دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات62
تعداد شماره‌ها2,323
تعداد مقالات19,157
تعداد مشاهده مقاله61,589,798
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله31,232,762
روحی, ایرج, پیشدار, مهسا, حسنی کرده ده, مریم. (1404). رتبه ‌بندی استراتژی ‌های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شهودی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(79), 87-122. doi: 10.22054/jims.2025.89026.2995
ایرج روحی; مهسا پیشدار; مریم حسنی کرده ده. "رتبه ‌بندی استراتژی ‌های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شهودی". سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23, 79, 1404, 87-122. doi: 10.22054/jims.2025.89026.2995
روحی, ایرج, پیشدار, مهسا, حسنی کرده ده, مریم. (1404). 'رتبه ‌بندی استراتژی ‌های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شهودی', سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 23(79), pp. 87-122. doi: 10.22054/jims.2025.89026.2995
روحی, ایرج, پیشدار, مهسا, حسنی کرده ده, مریم. رتبه ‌بندی استراتژی ‌های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شهودی. سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی, 1404; 23(79): 87-122. doi: 10.22054/jims.2025.89026.2995

رتبه ‌بندی استراتژی ‌های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی با رویکرد تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره فازی شهودی

مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی
مقاله 3، دوره 23، شماره 79، دی 1404، صفحه 87-122    اصل مقاله (1.9 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22054/jims.2025.89026.2995
نویسندگان
ایرج روحی1؛ مهسا پیشدار* 2؛ مریم حسنی کرده ده3
1دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت صنعتی گرایش تحقیق در عملیات، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی دانشگاه تهران، شهر تهران، ایران.
2استادیار مدیریت و فناوری، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، شهر تهران، ایران.
3دانشجوی دکتری، مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشکدگان فارابی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به نگرانی‌ های جهانی پیرامون ضایعات غذایی و تغییرات اقلیمی، به‌ یافت مواد غذایی به ‌عنوان راهبردی کلیدی برای دستیابی به اقتصاد چرخه‌ ای و توسعه پایدار مطرح است. این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی و رتبه ‌بندی راهبرد های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی از دیدگاه‌ های زیست ‌محیطی، اقتصادی، اجتماعی و فنی انجام شد. ده راهبرد اصلی از ادبیات موضوع استخراج و بر اساس دوازده شاخص کلیدی توسط ده خبره با سابقه در صنعت غذا ارزیابی گردید. نوآوری این پژوهش، ارائه چارچوبی تلفیقی متشکل از مجموعه ‌های فازی شهودی دایره‌ای (C-IFS)، روش عینی MEREC جهت وزن‌ دهی و روش MARCOS برای رتبه ‌بندی است. به طوری که شکاف موجود در ادبیات پیرامون فقدان یک مدل یکپارچه برای ارزیابی راهبرد های به‌یافت ضایعات غذایی را پر می‌نماید. یافته‌ ها نشان داد که شاخص ‌های «پتانسیل بازار»، «آگاهی عمومی از محصولات به‌یافت ‌شده» و «کیفیت و ایمنی غذایی» بیشترین وزن را دارند که بر اهمیت پاسخگویی به بازار، ایمنی و آموزش عمومی تأکید دارد. در رتبه‌ بندی نهایی، تولید منسوجات پایدار از ضایعات غذایی رتبه نخست را به خود اختصاص داد و پس از آن به ‌ترتیب بسته ‌بندی پایدار، تولید مواد غذایی جدید از ضایعات و تولید انرژی زیستی قرار گرفتند. راهبرد های موفق با بستن چرخه منابع، خلق ارزش اقتصادی و پیشبرد اهداف توسعه پایدار همراه هستند. چارچوب پیشنهادی می‌تواند ابزاری کارآمد برای سیاست‌گذاران، پژوهشگران و فعالان صنعت در انتخاب راهبرد های بهینه به‌یافت باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
اقتصاد چرخه ای؛ به یافت ضایعات مواد غذایی؛ مجموعه فازی شهودی دایره‌ای؛ MEREC؛ MARCOS
مراجع
  1. Alkan,M., Kahraman, C. (2021). Circular intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method with vague membership functions: Supplier selection application context. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets27(1):24-52.DOI:7546/nifs.2021.27.1.24-52.
