مفهوم دولت فوکوئی و مسئولیت حمایت در حقوق بین‌الملل معاصر

شهبازی، آرامش. (1388«الف»). حقوق بین‌الملل: دیالکتیک ارزش و واقعیت. تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش‌های حقوقی شهردانش.

شهبازی، آرامش. (1388«ب»). «تعامل سازمان‌های غیردولتی با سازمان جهانی تجارت». مجله پژوهش‌های حقوقی. 8 (15). 320-293.

نوابخش، مهرداد و فاروق کریمی. (1388). «واکاوی مفهوم قدرت در نظریات میشل فوکو». فصلنامه مطالعات سیاسی. 3 (1). 63-49.

ب) انگلیسی

A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility. (2004). Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (with endnotes). New York: United Nations.

Aalberts, Tanja E. & Ben Golder. (2012). “International Legal Theory, On the Uses of Foucault for International Law”. Leiden Journal of International Law. 25(3).

Coyle, Sean. (2007). From Positivism to Idealism: A Study of the Moral Dimensions of Legality. UK: Ashgate.

Craven, Matt. (2012). “On Foucault and Wolf or from Law to Political Economy”. Leiden Journal of International Law. 25(3).

Gordon, Colin (Ed). (1980). Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other writings. 1972-79. New York: Pantheon.

Koremenos, Barbara. (09/7/2014). [Institutionalism and International Law], Available at:  http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1919309.

Massingham, Eve. (2009). “Military intervention for humanitarian purposes: does the Responsibility to protect doctrine advance the legality of the use of force for humanitarian ends?” International Review of the Red Cross. 91(876).

Neal, Andrew W. (2009). “Rethinking Foucault in International Relations: Promiscuity and Unfaithfulness”. Global Society. 23(4).

Orford, Anne. (2012). “In Praise of Description”. Leiden Journal of International Law. 25(3).

Schneck, Stephen Frederick. (1987). “Michel Foucault on power/discourse, theory and practice”. Journal of Human Studies. 10(1).

The Responsibility to Protect. (2001). Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, Canada: The International Development Research Centre, United Nations.