| تعداد نشریات | 61 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 2,212 |
| تعداد مقالات | 18,011 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 55,477,689 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 28,954,322 |
ترکیب روشهای AHP و برنامه ریزی آرمانی صفر یا یک برای انتخاب یک سیستم پیشرفته ساخت و تولید | ||
| مطالعات مدیریت بهبود و تحول | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 20، شماره 63، دی 1389، صفحه 115-151 اصل مقاله (750.81 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| چکیده | ||
| فن آوری های پیشرفته نوظهور و به کارگیری آن ها در سازمان های تولیدی برای باقی ماندن در صحنه رقابت امری حیاتی به شمار می رود. از این رو انتخاب فن آوری پیشرفته، فرآیندی بسیار مهم برای سازمان های تولیدی به حساب می آید. در واقع تصمیم گیری برای انتخاب فن آوری به واسطه تاثیری که بر روی فعالی تهای آینده یک سازمان می گذارد تصمیم گیری استراتژیک محسوب می گردد و لذا از پیچیدگی های فرآیندی خاص خود برخوردار است. پیچیدگی این فرآیند نه تنها به خاطر عوامل تاثیرگذار مختلف کمی و کیفی آنهاست بلکه متعارض بودن این عوامل با یکدیگر و ه مچنین وجود دیدگاه های متفاوت ذی نفعان است. به منظور انتخاب نوع خاصی از فن آوری لازم است ه مچنان که عوامل دخیل در انتخاب سبک سنگین می شوند دیدگا ههای ذی نفعان مختلف در مسئله منظور گردد. علاوه بر آن باید با توجه به منابع موجود بهترین انتخاب از سوی مدیریت انجام شود. روش های متعددی برای ارزیابی و انتخاب فن آوری تا کنون گسترش یافته اند که هر یک مزایا و معایب مخصوص به خود دارند. به عنوان مثال می توان به زمان بر بودن و صرف نظر کردن از عوامل کیفی در بسیاری از روش ها اشاره کرد. در این مقاله به ترکیب دو روش AHP و برنامه ریزی آرمانی صفر یا یک پرداخته می شود که می تواند ضمن در نظر گرفتن دیدگاه های ذی نفعان، ارزیابی فن آوری را با توجه به عوامل متعارض با یکدیگر انجام دهد. روش مزبور برای یک انتخاب یک سیستم پیشرفته ساخت و تولید به کار گرفته می شود تا ضمن نمایش کاربردی بودن روش مزبور، نشان داده شود که روش ترکیبی می تواند اطلاعات کلیدی بیشتری نسبت به سایر روشهای موجود در ارزیابی فن آوری برای مدیریت فراهم آورد | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| ارزیابی فن آوری؛ عوامل کیفی و کمی؛ محدویت منابع برنامه ریزی آرمانی صفر یا یک؛ سیستم پیشرفته ساخت و تولید | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
1. Akimoto, K., Tomoda, T., and Fujii, Y. (2005). "Development of a mixed integer programming model for technology development strategy and its application to IGCC technologies", Energy, Vol. 30, No. 7, 1176- 1191. 2. Almannai, B., and Greenough, R.J. (2008). "A decision support tool based on QFD and FMEA for the selection of manufacturing automation technologies", Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 24, 501–507. 3. Ayres, R.U. (1992). "CIM: a challenge to technology management", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 7, No 1-3, 17- 39. 4. Badri, M.A. (1999). "Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem", International Journal of Production Economics, 62: 237-248. 5. Badri, M.A. (2001). "A combined AHP-GP model for quality control systems", International Journal of Production Economics, 72, 27-40. 6. Badiru, A.B. (1990). "A management guide to automation cost justification", Journal of Industrial. Eng, Vol. 22, No 2, 27-30. 7. Badiru, A.B., Foote, B.L., and Chetupuzha, J. (1991). "A multi-attribute spreadsheet model for manufacturing technology justification", Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 21, No 1-4, 29-33. 8. Bantel, K.A. (1998). "Technology-based, ‘‘adolescent’’ firm configurations: strategy identification, context, and performance", Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 13, No 3, 205–230. 9. Bond, E.U., and Houston, M.B. (2003). "Barriers to matching new technologies and market opportunities in established firms", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 20, No 2, 120–135. 10. Boyer, K.K., Ward, P., and Leong, G.K. (1996). "Approaches to the factory of the future: An empirical taxonomy", Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, No 4, 297-314. 11. Breiner, S., Cuhls, G., and Grupp, H. (1994). "Technology foresight using a Delphi approach: a Japanese-German co-operation", R & D Management, Vol. 24, No 2, 141-153. 12. Buyurgan, N. and Saygin, C. (2008). "Application of the analytical hierarchy process for real-time scheduling and part routing in advanced manufacturing systems", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 27, 101-110. 13. Canada, J. R. (1986). "Non-traditional method for evaluating CIM opportunities assign weights to intangibles", Journal of Industrial Engineering., Vol. 18, No 3, 66-71. 14. Capon, N., and Glazer, R. (1991). "Marketing and technology: a strategic co alignment", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51, No 3, 1–14. 