- Zappalà, Salvatore. Human Rights in International Criminal Trials, trans. Hossein Aghaei Jannat Makan, 1st ed., Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, 2008. [In Persia]
|