مقایسه نتایج تحلیل سؤالات طیف لیکرت با نظریه کلاسیک آزمون و نظریه سؤال پاسخ

Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. H. (2004). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482276725

Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. For full text: http://ericae.net/irt/baker

Courville, T. G. (2004). An empirical comparison of item response theory and classical test theory item/person statistics. Texas A&M University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/dc9dbe1471e8f2828066045a2396ea24/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

De Ayala, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. Guilford Publications. https://cehs.unl.edu/EdPsych/RJSite/de_Ayala_Appendices_2ndEd.pdf

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, P. E. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269

Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). An NCME Instructional Module on Educational Measurement: issues and practice. Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory and Their Applications to Test Development, 12(3), 38-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00543.x

Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1985). Principles and applications of item response theory.

Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (2013). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-017-1988-9

Jeong, H. J., & Lee, W. C. (2016). Item response theory-based evaluation of psychometric properties of the safety attitudes questionnaire-Korean version (SAQ-K). Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 3(5), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2015.02.00020

Kang, S. M., & Waller, N. G. (2005). Moderated multiple regression, spurious interaction effects, and IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 29(2), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621604272737

Lord, F.M., Novick, M.R., & Birnbaum, A. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-35040-000

Ostini, R., & Nering, M. L. (2006). Polytomous item response theory models (No. 144). Sage. https://scholar.archive.org/work/dbmqoxx2jvf6bl3ze75bobgxdq/access/wayback/http://hbanaszak.mjr.uw.edu.pl/TempTxt/ebooksclub.org__Polytomous_Item_Response_Theory_Models__Quantitative_Applications_in_the_Social_Sciences_.pdf

Reeve, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005). Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire item and scale properties. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials: methods of practice, 2, 55-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198527695.003.0005

Sorrel, M. A., Olea, J., Abad, F. J., de la Torre, J., Aguado, D., & Lievens, F. (2016). Validity and reliability of situational judgement test scores: A new approach based on cognitive diagnosis models. Organizational Research Methods, 19(3), 506-532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116630065

Toland, M. D. (2014). Practical guide to conducting an item response theory analysis. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 34(1), 120-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431613511332

Taylor, C. S. (2013). Validity and validation. Oxford University Press, USA. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199791040.001.0001

Zamanpour, E., Younesi, J., Rastegar Agah, M., & Mehrabi, M. (2019). Attitudinal Analysis: The Difference Between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory. Communication Research, 26(2), 139-165. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22082/cr.2019.113772.1917