15. Chambers, M. R. (1991). "Planning for technological substitution and change", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 25, 191- 200. 16. Chang, T.H., and Wang, T.C. (2009). "Measuring the success possibility of implementing advanced manufacturing technology by utilizing the consistent fuzzy preference relations", Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 36, 4313–4320 17. Chen, L.C., and Lin, L. (2002). "Optimization of product configuration design using functional requirements and constraints", Research in engineering design, Vol. 13, 167-182. 18. Chuu, S.J. (2009). "Group decision-making model using fuzzy multiple attributes analysis for the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol, 160, 586-602. 19. Coates, J.F. (1995). "How to recognise a sound technology forecast", Research Technology Management, Vol. 38, No 5. 11-12. 20. Crawford, M., and Benedetto, A.D. (2008). "New products management", McGraw-Hill, Singapore. 21. Daily, C.A., McDougall, P.P., Covin, J.G., and Dalton, D.R. (2002). "Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms", Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No 3, 387–412. 22. Da Silveria, G. (2005). "Market priorities, manufacturing configuration, and business performance: An empirical analysis of the order-winners framework", Journal of Operation Management, Vol. 23, 662-675. 23. DeRuntz, B., and Turner, R. (2003). "Organizational considerations for advanced manufacturing technologies", The Journal of Technology Studies, Vol. 29, No 3. 24. Falkner, H.C., and Benhajila, S. (1990). "Multi-attribute decision models in the justification of CIM systems", The Engineering. Economist, Vol. 35, No 2, 91-114. 25. Forman, E.H and Gass, S.I. (2001). "The analytic hierarchy process-an exposition", Operations Research, Vol. 49, No 4, 469-486. 26. Gagnon, R.J., and Haldar, S. (1997). "Assessing advanced engineering technologies", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 14, No 2/3/4, 439-469. 27. Galotti, K.M. (2002). "Making decisions that matter", Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey. 28. Green, G. (2000). "Towards integrated evaluation: validation of models", Journal of engineering design, Vol. 11(2), 121-132. 29. Hellstrom, T. (2003). "Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation", Technologic Science, Vol. 25, 369–384. 30. Henrikson, A.D.P. (1997). "A technology assessment primer for management of technology", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 13, No 5/6, 615-638. 31. Henrikson, A.D.P., and Booth, S.R. (1995). "Evaluating the costeffectiveness of new environmental technologies", Remediation, Vol. 5, No 1, 7-24. 32. Hilbrink, J.O. (1989). "Economic impact and technical change", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 36, No 1, 37-46. 33. Hilier, F.S., and Liberman, G.J. (2007). "Introduction to operations research", McGraw-Hill, Singapore. 34. Hofmann, C., and Orr, S. (2005). "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption-the German experience", Technovation, Vol. 25, 711–724. 35. Humphreys, K.K. (1983). "Jelen’s cost and optimisation engineering (3rd edition)", McGraw-Hill, New York. 36. Hsuan, M.J. (2001). "Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management", Technovation, Vol. 21, No 7, 423–435. 17. Chen, L.C., and Lin, L. (2002). "Optimization of product configuration design using functional requirements and constraints", Research in engineering design, Vol. 13, 167-182. 18. Chuu, S.J. (2009). "Group decision-making model using fuzzy multiple attributes analysis for the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology", Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol, 160, 586-602. 19. Coates, J.F. (1995). "How to recognise a sound technology forecast", Research Technology Management, Vol. 38, No 5. 11-12. 20. Crawford, M., and Benedetto, A.D. (2008). "New products management", McGraw-Hill, Singapore. 21. Daily, C.A., McDougall, P.P., Covin, J.G., and Dalton, D.R. (2002). "Governance and strategic leadership in entrepreneurial firms", Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No 3, 387–412. 22. Da Silveria, G. (2005). "Market priorities, manufacturing configuration, and business performance: An empirical analysis of the order-winners framework", Journal of Operation Management, Vol. 23, 662-675. 23. DeRuntz, B., and Turner, R. (2003). "Organizational considerations for advanced manufacturing technologies", The Journal of Technology Studies, Vol. 29, No 3. 24. Falkner, H.C., and Benhajila, S. (1990). "Multi-attribute decision models in the justification of CIM systems", The Engineering. Economist, Vol. 35, No 2, 91-114. 