Welfare State, and the Binary of Social Democracy/Liberal Democracy | ||
| دولت پژوهی | ||
| Article 2, Volume 6, Issue 21, July 2020, Pages 29-57 PDF (322.78 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22054/tssq.2020.41940.697 | ||
| Author | ||
| Morteza Mardiha* | ||
| Associate Professor, Department of Social Communication, Allameh Tabataba’I University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| In recent modernity era, especially between big war and the annihilation of communism, the most important political division in democratic countries has been the duality of Right/Left. Often the two biggest rival parties, apart from their different names, have been representing two tendencies, the social democracy and the liberal democracy. The main difference between these two positions has been about functionality and ethicality of welfare state. Our question in this article is the following: From the point view of social and economic mechanism, the intersection of democratic countries is closer to system of preferences of social democracy or liberal democracy? It is to corroboration that, somewhat contrary to the twentieth century, a scientific-experimental and realistic approach to the social planning makes these two positions convergent in a pragmatist framework, and, despite of a propagandist atmosphere of challenge, their theoretical and ideological differences are leaving their seriousness and functionality. The conflict of Tax versus services is transferring from an ideological and ethical principle to a subject for a limited and temporary examination among a group of experts. The existence of welfare state is no more a problem, it is its ranges and limitations which is a subject of discussion and decision. Even the domain of disagreement here is to reduce. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| State; Social Service; General Budget; Social Planning; Tax | ||
| References | ||
الف) فارسیبودن، ریمون، (1394)، چرا روشنفکران لیبرالیسم را دوست ندارند؟، ترجمه مرتضی مردیها، تهران: نشر مینوی خرد. رالز، جان، (1390)، نظریۀ عدالت، ترجمه مرتضی بحرانی، تهران: نشر پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات فرهنگی. زدلاچک، توماس، (1397)، اقتصاد خیر و شر؛ از گیل گمش تا وال استریت، ترجمه احد علیقلیان، تهران: نشر فرهنگ نشر نو. فون هایک، فردریش، (1382)، در سنگر آزادی، ترجمه عزت فولادوند، تهران: نشر لوح فکر. فون هایک، فردریش، (1390)، راه بردگی، ترجمه فریدون تفضلی، تهران: نشر نگاه معاصر. کوپر، سایمون، (1397)، «مکرون چطور دل ملتی را ربود؟»، مجله اندیشه پویا، شماره 49. مارتن دوگار، روژه، (1368)، خانوادۀ تیبو، ترجمۀ ابوالحسن نجفی، تهران: نشر نیلوفر. نوح هراری، یووال، (1397)، 21 درس برای قرن 21، ترجمه سودابه قیصری، تهران: نشر پارسه. نوزیک، رابرت، (1395)، بی دولتی، دولت، آرمان شهر، ترجمه محسن رنجبر، تهران: نشر مرکز. ب) انگلیسیBardhan, Pranab; Roemer, John, (1992), “Market Socialism, A Case for Rejuvenation” Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 6, N. 3. Berlin, Isaiah, (2014), Political Ideas in the Romantic Age, Princton and Axford, Prinston University Press. Bok, Derek, (2010), The Politics of Happiness, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press. Braithwaite, Florence, (2013), “Margaret Thatcher, Individualism and Welfare State”, History and Policy, http://www.historyandpolicy.org/opinion-articles/articles/margaret-thatcher-individualism-and-the-welfare-state. Brochman, G. and Hagelund, A, (2011), “Migrants in the Scandinavian Welfare State: Emergence of a Social Policy Problem”, Nordic Journal of Migration Researches, Vol. 1, N. 1, pp. 13-24, (Quoted from Pederson 2017). Brownstein. Richard (1982), “The Culture of Reaganism”, New Republic, 25 October. Dewey, John, (1999), Liberalism and Social Action, Prometheus Books. In: https://www.google.com/search?q=Liberalism+and+ Social+Action+(1935)+pdf&oq=Liberalism+and+Social+Action+(1935)+pdf&aqs, p. 626 Editorial of the Economist, (2013), “The Next Supermodel”, Economist, 2 febrvery 2013. Editorial of the NewYork Times (2004), Ronald Reagan, The NewYork Times, 7 June. https://www.nytimes.com/2004/ 06/07/opinion/ronald-reagan.html. FEE, Foundation for Economic Education, (2016), “The Myth of Scandinavian Socialism”, https://www.google/amp. Floud, Roderick (Ed.), (2004), The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Vol III, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. Frankfurt Declaration (1951), http:// www. Socialis International. org/ view Article. cfm? ArticleID=39. Krugman, Paul, (2012), “Reagan and Keynesianism”, The NewYork Times, 7June. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/08/opinion/krugman-reagan-was-a-keynesian.html. Moore, Henrietta, (2014), “Why Scandinavia is not Model for Global Prosperity we should all Pursue”, The Guardian, 1 Decembre 2014. Palumbo, Matt (2018), “Does Socialism Work in Scandinavia”? https://bongino com. Pierson, Chris (1996), “Social Policy under Thatcher and Major”, in: Ludlam S. (ed.) Contemporary British Conservatism, London, Palgrave. Piketty, Thomas, (2013), Le Capital au xxie Siècle, Paris, Seuil. From Pearlstein, Steven (2014) “Capital in the Twenty-first Century by Piketty”. From Washington Post, 28/3/ 2014. Rasmussen, Lars Lokke, (2015), https://www.vox.com/2015/10/31/9650030/denmark-prime-minister-bernie-sander. Sandel, Michael, (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press. Touraine, Alain, (1992), La Critique de la Modernité, Paris, Fayard. Vincent, Andrew, (2010), Modern Political Ideologies (Third ed.), John Wiley & Sons. Waniski, Jude, (1998), The Way the World Works, Gateway Edition, West Pederson, Axel and Kuhnel, Stein, (2017), ”The Nordic Welfare State Model”, in Kenutsen Oddbiorn (ed.), The Nordic Models in Political Science, Bergen, Fagbokforlaget. Wilentz, Sean, (2008), The Age of Reagan: A History: 1974-2008, NewYork, Harper. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 4,148 PDF Download: 1,509 |
||