- برچیل، اسکات؛ لینکلیتر، اندرو، (1391)، نظریههای روابط بینالملل، ترجمه حمیرا مشیرزاده و روحاله طالبیآرانی، تهران: نشر میزان.
- بوزان، باری؛ آکاریا، آمیتاو، (1390)، نظریههای غیرغربی روابط بینالملل: دیدگاههاییدرباره آسیا و فراسویآن، ترجمه علیرضا طیب، چاپ اول، تهران: انتشارات موسسه ابرار معاصر تهران.
- صادقی، سجاد، (1401)، «نقش ایالات متحده امریکا در روند تکوین نظریهپردازی روابط بینالملل: بررسی نظام ارزشی-هنجاری و مطالعه موردی فردگرایی»، فصلنامه دانش تفسیر سیاسی، سال چهارم، شماره 13، صص 56-93.
- صادقی، سجاد؛ کیوانحسینی، سیداصغر، (1401)، «امریکا و نظریهپردازی روابط بینالملل: برداشتی انتقادی از مولفههای نظام هنجاری، سیاست قدرت و تولید علم»، فصلنامه سیاست جهانی، آذرماه، دوره 11، شماره 3، شماره پیاپی41، صص 213-239.
- مشیرزاده، حمیرا، (۱۳۹۰)، «تحولات جدید نظری در روابط بینالملل: زمینه مناسب برای نظریهپردازی بومی»، پژوهشنامه علوم سیاسی، سال ششم، شماره دوم، صص 165-201.
References
- Acharya, Amitva, (2011), “Dialogue and Discovery: In Search of International Relations Theories beyond the West”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 619-637.
- Acharya, Amitva, (2017), “Toward a Global International Relations?”, E-International Relations, Vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 1-5.
- Alejandro, Audrey, (2018), Western Dominance in International Relations? The Internationalization of IR in Brazil and India, London: Routledge.
- Buzan, Barry & Acharya, Amitav, (2017), “Why is There no Non-Western International Relations Theory? Ten Years on”, In International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 341-370.
- Cohen, Benjamin J, (2017), International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. London: Routledge.
- Crawford, Robert M.A & Jarvis, Darryl SL, (2001), International Relations still an American Social Science? Toward Diversity in International Thought, NewYork: Sunny Press.
- Eriksson, John R & Norman, Ludving, (2011), “Political Utilization of Scholary Ideas: The Clash of Civilization VS Soft Power in US Foreign Policy”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, No. 01, pp. 417-436.
- Friedrichs, Jorg, (2004), European Approaches to International Relations Theory: A House with Many Mansions, London: Routledge.
- Gofas, Andres&Hamati, Ataya& Onuf, Nicholas, (2018), History, Philosophy and Sociology of International Relations, London & NewYork: SAGE.
- Grosser, Alfred, (1956), “Letude des relations internationals, Specialite americaine?”, Revue francaise de science politique, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 634-651.
- Harding, Sandra, (1998), Is Science Multicultural? Post Colonialism, Feminism and Epistemologies, Bloomington Indiana University Press.
- Hoffmann, Stanley, (1977), “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus: Discoveries and Interpretations Studies in Contemporary Scholarship, Vol. 106, No. 3, pp 212-241.
- Holsti, KJ, (1985), The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory, London: Routledge.
- Ish-Shalom, Piki, (2009), “Theorizing Politics, Politicizing Theory and the Responsibility that Runs Between, In Perspectives on Politics”, Cambridge Universuty Press, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 303-316.
- Keohane, Robert O, (1984), After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton University Press.
- Keohane, Robert O, (2004), “Theory and International Institutions: Conversation With Robert O Keohane”, Institute of International Studies, University of Californial, Berkeley.
- Keohane, Robert O, (2020), “Understanding Multilateral Institutions in Easy and Hard Times”, Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 23, No.1, pp 1-18.
- Krippendorf, Ekkehart, (1987), “The Dominnce of American Approaches in International Relations”, Millennium, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 207-214.
- Kuru, Deniz, (2018), “Homegrown Theorizing: Knowledge, Scholar, Theory?”, All Azimuth: Widening the World of International Relations, pp. 59-80.
- Lake, David A, (2006), “American Hegemony and the Future of East-West Relations”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 23-30.
- Lazarus, Richard S & Folkman, Susan, (1984), Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, US:Springer Publishing Company.
- Linklater, Andrew, (1990), Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Luhmann, N. & Bednarz, John & Beacker, Dirk, (1996), Social Systems: Writing Science, Stanford University Press.
- McCourt, David M, (2020), American Power and International Theory at the Council on Foreign Relations: 1953-54, University of Michigan Press.
- Mearsheimer, John. J, (2005), “E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On”, International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp.139-152.
- Miliniak, Daniel& Long, James D& Peterson, Susan& Tierney, Micheal J, (2018), “The Global Study of International Relations: Hegemony, Diversity or Insularity”, Security Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 450-496.
- Neumann and O. Wæver, eds, (1997), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, London and New York: Routledge.
- Oatley, Thomas, (2019), International Political Economy, Sixth Edition, London: London: Routledge.
- Pandikttu, Kuruvilla, (2001), A Critical, Contextual and Creative Approach to Gandhi, in Gandhi: The Meaning of Mahatma for Millennium, Washington DC: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.
- Schmidt, Brian C, (2012), International Relations and the First Great Debate: New International Relations, London: Routldge.
- Smith, Steve, (1985), International Relations: British and American Perspectives, Oxford University Press.
- Snidal, Duncan, (1985), “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory”, International Organization, 39, No. 4, pp. 579-614.
- Subotic, Jelena & Steele, Brent J, (2018), “Moral Injury in International Relations”, Journal of Global Security Studies, Vol. 3 , No. 4, pp. 387-401.
- Tickner, Judith Ann, (2013), “Dealing with Difference: Problems and Possibilities for Dialogue in International Relations”, Millennium, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 607-618.
- Turton, Helen Louise, (2016), International Relations and American Dominance: A Diverse Discipline, London & NewYork: Routledge.
- Wæver, Ole, (1997), Figures of International Thought: Introducing Persons Instead of Paradigms, London & NewYork: Routledge.
- Wæver, Ole, (1998), “The Sociology of Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in IR”, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 682-727.
- Waltz, N.Kenneth, (1979), Theory of International Politics, Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
- Wohlforth, William C, (1999), “The Stability of a Unipolar World”, International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 5-41.
|