25. Forman, E.H and Gass, S.I. (2001). "The analytic hierarchy process-an exposition", Operations Research, Vol. 49, No 4, 469-486. 26. Gagnon, R.J., and Haldar, S. (1997). "Assessing advanced engineering technologies", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 14, No 2/3/4, 439-469. 27. Galotti, K.M. (2002). "Making decisions that matter", Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey. 28. Green, G. (2000). "Towards integrated evaluation: validation of models", Journal of engineering design, Vol. 11(2), 121-132. 29. Hellstrom, T. (2003). "Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation", Technologic Science, Vol. 25, 369–384. 30. Henrikson, A.D.P. (1997). "A technology assessment primer for management of technology", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 13, No 5/6, 615-638. 31. Henrikson, A.D.P., and Booth, S.R. (1995). "Evaluating the costeffectiveness of new environmental technologies", Remediation, Vol. 5, No 1, 7-24. 32. Hilbrink, J.O. (1989). "Economic impact and technical change", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 36, No 1, 37-46. 33. Hilier, F.S., and Liberman, G.J. (2007). "Introduction to operations research", McGraw-Hill, Singapore. 34. Hofmann, C., and Orr, S. (2005). "Advanced manufacturing technology adoption-the German experience", Technovation, Vol. 25, 711–724. 35. Humphreys, K.K. (1983). "Jelen’s cost and optimisation engineering (3rd edition)", McGraw-Hill, New York. 36. Hsuan, M.J. (2001). "Portfolio management of R&D projects: implications for innovation management", Technovation, Vol. 21, No 7, 423–435. Jo, H., and Lee, J. (1996). "The relationship between an entrepreneur’s background and performance in a new venture', Technovation, Vol. 16, No 4, 161–171. 38. Khatami Firouzabadi, S.M.A., and Henson, B.W. (2004), "An aggregation method for multiple stakeholders’ in design selection decisions", Proceedings of the second international conference on manufacturing research, Sheffield. 39. Khatami Firouzabadi, S.M.A., Henson, B., and Barnes, C. (2008). "A multiple stakeholders’ approach to strategic selection decisions", International Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering, Vol. 58 (4), 851-865. 40. Kim, S.H., Crick, T., and Kim, S.H. (1986). "Do executives practice what academics preach?" Management Accounting, Vol. 67, 49-52. 41. Klepper, S., and Simons, K.L. (2000). "The making of an oligopoly: firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the US tire industry", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 108, No 4, 728–760. 42. Kolli, S., and Parsaei, H.R. (1992). "Multi-criteria analysis in the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology using PROMETHEE", Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering., Vol. 23, No 1-4, 455-458. 43. Krinsky, I., and Miltenburg, J. (1991). "Alternate method for the justification of advanced manufacturing technologies", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, 997-1015. 44. Linstone, H.A., and Turoff, M. (1975). "The Delphi multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs", John Wiley & Sons, New York. 45. Lovatt, A.M., and Shercliff, H.R. (1998). "Manufacturing process selection in engineering design, Part 2: an approach for creating taskbased process selection procedures", Journal of material and design, 19, 217-230. 46. Martino, J.P. (1993). "Technological forecasting for decision-making (3rd edition)", McGraw-Hill, New York. 47. McGrath, R.G., and MacMillan, I.C. (2000). "Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning", Technological Management, 35- 49. 48. Meredith, J.R., and Suresh, N.C. (1986). "Justification techniques for advanced manufacturing technologies", International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 24, No 5, 1043-1057. 49. Meyer, W. (1992). "Value analysis for AI applications in CIM environments", IEEE International Workshop on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 469-475. 50. Nagalingam, S.V., and Lin, G.C.I. (1997). "A unified approach towards CIM justification", Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 10, No 2, 133-145. 51. Nelson, C.A. (1986). "A scoring model for flexible manufacturing systems project selection", European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 24, 346-359. 52. Noble, J.L. (1990). "A new approach for justifying computer-integrated manufacturing", Journal of Cost Management for the manufacturing Industry, Vol. 3, No 4, 14-19. 53. Noori, H. (1995)."The design of an integrated group decision support system for technology assessment", R&D Management, Vol. 25, 309- 322. 