  2. Aghajani Mir, M., Taherei Ghazvinei, P., Sulaiman, N. M. N., Basri, N. E. A., Saheri, S., Mahmood, N. Z., Jahan, A., Begum, R. A., & Aghamohammadi, N. (2016). Application of TOPSIS and VIKOR improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. Journal of Environmental Management, 166, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.028.
  3. Abdulaal, R. M., Makki, A. A., & Al-Filali, I. Y. (2023). A novel hybrid approach for prioritizing investment initiatives to achieve financial sustainability in higher education institutions using MEREC-G and RATMI. Sustainability, 15(16), 12635. DOI: 10.3390/su151612635.
  4. Albizzati, P. F., Tonini, D., & Astrup, T. F. (2021). A Quantitative Sustainability Assessment of Food Waste Management in the European Union. Environmental Science and Technology, 55(23), 16099-16109. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03940.
  5. Abdelaal, R.M., Makki, A.A., Al-Madi, E.M., Qhadi, A.M. (2024). Prioritizing Strategic Objectives and Projects in Higher Education Institutions: A New Hybrid Fuzzy MEREC-G-TOPSIS Approach. IEEE Access, 12, 89735-89753. DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3419701.
  6. Atanassov, K.T. (1986) Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96.
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.
  7. Ardra, S., & Barua, M. K. (2022). Halving food waste generation by 2030: The challenges and strategies of monitoring UN sustainable development goal target 12.3. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 135042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135042.
  8. Alimohammadlou, M., Alinejad, S., Khoshsepehr, Z., Safari, M., Jafari, Y., Tajodin, A., & Mohammadi, S. S. (2023). Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy AHP: An Application in Manufacturing Sector. In Analytic Hierarchy Process with Fuzzy Sets Extensions: Applications and Discussions(pp. 369-394). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39438-6_17.
  9. Atanassov, K., & Marinov, E. (2021). Four distances for circular intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Mathematics, 9(10), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9101121.
  10. Alshahrani, R., Yenugula, M., Algethami, H., Alharbi, F., Goswami, S. S., Naveed, Q. N., Lasisi, A., Islam, S., Khan, N. A., & Zahmatkesh, S. (2024). Establishing the fuzzy integrated hybrid MCDM framework to identify the key barriers to implementing artificial intelligence-enabled sustainable cloud system in an IT industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 238(Part C), Article 121732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121732.
  11. Bozyiğit, M. C., & Ünver, M. (2024). Parametric circular intuitionistic fuzzy information measures and multi-criteria decision making with extended TOPSIS. Granular Computing, 9(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-024-00469-3.
  12. Batool, F., Kurniawan, T. A., Mohyuddin, A., Othman, M. H. D., Aziz, F., Al-Hazmi, H. E., ... & Anouzla, A. (2024). Environmental impacts of food waste management technologies: A critical review of life cycle assessment (LCA) studies. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Volume 143, 104287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104287.
  13. Bhatia, S. K., Patel, A. K., & Yang, Y. H. (2024). The green revolution of food waste upcycling to produce polyhydroxyalkanoates. Trends in Biotechnology. 1273-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2024.03.002.
  14. Bello, O. S., Orodepo, G. O., Olakunle, M. O., Agboola, O. S., Inyinbor, A. A., & Agegoke, K. A. (2024). Socioeconomic concern, environmental impact assessment and feasibility study of up-cycled food waste. Food Waste Valorization, 47-64. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-443-15958-9.00005-8.
  15. Buyuk, A. M., & Temur, G. T. (2020, July). A framework for selection of the best food waste management alternative by a spherical fuzzy AHP based approach. In International conference on intelligent and fuzzy systems(pp. 151-159). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51156-2_19
  16. Bangar, S. P., Chaudhary, V., Kajla, P., Balakrishnan, G., & Phimolsiripol, Y. (2024). Strategies for upcycling food waste in the food production and supply chain. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Vol. 143, 104314 ref. 105. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104314.
