- All Journals
- Communication Sciences
- ECO College of Insurance
- Economics
- Law and Political Sciences
- Management and Accounting
- Persian Literature and Foreign Languages
- Physical Education and Sport Sciences
- Psychology and Education
- Research
- Social Sciences
- Statistics, Mathematics, and Computer
- Theology and Islamic Studies
News
Identifying the Criteria for Assessing the Capacity of Fragile States in Planning for Development and Poverty Reduction | ||
| دولت پژوهی | ||
| Volume 9, Issue 33, May 2023, Pages 223-258 PDF (711.87 K) | ||
| Document Type: Research Paper | ||
| DOI: 10.22054/tssq.2023.63050.1147 | ||
| Authors | ||
| Nejat Mohammadifar* 1; Ehsan Kazemi2 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran | ||
| Abstract | ||
| Imagining government as a powerful and all-encompassing institution which effectively controls a geopolitical area has affected the basic role of this institution in the development discourse. Because the government is considered as the main basis of political, economic and social order, its representative role is significant. Today, many thinkers and international organizations believe that the government still plays an essential role in advancing the process of development and poverty reduction but the problem is that always some governments have not been able or willing to play the expected roles. Many governments, due to various social, political, economic and structural reasons do not have the ability and capacities necessary for carring out development and poverty reduction, or basically do not show much political desire and will in this regard. Since the 1990s, those states that their governments lack the necessary ability to perform normal functions and lead their society to development have been known as fragile states. This is a concept that is more related to developing countries. On the basis of this, the main question of the current research is "what are the criteria for evaluating the capacity and willingness of fragile states in planning for development and poverty reduction?" The research method used in this research is systematic review and information are collected using library tools and internet resources. The theoretical framework of the research is based on Torres and Anderson (2004). From the point of view of Torres and Anderson, the development capacities of a government include the foundations of government authority, administrative capacity and efficiency, economic efficiency and the effective exercise of political power. A government that lacks these capacities or has these features just to a limited extent will lose its capacity and ability to advance development and reduce poverty to a large extent. In addition, from thier point of view, along with these features, the political will for development and poverty reduction must exist at the top of the government. In other word there should be an explicit political statement that shows the commitment and desire of a government to advance development and poverty reduction programs. As well, in this direction, attention should be paid to the existence of strategies, tools and motivations for implementation, so that services are provided in the best possible way and has the character of inclusiveness. Finally, Torres and Anderson (2004) present a fourfold typology of governments (weak willingness and capacity governments, strong willingness and weak capacity governments, strong willingness and capacity governments, and weak willingness and strong capacity governments) that can be used to identify the criteria for evaluating the capacity of fragile states in development planning and poverty reduction. The results of the research findings show that governments in fragile states could have a proper planning in order to improve development capacities and reduce poverty by strengthening the foundations of authority, effective exercise of political power, efficiency in macroeconomic management, administrative capacity for implementation, along with the political commitment to reduce poverty and provide comprehensive services. Based on this, the governments that have weak political desire and will, even if they have the necessary capacities for development and poverty reduction, will not succeed. Similarly, those states that have a strong political desire and will but lack the necessary capacities, will not be successful. In transition countries, where governments are usually more fragile, rapid changes may lead to instability. Therefore, it should be emphasized on gradual reforms and more accountability of governments in these countries. As the Iraq experience clearly shows, dramatic changes—including a sudden move toward fully competitive elections—in countries with weak cohesion, fragile institutions, and a history of intergroup hostility can be highly explosive and undermine the entire reform agenda. So, it is better to give priority to solidarity and security and gradually carry out broader reforms in the field of development and poverty reduction so that do not explicitly threaten the status quo. Limits such as increasing transparency and carrying