54. Ordoobadi, S.M, and Mulvaney, N.J. (2001). "Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies-value analysis", Journal of Engineering Tchnology Management, Vol. 18, 157–184. 55. Olson, D. (1995). "Decision aids for selection problems", Springer- Verlag Book Company, New York. 56. Percival, J.C., and Cozzarin, B.P. (2010). "Complementarities in the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologes", Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 21, (2010), 122-135. 57. Perry, S.C. (2001). "The relationship between written business plans and the failure of small businesses in the US", Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 39, No 3, 201–208. 58. Petty, J.W., and Bowlin, O.D. (1976). "The financial manager and quantitative decision models", Financial Management, Vol. 4, No 4, 32-41. 59. Pike, R., Sharp, J., and Price, D. "AMT investment in the larger UK firm", International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 9, No 2, (1989), 149-161. 60. Prabhu, T.R., and Vizayakumar, K. (2001). "Technology choice using FHDM - a case of iron-making technology", IEEE Transactions and Engineering Management, Vol. 48, No. 2, 209–222. 61. Prasad, A.V.S., and Somasekhara, N. (1990). "The analytic hierarchy process for choice of technologies", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 38, 151-158. 62. Ramasesh, R.V., and Jayakumar, M.D. (1993). "Economic justification of advanced manufacturing technology", OMEGA, International Journal of Management Science, Vol. 21, No 3, 289-306. 63. Rappa, M.A. (1994). "Assessing the rate of technological progress using hazard rate models of R & D communities", R & D Management, Vol. 24, No 2, 183-194. 64. Rardin, R.L. (1998). "Optimisation in operations research", Prentice- Hall International, UK. 65. Read, M. J., and Gear, A.E. (1994). "Teamworking to develop technology strategy", International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 9, No 2, 242-251. 66. Rias, J., and Van, W. (2010). "Technology assessment for portfolio managers", Journal of technovation Vo. 30, No 4, 223-228. 67. Rosenkranz, S. (2003). "Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety", Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 50, No 2, 183– 201. 68. Schniederjans, M.J and Garvin, T. (1997). "Using the analytic hierarchy process and multi-objective programming for the selection of cost drivers in activity-based costing", European Journal of Operation Research, Vol. 100, 72-80. 69. Schniederjans, M.J., and Wilson, R.L., (1991). "Using the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for information system project selection". Information and Management, 20, 333-342. 70. Shepherd, D.A., Douglas, E.J., and Shanley, M. (2000). "New venture survival", Business Venturing, Vol. 15, No 5, 393–410. 71. Sohn, S.Y., and Ahn, B.J. (2003). "Multi-generation diffusion model for economic assessment of new technology", Forecasting of Social Change, Vol. 70, 251–264. 72. Swink, M., and Nair, A. (2007). "Capturing the competitive advantages of advanced manufacturing technologies: Design-manufacturing integration as a complementary set", Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 25, No 3, 736-754. 73. Theodorou, P., and Florou, G. (2008). "Manufacturing strategies and financial performance-The effect of advanced information technology: CAD / CAM systems", OMEGA, Vol. 36, 107-121. 74. Tichy, G. "The over-optimism among experts in assessment and foresight", Forecast. Soc. Change, Vol. 71, (2004), 341–363. 75. Tran T.A., and Diam. T. (2008). "A taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessment", Technological Forecasting & Social Change, Vol. 75, 1396–405. 76. Ulvila, J.W. (1987). "Postal automation (ZIP + 4) technology: a decision analysis", Interfaces, Vol. 17, No 2, 1-12. 77. von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W., (1986). "Decision analysis and behavioral research", Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 78. Wilhite, A., and Lord, R. (2006). "Estimating the risk of technology development", Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 18, No 3, 3–10. 79. Zaidman, B. and Cevidalli, G. (1987). "Project evaluation: externalities must not be disregarded", R & D Management. Vol. 17, No 4, 269-276. 80. Zhou, H., Leong, G.K., Jonsson, P., and Sum, C.C. (2009). "A comparative of advanced manufacturing technology and manufacturing infrastructure investments in Singapore and Sweden", International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 120, 42-53 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,575 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 830 |
||