  17. Caicedo-Paz, A.V., Hucke, H., Tropea, A., Mondello, L. (2025). Win-win upcycling strategy for red araç´a fruit waste: Process intensification and application of food-grade cyanidin-rich antioxidants. Future Foods 11 (2025) 100535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100535
  18. Csordas, A. (2024). Foodtech for the Circular Economy. Foresight and STI Governance. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.2.58.68.
  19. Censi, R., Campana, P., Tarola, A. M., & Ruggieri, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and digital twins for sustainable waste management: A bibliometric and thematic review. Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 21, 15(11), 6337. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116337.
  20. Çakır, E., & Taş, M.A. (2023). Circular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Making and Its Application. Expert Syst. Appl., 225, 120076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120076.
  21. Carnaval, L. D. S., Jaiswal, A. K., & Jaiswal, S. (2024). Agro-Food Waste Valorization for Sustainable Bio-Based Packaging. Journal of Composites Science, 8(2), 41. DOI: 10.3390/polym13010134.
  22. Dou, Z., Dierenfeld, E. S., Wang, X., Chen, X., & Shurson, G. C. (2024). A critical analysis of challenges and opportunities for upcycling food waste to animal feed to reduce climate and resource burdens. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Volume 203, 107418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107418.
  23. Ecer, F., & Pamučar, D. (2021). MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services. Applied Soft Computing, 104, 107199 - 107199. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107199.
  24. Ejegwa, P. A., Anum, M. T., & Isife, K. I. (2024). A new method of distance measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in admission procedure. Journal of uncertain systems, 17(02), 2440005. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1752890924400051.
  25. (2024). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2024: Food stocktaking at mid-point on the road to 2030. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 50-54. https://doi.org/10.4060/cd1254en.
  26. Manzoor, S.,Fayaz, U., Hussain Dar, A., Kumar Dash, K., Shams, R., Bashir, I., Kumar Pandey, V., Abdi, A. (2024). Future Foods. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100362. Journal volume 9,p. 100362.
  27. Garg, H., Ünver, M., Olgun, M., & Türkarslan, E. (2023). An extended EDAS method with circular intuitionistic fuzzy value features and its application to multi-criteria decision-making process. Artificial intelligence review, 56, 3173 – 320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10601-5.
  28. Guillard, V., Gaucel, S., Fornaciari, C., Angellier-Coussy, H., Buche, P., & Gontard, N. (2018). The next generation of sustainable food packaging to preserve our environment in a circular economy context. Frontiers in nutrition, 5, 121. DOI: 10.3390/polym13010134.
  29. Garcia‐Gonzalez, L., Bijttebier, S., Voorspoels, S., Uyttebroek, M., Elst, K., Dejonghe, W., & De Wever, H. (2015). Cascaded valorization of food waste using bioconversions as core processes. Advances in food biotechnology, 427.
  30. Galanakis, C. M., Cvejic, J., Verardo, V., & Segura-Carretero, A. (2022). Food use for social innovation by optimizing food waste recovery strategies. In Innovation strategies in the food industry(pp. 209-227). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85203-6.00016-5.
  31. Gong, C., Jiang, L., & Hou, L. (2022). Group decision-making with distance induced fuzzy operators. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 24(1), 440-456.‏
  32. Gedvilaitė, D., Lapinskienė, G., & Szarucki, M. (2024). Assessment of the development of the circular economy in the EU countries: Comparative analysis by multiple criteria methods. European Scientific Journal, 2024(8), 13. https://doi.org/10.28991/esj-2024-08-02-013
  33. Gurmani, S. H., Ding, W., Zulqarnain, R. M., & Hao, J. (2025). Cubic linguistic T-spherical fuzzy aggregation operator-based multi-attribute group decision-making model and its application to food waste treatment technique selection. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 161, 112111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.112111
  34. Haq, R.S., Saeed, M., Mateen, N., Siddiqui, F., Naqvi, M., Yi, J., & Ahmed, S. (2022). Sustainable material selection with crisp and ambiguous data using single-valued neutrosophic-MEREC-MARCOS framework. Appl. Soft Comput., 128, 109546. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109546.
  35. Jovanovic, S., Savic, S., Jovicic, N., Boskovic, G., & Djordjevic, Z. (2016). Using multi-criteria decision making for selection of the optimal strategy for municipal solid waste management. Waste Management & Research, 34(9), 884–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x16654753.
