بررسی و تحلیل نظریه هنجارمندی منطق با تکیه بر دیدگاه جان مک‌فارلین

 

References

Broome, J. (2000). Normative Requirements,‖ in Normativity, ed. J. Dancy. In: Oxford: Blackwell.

Evershed, J. (2021). Another way logic might be normative. Synthese, 199(3), 5861-5881.

Frege, G. (1956). The thought: A logical inquiry. Mind, 65(259), 289-311.

Frege, G. (1979). A brief survey of my logical doctrines. H. Hermes, F. Kambartel, and Friedrich Kaulbach (eds and trans.). Frege: Posthumous Writings. In: Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Harman, G. (1984). Logic and reasoning. In Foundations: logic, language, and mathematics (pp. 107-127). Springer.

Harman, G. (1986). Change in view: Principles of reasoning. The MIT Press.

MacFarlane, J. (2002). Frege, Kant, and the logic in logicism. The philosophical review, 111(1), 25-65.

MacFarlane, J. (2004). In what sense (if any) is logic normative for thought. Unpublished manuscript.

McConnell, T. (2022). Moral dilemmas. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-dilemmas/.

Priest, G. (1979). Two dogmas of quineanism. The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 29(117), 289-301.

Russell, G. (2020). Logic isn’t normative. Inquiry, 63(3-4), 371-388.

Steinberger, F. (2017a). Frege and Carnap on the normativity of logic. Synthese, 194(1), 143-162.

Steinberger, F. (2017b). The normative status of logic. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/logic-normative/.

Steinberger, F. (2019). Three ways in which logic might be normative. The Journal of Philosophy, 116(1), 5-31.

 References [In Persian]

Kalantari, Seyed Ali. (2019). “An Examination of the Normativity Theory of Logic with Emphasis on Harman’s Critiques and Providing an Explication of This Theory.” Philosophy of Science, No. 2, pp. 81–103. [In Persian]