out budgeting methods, strengthening non-governmental organizations, creating a strong civil society, strengthening public cohesion and trust, increasing income and reducing unemployment, improving the rule of law and the government's capacity to judge and implement it can improve relations between governments and people and provide the basis for other actions. It seems that the biggest determining factors eventually are the government, its leadership, policies and institutions; This does not mean ignoring the role of the society as sustainable development requires roles of both government and society. The development-seeking government and the development-seeking society, with their desire and high capacities for development, are the key to success in the advancing development and poverty reduction. | ||
| Keywords | ||
| Government; Fragile State; Sustainable State; Development; Capacity | ||
| References | ||
|
Andersen, L. (2006). Security sector reform in fragile states. DIIS working paper. Baser, H., & Morgan, P. (2008). Capacity, change and performance: Study report (pp. 1-166). Maastricht: European Centre for Development Policy Management. Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2010). Developing capacity in fragile states. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 30(1), 66-78. Burnell, P; Randall, W (2017). Third World Issues: Politics in the Developing World, translated by Ahmad Saei and Saeed Mirtorabi, Tehran: ghomes [In Persian]. Call, C. T. (2008). The fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly, 29(8), 1491-1507. Chandy, L. (2011). Aiding stability: improving foreign assistance in fragile states. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Chua, A. (2004) World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability, New York, NY: Anchor Books. Collier P, Elliott L, Hegre H, Hoeffler A, Reynol-Querol A, Sambanis N. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Oxford University Press (for the World Bank): New York. Collier, P. (2008). The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, USA. DFID (Department for International Development). (2005). Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States. London: DFID. Donovan, N., Smart, M., Moreno-Torres, M., Ole Kiso, J., & Zachariah, G. (2005). Countries at risk of instability: risk factors and dynamics of instability. Background paper: Risk Factors of Instability, The Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office of the United Kingdom. Eade, D; Williams S. (1995). The Oxfam Handbook of Development and Relief. Oxfam: Oxford, UK. Ghani, A., & Lockhart, C. (2009). Fixing failed states: A framework for rebuilding a fractured world. Oxford University Press. Haims, M. C., Gompert, D. C., Stearns, B. K., & Treverton, G. F. (2008). Breaking the failed-state cycle (Vol. 204). Rand Corporation. Hemmati, M., Alavian, M., Karimi maleh., A (2020). Prebendal Government: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Political Corruption, Pizhuhesh Syasat Nazari, 12(27): 23-58. [In Persian]. Ikpe, E. (2007). Challenging the discourse on fragile states. Conflict, Security & Development, 7(1), 85-124. Jackson, R. H., & Rosberg, C. G. (1982). Why Africa's weak states persist: The empirical and the juridical in statehood. World politics, 35(1), 1-24. Karamzadi, M (2020). Evolution of peacebuilding approaches in fragile post-war states, Second National Conference on Humanities and Development: Shiraz. [In Persian]. Niakooee, S.M., Pirmohammadi, S. (2020). Iraq’s Fragile State and Intervention of Regional and Trans-Regional Powers (2011-2018). Iranian Research Letter of International Politics, 8(1): 191-216. [In Persian]. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2013). Ensuring Fragile States Are Not Left Behind. Factsheet on Resource Flows and Trends 2013. Paris: OECD. PDF. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2011). International Engagement in Fragile States: Can’t We Do Better? Conflict and Fragility. Paris: OECD Publishing. Osaghae, E. E. (2007). Fragile states. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 691-699. Patrick, S. (2011). Weak links: fragile states, global threats, and international security. Oxford University Press. Stiglitz, J.E. (2003) Globalization and its Discontents, New York, NY: WW Norton. Torres, M. M., & Anderson, M. (2004). Fragile states: defining difficult environments for poverty reduction. Department for International Development (DFID), United Kingdom. Vahedi, M (2020). Capacity Building, Encyclopedia of Scientific and Applied Education, Online Publishing, Available at: https://tetpedia.ihcs.ac.ir/article_6185_4818978a91c8391ae59fbb7f2252255e.pdf. [In Persian]. World Bank (2006) Engaging with Fragile States: An IEG Report of World Bank Support to Low Income Countries under Stress, Washington, DC: World Bank. Yazdanfam, M (2010). Fragile States and Human Security. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 12 (46): 5-36. [In Persian]. Zoellick, R. B. (2008). Fragile states: securing development. Survival, 50(6), 67-84. | ||
|
Statistics Article View: 339 PDF Download: 541 |
||