  36. Jeevahan, J., Anderson, A., Sriram, V., Durairaj, R. B., Britto Joseph, G., & Mageshwaran, G. (2021). Waste into energy conversion technologies and conversion of food wastes into the potential products: a review. International Journal of Ambient Energy, 42(9), 1083-1101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01430750.2018.1537939
  37. Kanwal, N., Zhang, M., Zeb, M., Batool, U., & Rui, L. (2024). From plate to palate: Sustainable solutions for upcycling food waste in restaurants and catering. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 104687. DOI:10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104687.
  38. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of Objective Weights Using a New Method Based on the Removal Effects of Criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13040525
  39. Keshtpour,A., Shadkam, E., Beheshti, H. K. (2023). Proposing a novel integrated OPA-MARCOS multi-criteria decision making model to choose the best plastic recycling method (case study). International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 26(4), 449–474. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmor.2023.135542.
  40. Kamber, E., & Baskak, M. (2024). Green logistics park location selection with circular intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method: The case of Istanbul. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 46(2), 4173-4189. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-231843.
  41. Khan, M. R., Pervaiz, F., Raza, A., Latif, A., & Shang, Y. (2025). A decision support system for assessment of digital marketing platform selection using novel circular intuitionistic fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators. jirmcs. https://doi.org/10.62270/jirmcs.v4i1.48
  42. Kurniawan, T. A., Meidiana, C., Goh, H. H., Zhang, D., Othman, M. H. D., Aziz, F., Anouzla, A., Sarangi, P. K., Pasaribu, B., & Ali, I. (2024). Unlocking synergies between waste management and climate change mitigation to accelerate decarbonization through circular-economy digitalization in Indonesia. Sustainable Production and Consumption,46,431–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.01
  43. Lu, P., Parrella, J. A., Xu, Z., & Kogut, A. (2024). A scoping review of the literature examining consumer acceptance of upcycled foods. Food Quality and Preference, 114, 105098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.105098.
  44. Magalhães, V. S., Ferreira, L. M. D., & Silva, C. (2022). Prioritising food loss and waste mitigation strategies in the fruit and vegetable supply chain: A multi-criteria approach. Sustainable Production and Consumption Volume 31, Pages 569-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.03.022.
  45. Mirosa, M., & Bremer, P. (2023). Understanding new foods: Upcycling. In Sustainable Food Innovation (pp. 147-156). Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12358-0_11.
  46. Mastilo, Z., Štilić, A., Gligović, D., Puška, A., 2024, Assessing the Banking Sector of Bosnia and Herzegovina: An Analysis of Financial Indicators through the MEREC and MARCOS Methods, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2024
  47. Mirabella, N., Castellani, V., & Sala, S. (2014). Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 28-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.051.
  48. Makki, A. A., & Abdulaal, R. M. (2023). A hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy MEREC-G and Fuzzy RATMI. Mathematics, 11(17), 3773. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11173773.
  49. Manfredi, S., & Cristobal, J. (2016). Towards more sustainable management of European food waste: Methodological approach and numerical application. Waste Management & Research, 34(9), 957-968. 10.1177/0734242X16652965
  50. Nutrizio, M., Dukić, J., Sabljak, I., Samardžija, A., Fučkar, V. B., Djekić, I., & Jambrak, A. R. (2024). Upcycling of food by-products and waste: nonthermal green extractions and life cycle assessment approach. Sustainability, 16(21), 9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219143.
  51. Oddershede, A., Quezada, L., Palominos, P., & Reitter, F. (2023). A multicriteria DM framework in the eco-management of operations: a case of organic waste reuse. Procedia Computer Science, 221, 726–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.08.044
  52. Plazzotta, S., & Manzocco, L. (2019). Food waste valorization. In Saving Food (pp. 279- 313). Academic Press. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-815357-4.00010-9.
  53. Pereira, c.p.,  Bassin, I,D.,  Bassin, J.P.(2025). Bioreactor Technologies for Biogas Generation from Food Waste. In book: Resource Recycling and Management of Food Waste (pp.383-397). DOI:1007/978-3-031-86688-3_17.
  54. Periyavaram, S.R.,  Bella ,K., Lavakumar ,U.,  P Hari Prasad, R.(2023). Hydrothermal carbonization of food waste: Process parameters optimization and biomethane potential evaluation of process water. J Environ Manage. Dec 1:347:119132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119132.
  55. Patti, A., Cicala, G., & Acierno, D. (2020). Eco-sustainability of the textile production: Waste recovery and current recycling in the composites world. Polymers, 13(1), 134. DOI: DOI: 10.3390/polym13010134.
  56. Prasad, M. N. V. (2024). Bioremediation, bioeconomy, circular economy, and circular bioeconomy—Strategies for sustainability. In Bioremediation and bioeconomy (pp. 3-32). Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-443-16120-9.00025-X
  57. Petchimuthu, S., Kamacı, H., & Senapati, T. (2024). Evaluation of artificial intelligence-based solid waste segregation technologies through multi-criteria decision-making and complex q-rung picture fuzzy frank aggregation operators. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 133, 108154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108154
  58. Romsdal, A., Dreyer, H. C., Bakker, S. J., & Carvajal, A. (2024, September). Upcycling of Food Waste Through Bioconversion by Insect Larvae: Conceptual Model and Research Agenda for a Circular Food Supply Chain. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems (pp. 112-126). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-71622-5_8
  59. Rani, P., Mishra, A. R., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S., & Kar, S. (2021). Multi-criteria food waste treatment method selection using single-valued neutrosophic-CRITIC-MULTIMOORA framework. Applied Soft Computing, 111, 107657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107657.
  60. Rashama, C., Riann, C., & Matambo, T. (2023). Hierarchy of waste management strategies: Strategy selection for managing Johannesburg city’s restaurant food waste. 3390/ECP2023-14627
  61. Rukhsar, M., Ullah, K., Ali, Z., & Hussain, A. (2024). Analysis of power aggregation operators through circular intuitionistic fuzzy information and their applications in machine learning analysis. Engineering Reports. https://doi.org/10.30765/er.2571
  62. Rizwan, S. B., Rizwan, D.,Masoodi, A.F. (2025). Circular economy in the food systems: A review. Environmental Quality Management, 34(3), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.70096.
  63. Ren, J., & Toniolo, S. (2020). Life cycle sustainability prioritization of alternative technologies for food waste to energy: a multi-actor multi-criteria decision-making approach. Waste-To-Energy, 345–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-816394-8.00012-4.
  64. Rukhsar, M., Hussain, A., Ullah, K., Moslem, S., & Senapati, T. (2025). Intelligent decision analysis for green supplier selection with multiple attributes using circular intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation and frank triangular norms. Energy Reports, 13, 5773-5791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2025.05.011
  65. Stone, J., Garcia-Garcia, G., & Rahimifard, S. (2019). Development of a pragmatic framework to help food and drink manufacturers select the most sustainable food waste valorisation strategy. Journal of environmental management, Volume 247, Pages 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.037.
  66. Šimić, V., Gokasar, I., Deveci, M., & Švadlenka, L. (2024). Mitigating Climate Change Effects of Urban Transportation Using a Type-2 Neutrosophic MEREC-MARCOS Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 3233-3249. DOI:10.1109/TEM.2022.3207375.
  67. Son, N.H., & Hieu, T.T. (2023). Selection of welding robot by multi-criteria decision-making method. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies.
  68. Sadhya, H., Mansoor Ahammed, M., & Shaikh, I. N. (2021, August). Use of multi-criteria decision-making techniques for selecting waste-to-energy technologies. In International Conference on Chemical, Bio and Environmental Engineering (pp. 505-527). Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-030-96554-9_34
  69. Suvitha, K., Narayanamoorthy, S., Pamučar, D., & Kang, D. (2024). An ideal plastic waste management system based on an enhanced MCDM technique. Artificial Intelligence Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10737-y
  70. Stanković, M., Stević, Ž., Das, D. K., Subotić, M., & Pamučar, D. (2020). A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics, 8(3), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030457
  71. Stone, J., Garcia-Garcia, G., & Rahimifard, S. (2019). Development of a pragmatic framework to help food and drink manufacturers select the most sustainable food waste valorisation strategy. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 425-438. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.037
  72. Sagar, N. A., Pareek, S., Sharma, S., Yahia, E. M., & Lobo, M. G. (2018). Fruit and vegetable waste: Bioactive compounds, their extraction, and possible utilization. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 17(3), 512-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12330
  73. Sánchez García, E., Martínez Falcó, J., Marco Lajara, B., & Manresa Marhuenda, E. (2023). Revolutionizing the circular economy through new technologies: A new era of sustainable progress. Environmental Technology & Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103509
  74. Socas-Rodríguez, B., Álvarez-Rivera, G., Valdés, A., Ibáñez, E., & Cifuentes, A. (2021). Food by-products and food wastes: Are they safe enough for their valorization?. Trends in Food Science & Technology, Volume 114, 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.05.002.
  75. Sha, X., Xu, Z., & Yin, C. (2018). Elliptical distribution‑based weight‑determining method for ordered weighted averaging operators. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 33(5), 761‑775. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22078
  76. Sarangi, P. K., Pal, P., Singh, A. K., Sahoo, U. K., & Prus, P. (2024). Food Waste to Food Security: Transition from Bioresources to Sustainability. Resources, 13(12), 164. DOI: 10.3390/resources13120164.
  77. Thorsen, M., Skeaff, S., Goodman-Smith, F., Thong, B., Bremer, P., & Mirosa, M. (2022). Upcycled foods: A nudge toward nutrition. Frontiers in Nutrition, 1071829. DOI:10.3389/fnut.2022.1071829.
  78. Tchonkouang, R. D., Onyeaka, H., & Miri, T. (2023). From waste to plate: Exploring the impact of food waste valorisation on achieving zero hunger. Sustainability, 15(13), 10571; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310571
  79. Tronnebati, I., Jawab, F., Frichi, Y., & Arif, J. (2024). Green supplier selection using fuzzy AHP, fuzzy TOSIS, and fuzzy WASPAS: A case study of the Moroccan automotive industry. Sustainability, 16(11), 4580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114580
  80. Urugo, M. M., Teka, T. A., Gemede, H. F., Mersha, S., Tessema, A., Woldemariam, H. W., & Admassu, H. (2024). A comprehensive review of current approaches on food waste reduction strategies. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 23(5), e70011. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70011.
  81. Wang, X., Dou, Z., Feng, S. et al. Global food nutrients analysis reveals alarming gaps and daunting challenges. Nat Food 4, 1007–1017 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s43016-023-00851-5.
  82. Wu, G., Chong, J.W.R., Khoo,K. S., Ying Ying Tang, D., Loke Show,P. (2025). Upcycling food waste for microalgae cultivation toward lipid production in a closed-loop and system integrated circular bioeconomy. Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts (2025) 18:74 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-025-02679-6.
  83. Wang, J., Wang, Y., Xiao, M., Liang, Q., Yang, S., Liu, J., Sun, H. (2024). Upcycling food waste into biorefinery production by microalgae. Chemical Engineering Journal, 149532. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2024.149532.
  84. Wang, Q., Cheng, T., Lu, Y., Huang, J. (2024). Underground Mine Safety and Health: A Hybrid MEREC–CoCoSo System for the Selection of Best Sensor. DOI: 10.3390/s24041285.
  85. Wong, G. H. C., Pant, A., Zhang, Y., Chua, C. K., Hashimoto, M., Leo, C. H., & Tan, U. X. (2022). 3D food printing sustainability through food waste upcycling. Materials Today: Proceedings, 70, 627-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.08.565.
  86. Xue, H. Y., Zhang, X. J., & Wang, Y. Q. (2014). Research on the disposal strategy of waste textiles. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 522, 817-820. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-014-9311.
  87. Yazdi, M., Moradi, R., Nedjati, A., Pirbalouti, R. G., & Li, H. (2024). E-waste circular economy decision-making: a comprehensive approach for sustainable operation management in the UK. Neural Computing and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-024-09754-3
  88. Zhang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2024). Assessing agri-food waste valorization challenges and solutions considering smart technologies: An integrated Fermatean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability, 16(14), Article 6169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16146169.
 

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 432
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 350


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب
login